Na unsa naman ka vayooot...naka drugs ka?!?! The pink elephant is a hypothetical example. unsa gud tawon..ang pag sabot nimo kay literal.
Ug usa pa....I compared you to a dog? The dog again is an example...ngano sakitan man ka ana nga comment. Not unless na igo ka! Kung sa imong panan aw nga di ka "dog" then ayaw ug react!
to quote you ha.....
"Aside from the fact that this post by high_heels has irresponsibly diminished a homosexual human being into a dog (which is just heartless and incredibly offensive), people should know that the law can and has been amended numerous times, usually to improve it. That's exactly why little discussions like these matter, because it can possibly be a precursor to a deeper understanding of tolerance in this wildly homophobic country of ours. <------vayot, you said it yourself.... "little discussions" ug nganong diri man i discuss nga MAJOR change mani inyong gi hisgutan. diba dapat adto ninyo ipa dayag sa kadagkuan para ma dunggan mo sa inyong pagarpar.
unya naa pa gyud ning gi sulti nimo ha.....
"deeper understanding of tolerance <----the word "tolerance" coming from you. Diba gi TOLERATE naman mo sa pag buhat sa inyong gusto diri. unsa pa man diay ka taaaaaaaasssss nga TOLERANCE inyong gipangayo sa katawhan? Nga usbon ninyo ang balaud sa bibliya ug ang balaud sa katawhan?!?!?! Di na tolerance inyong gi pangayo vayoooot, kay kung TOLERANCE level ra sa pag accept ninyo...sus naabot na sa kalangitan ang pag TOLERATE sa inyong lihok aning kalibutana! Ang klarong gi buhat ninyo ron kay inyong IHANSAK sa among nawong nga KINAHANGLAN HATAGAN MO SA INYONG GUSTO!
To end my point........ A person's "WANTS" is different from what a person "NEEDS"!!!!
Intiendes mga gay friends?!?!?!?!
*quick question..........
kung ma approve ang gay marriage dri are they entitled to tax exemptions/breaks too? just wondering.
how about marrying your relatives
^_^ OT na na boss, legally you can marry your 3rd degree relatives. Sa mata lang sa society dili acceptable.
The original issue raised is wether Marriage Equality should be legal or not. We have presented our argument in a logical manner.
The benefits that same-*** couples will have under the law is nothing special, it is the same benefits given to heteresexual couples. The question becomes why deny this particular right to these marginalized people.
You are arguing that there is no logical reason why Marriage Equality should be allowed when it is staring you right in the face, Same *** marriage gives same *** couples the benefits and protection that the law already provides to heterosexual couples.
With regards to sodom and gomorrah, you are basing your arguments on theology which frankly has no place in the field of logic
Allow this video to school you on what a "bible marriage" is
Again let me state this, the church has absolutely nothing to do with it. Marriage is a civil bond duly recognized by the law. The reason we as a society can progress and move forward is due to change. Laws are amended all the time, and this would just be another law amended to give full rights to gays and lesbians to marry the person they love
![]()
Similar Threads |
|