Meco

[PipayNove]

---

repost : fyi purposes if ever you know this person

"I HAD A BAD EXPERIENCE LAST WEDNESDAY AFTERNOON WHEN I PAID MY ELECTRIC BILL AT MACTAN ELECTRIC COMPANY IN LAPU-LAPU CITY. AFTER FOLLOWING THE USUAL PROCEDURE OF HAVING MY BILL STAMPED BY THE SECURITY GUARD OF THE PRIORITY NUMBER AND INFORMING THE GUARD THAT I AM A SENIOR CITIZEN, I PROCEEDED TO THE TELLER FOR SENIOR CITIZENS ONLY TO BE SNUBBED. THE REASON FOR THE TELLER, A CERTAIN LIGAYA TIBAY, REFUSAL TO ACCEPT MY PAYMENT IS BECAUSE THE PRIORITY NUMBER STAMPED ON MY BILL IS NOT FOR SENIOR CITIZENS. THERE WAS NO OTHER CUSTOMER BEHIND ME ON THE LINE SO SHE MIGHT EXCUSE HERSELF TO ENTERTAIN/ACCOMODATE. SHE WAS JUST TOO ARROGANT AND INSENSITIVE TO TELL ME TO GO BACK TO THE GUARD AND HAVE MY BILL STAMPED THE RIGHT PRIORITY NUMBER. DEFINITELY, REPUBLIC ACT 9257 DOES NOT GIVE MS. LIGAYA TIBAY AUTHORITY TO INSULT OR HARASS A SENIOR CITIZEN WHO IS INTITLED TO ALL RESPECT AND PRIVILEGES UNDER THE LAW. NO OFFICE POLICY, AS EXPLAINED BY OTHER SECURITY GUARDS, CAN OVERRULE A NATIONAL LAW. ESPECIALLY THAT THE SITUATION IS VERY SIMPLE; A SENIOR CITIZEN WANTED TO PAY HIS BILL, THE TELLER INCHARGE FOR SENIOR CITIZENS IS FREE AND NOT ENTERTAINING ANYBODY, NO OTHER SENIOR CITIZEN CUSTOMERS WERE AROUND, YET, FOR THE VERY SIMPLE REQUIREMENT OF THE PRIORITY NUMBER, WHICH IS NOT MY FAULT BECAUSE I INFORMED THE SECURITY GUARD THAT I AM A SENIOR CITIZEN, I SUFFRED HUMILIATION. I HOPE MS. LIGAYA TIBAY WONT SUFFER THE SAME AS I DO WHEN SHE GETS OLD."

[the Messenger]

@TS: Pwede ka magpa-assess daan kung pila ang bayran. Just ask the office - left-hand side of the building. Tan-awon man to sa lady ang building permit. Mga 5k+ pod amo new house bag-o lang. No idea about fixers and certainly don't want to go through them.

@PipayNove: Sorry to hear about the senior citizen's experience. I hope she writes a formal letter of complaint against the actions of the teller. Naa jud bitaw arrogant tellers dira - this bit we can attest jud.

[bearish]

repost : fyi purposes if ever you know this person

"I HAD A BAD EXPERIENCE LAST WEDNESDAY AFTERNOON WHEN I PAID MY ELECTRIC BILL AT MACTAN ELECTRIC COMPANY IN LAPU-LAPU CITY. AFTER FOLLOWING THE USUAL PROCEDURE OF HAVING MY BILL STAMPED BY THE SECURITY GUARD OF THE PRIORITY NUMBER AND INFORMING THE GUARD THAT I AM A SENIOR CITIZEN, I PROCEEDED TO THE TELLER FOR SENIOR CITIZENS ONLY TO BE SNUBBED. THE REASON FOR THE TELLER, A CERTAIN LIGAYA TIBAY, REFUSAL TO ACCEPT MY PAYMENT IS BECAUSE THE PRIORITY NUMBER STAMPED ON MY BILL IS NOT FOR SENIOR CITIZENS. THERE WAS NO OTHER CUSTOMER BEHIND ME ON THE LINE SO SHE MIGHT EXCUSE HERSELF TO ENTERTAIN/ACCOMODATE. SHE WAS JUST TOO ARROGANT AND INSENSITIVE TO TELL ME TO GO BACK TO THE GUARD AND HAVE MY BILL STAMPED THE RIGHT PRIORITY NUMBER. DEFINITELY, REPUBLIC ACT 9257 DOES NOT GIVE MS. LIGAYA TIBAY AUTHORITY TO INSULT OR HARASS A SENIOR CITIZEN WHO IS INTITLED TO ALL RESPECT AND PRIVILEGES UNDER THE LAW. NO OFFICE POLICY, AS EXPLAINED BY OTHER SECURITY GUARDS, CAN OVERRULE A NATIONAL LAW. ESPECIALLY THAT THE SITUATION IS VERY SIMPLE; A SENIOR CITIZEN WANTED TO PAY HIS BILL, THE TELLER INCHARGE FOR SENIOR CITIZENS IS FREE AND NOT ENTERTAINING ANYBODY, NO OTHER SENIOR CITIZEN CUSTOMERS WERE AROUND, YET, FOR THE VERY SIMPLE REQUIREMENT OF THE PRIORITY NUMBER, WHICH IS NOT MY FAULT BECAUSE I INFORMED THE SECURITY GUARD THAT I AM A SENIOR CITIZEN, I SUFFRED HUMILIATION. I HOPE MS. LIGAYA TIBAY WONT SUFFER THE SAME AS I DO WHEN SHE GETS OLD."

What did you do then sir? I think you can ask for guidance where to go in case you have complains... try to bring that case to the management of meco sir. give that arrogant teller a lesson. she will continue to be arrogant when we don't act accordingly.

[jofer]

repost : fyi purposes if ever you know this person

"I HAD A BAD EXPERIENCE LAST WEDNESDAY AFTERNOON WHEN I PAID MY ELECTRIC BILL AT MACTAN ELECTRIC COMPANY IN LAPU-LAPU CITY. AFTER FOLLOWING THE USUAL PROCEDURE OF HAVING MY BILL STAMPED BY THE SECURITY GUARD OF THE PRIORITY NUMBER AND INFORMING THE GUARD THAT I AM A SENIOR CITIZEN, I PROCEEDED TO THE TELLER FOR SENIOR CITIZENS ONLY TO BE SNUBBED. THE REASON FOR THE TELLER, A CERTAIN LIGAYA TIBAY, REFUSAL TO ACCEPT MY PAYMENT IS BECAUSE THE PRIORITY NUMBER STAMPED ON MY BILL IS NOT FOR SENIOR CITIZENS. THERE WAS NO OTHER CUSTOMER BEHIND ME ON THE LINE SO SHE MIGHT EXCUSE HERSELF TO ENTERTAIN/ACCOMODATE. SHE WAS JUST TOO ARROGANT AND INSENSITIVE TO TELL ME TO GO BACK TO THE GUARD AND HAVE MY BILL STAMPED THE RIGHT PRIORITY NUMBER. DEFINITELY, REPUBLIC ACT 9257 DOES NOT GIVE MS. LIGAYA TIBAY AUTHORITY TO INSULT OR HARASS A SENIOR CITIZEN WHO IS INTITLED TO ALL RESPECT AND PRIVILEGES UNDER THE LAW. NO OFFICE POLICY, AS EXPLAINED BY OTHER SECURITY GUARDS, CAN OVERRULE A NATIONAL LAW. ESPECIALLY THAT THE SITUATION IS VERY SIMPLE; A SENIOR CITIZEN WANTED TO PAY HIS BILL, THE TELLER INCHARGE FOR SENIOR CITIZENS IS FREE AND NOT ENTERTAINING ANYBODY, NO OTHER SENIOR CITIZEN CUSTOMERS WERE AROUND, YET, FOR THE VERY SIMPLE REQUIREMENT OF THE PRIORITY NUMBER, WHICH IS NOT MY FAULT BECAUSE I INFORMED THE SECURITY GUARD THAT I AM A SENIOR CITIZEN, I SUFFRED HUMILIATION. I HOPE MS. LIGAYA TIBAY WONT SUFFER THE SAME AS I DO WHEN SHE GETS OLD."

lig.ona raba name maa untag makuryentehan

[tikotakz]

wala mani klaro ang MECO nah service.

[sierrachello]

5000 na TS

[_Bordz_]

kong naa kay reklamo dugay sad cla mo response.

[_Bordz_]

wala mani klaro ang MECO nah service.

sakto jud ka bro... faetz

[PipayNove]

yes. I've known several people who experienced cruelty from that Ligaya Tibay but she's still there' lig-on kaayo og backer.lol

[PipayNove]

lig.ona raba name maa untag makuryentehan

yes. I've known several people who experienced cruelty from that Ligaya Tibay but she's still there' lig-on kaayo og backer.lol