Subic Rape Case ---> Naa ba gyud kahang Rape?

[SPRINGFIELD_XD_40]

---

ahem. it's from a blog for sure but the quote is based from the court hearing. she's still dazed when the examination was done. which i presumed after the they went to the police.

How did you know its BASED from the COURT HEARING ? Hehehe alangan man ug magkatawa siya and mag cartwheel2x in front of the judge . When you are supposed to be a RAPE VICTIM , you wil need all the SYMPATHY you need .

hope you could give us a link so we could read it.

Searching will help . I am looking for it also , it should not be that hard considering I am checking it online and aprobably you on an actual NEWSPAPER back when it was still the " IN TOPIC " .

no one told me. it just make sense. in case of a crime, go to the police. if you need support or shelter because of an abuse, those organization.

Of course you go to a POLICE STATION to file and report a crime . If we are on the same page , I am talking about after that . Did those organizations took care of her or the politicians and the leftist groups ?

i cannot comprehend what you are writing. sorry.

Atong BINISAY-ON . Ang duha ka kampo mo ginansya sa nahitabo na walay puhunan ug ang kanjo gi gisa sa kaugalingon na mantika . Gets na ?

it's the girl's party decision. it's not the politician.

LOLS ... the POLITICIANS are NICHOLE'S party .

maybe they could influence her decision but it seems they didn't.

Because your stand is naay RAPE nahitabo . Natural .

but if the reason that she file a rape case for a money, she should have settled before it went to court because she cannot get any if the judge already ruled the case.

Mao bitaw the INFLUENCE and the POWER of the backers of NICHOLE played the gameboard . Sa pusoy pa sila ni bangka . From these POLICITIANS agenda , NICHOLE is only a SCAPEGOAT and a good reason for them to take action considering the right time and right place.

i've been accused of being crazy before so it's ok with me. but i can say subic is not that bad.
disney for me would be fun but for her it's not my call. if it is subic for her ti supportahan ko siya. different strokes for different folks.

Hehehe .... kana if you really meant to go there to have fun , bisan ako . Too bad she went to Subic to meet someone na member sa VFA na kano na USMC na kauban sa boyfriend sa iyang sister pod . Now tell me , did she go there to have FUN considering the given facts ?

oh, i will neither close my eyes nor shut my eyes. sorry, the question is for me. actually it's inconclusive. always. in rape cases, it's always the testimony of the accuser have more weight.

It is CONCLUSIVE because you said in your HUMBLE OPINION naay RAPE nahitabo . Kung ang jerjer walay forced entry , it equates to *** with CONSENT . By crying alone , it does not relate to any FORCED ENTRY . Who knows hilak ka kay nabitin , nahan pa pero wala nay gana ang partner etc .

man, her case is like manna for this politicans. of course, they will helped for the media mileage that they will get.

Is it for the coming elections or for their HIDDEN AGENDAS ? DOnt play with me .... we all know how well we knew them mapa beterano o bag-o , mapa tiguwang o batan-on ang politko .

no, no. that's not what i meant. if she had her way. but she could not. she has no power over the courts. but she have power to put smith where she think could, at least, reduced the kink in the relationship.

She has no POWER at all . She has the leverage her BACKERS needs and wants because she is the ALLEGEDLY VICTIM of a heinous crime punishable by death or life w/o parole in some countries . IN short , pabor si NICHOLE in anything she wants the outcome would be .

Other than NICHOLE'S statements na gi RAPE siya , there is no SOLID EVIDENCE of her being RAPED by SMITH . Swerte lang si NICHOLE ... by law and the loophole technicalities of the courts , WHOEVER CALLS FOR HELP FIRST is ALWAYS the VICTIM NO MATTER WHAT .

[Shofu]

SIkat na kayo nas Nichole..Her story is even spreading here in China & HK. I am not totally convinced she was raped , it could be shs meeting someone kay gusto magpayari kay unsa man purpose niya mo adto in d first place, maybe she considered d whole thing a rape kay maybe shs expeting more fun fun to happen unya wala kauyon sa nahetabo... Sila ra jud ni Smith nakabalo wats d real score and sakyan nalang pud politika.

[Shofu]

Mura manpud gisunod nila and DUKE's case sa America...It turned out wla jud rape nahetabo unya sakyan politika kay naa mga vested interests..

[SPRINGFIELD_XD_40]

Hidden Agneda's indeed , kana si NICHOLE kay leverage lang na siya and a scapegoat .

[cerebus]

ahem. it's from a blog for sure but the quote is based from the court hearing. she's still dazed when the examination was done. which i presumed after the they went to the police.

How did you know its BASED from the COURT HEARING ? Hehehe alangan man ug magkatawa siya and mag cartwheel2x in front of the judge . When you are supposed to be a RAPE VICTIM , you wil need all the SYMPATHY you need .

sir, i think you got to read the entry from the link. i can't do the reading for you. the source is from inquirer. if you read it you know it's the defendant lawyer asking the victim how she still manage to ask permission from the examining doctor to pee if she really still dazed.

hope you could give us a ]

Searching will help . I am looking for it also , it should not be that hard considering I am checking it online and aprobably you on an actual NEWSPAPER back when it was still the " IN TOPIC " .

i can't do the searching for you but i think that the ]no one told me. it just make sense. in case of a crime, go to the police. if you need support or shelter because of an abuse, those organization.

Of course you go to a POLICE STATION to file and report a crime . If we are on the same page , I am talking about after that . Did those organizations took care of her or the politicians and the leftist groups ?

even if were on the same page, not every victim goes to this organization if the family could provide the need. maybe for support (psychologist) but not for shelter. i think the politicians and the so-called women group are just hanger-ons.

i cannot comprehend what you are writing. sorry.

Atong BINISAY-ON . Ang duha ka kampo mo ginansya sa nahitabo na walay puhunan ug ang kanjo gi gisa sa kaugalingon na mantika . Gets na ?

i can't expect less from you. slam it even you don't have it.

it's the girl's party decision. it's not the politician.

LOLS ... the POLITICIANS are NICHOLE'S party .

aha.

maybe they could influence her decision but it seems they didn't.

Because your stand is naay RAPE nahitabo . Natural .

and you believe the opposite. naturally.

but if the reason that she file a rape case for a money, she should have settled before it went to court because she cannot get any if the judge already ruled the case.

Mao bitaw the INFLUENCE and the POWER of the backers of NICHOLE played the gameboard . Sa pusoy pa sila ni bangka . From these POLICITIANS agenda , NICHOLE is only a SCAPEGOAT and a good reason for them to take action considering the right time and right place.

she's not a scapegoat because a scapegoat is someone that is punished for the errors of others. the right word is exploited.

i've been accused of being crazy before so it's ok with me. but i can say subic is not that bad.
disney for me would be fun but for her it's not my call. if it is subic for her ti supportahan ko siya. different strokes for different folks.

Hehehe .... kana if you really meant to go there to have fun , bisan ako . Too bad she went to Subic to meet someone na member sa VFA na kano na USMC na kauban sa boyfriend sa iyang sister pod . Now tell me , did she go there to have FUN considering the given facts ?

i think so. but she got more than she wish for.

oh, i will neither close my eyes nor shut my eyes. sorry, the question is for me. actually it's inconclusive. always. in rape cases, it's always the testimony of the accuser have more weight.

It is CONCLUSIVE because you said in your HUMBLE OPINION naay RAPE nahitabo . Kung ang jerjer walay forced entry , it equates to *** with CONSENT . By crying alone , it does not relate to any FORCED ENTRY . Who knows hilak ka kay nabitin , nahan pa pero wala nay gana ang partner etc .

what i mean about inconclusive is the forced entry thing. both side could get an expert, which they did, to say the right words.

man, her case is like manna for this politicans. of course, they will helped for the media mileage that they will get.

Is it for the coming elections or for their HIDDEN AGENDAS ? DOnt play with me .... we all know how well we knew them mapa beterano o bag-o , mapa tiguwang o batan-on ang politko .

when you said hidden agenda you mean malakanyang? i really don't give a damn what they want. they're all like leeches to me. all for themselves.

no, no. that's not what i meant. if she had her way. but she could not. she has no power over the courts. but she have power to put smith where she think could, at least, reduced the kink in the relationship.

She has no POWER at all . She has the leverage her BACKERS needs and wants because she is the ALLEGEDLY VICTIM of a heinous crime punishable by death or life w/o parole in some countries . IN short , pabor si NICHOLE in anything she wants the outcome would be .

Other than NICHOLE'S statements na gi RAPE siya , there is no SOLID EVIDENCE of her being RAPED by SMITH . Swerte lang si NICHOLE ... by law and the loophole technicalities of the courts , WHOEVER CALLS FOR HELP FIRST is ALWAYS the VICTIM NO MATTER WHAT .

its not the loophole or technicalities that do the defendant in. it's his stupidity. leaving witnesses that saw them how she dropped the girl at the pier.

[SPRINGFIELD_XD_40]

sir, i think you got to read the entry from the link. i can't do the reading for you. the source is from inquirer. if you read it you know it's the defendant lawyer asking the victim how she still manage to ask permission from the examining doctor to pee if she really still dazed.

You dont have to read it for me . By reading something from somewhere we have no clue at all does not administer the TRUTH . Id rather hear or read you say I CANT ATTEND the COURT HEARING for YOU .

i can't do the searching for you but i think that the link i provide is enough that she went, after reporting to the police, to the doctor.

The question is ... WHEN ?? PEEING is not MEDICO LEGAL and we are talking about MEDICO LEGAL . MEDICO LEGAL my friend is a long process .

even if were on the same page, not every victim goes to this organization if the family could provide the need. maybe for support (psychologist) but not for shelter. i think the politicians and the so-called women group are just hanger-ons.

These are NON PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS , they are free of charge . SO you think about their partnerships now ? ( POLITICIANS and WOMEN GROUPS ) .

i can't expect less from you. slam it even you don't have it.
aha.

Theories that MAKES sense basing on the current events of WHO , WHERE , WHAT , WHEN and WHY specific to the ISSUE .

and you believe the opposite. naturally.

Of course but refer to the reply above . How about you ? Basis on her STATEMENTS ? " HE RAPED ME and I AM TELLING THE TRUTH . "

she's not a scapegoat because a scapegoat is someone that is punished for the errors of others. the right word is exploited.

SHe is a SCAPEGOAT to my understanding . If gi EXPLOIT siya , ngano nakadaog man siya sa kaso ? SIya unta ang biktima gyud and siya ang pildi pa gyud . She is a scapegoat because she was a " fallguy " sa mga " sayop " sa mga politicians na for the second time masakto na aron makab-ot nila ang ilang hidden agenda .

i think so. but she got more than she wish for.

You can think all you can but it will always be an ASSUMPTION . Unlike the facts that she was in SUBIC to meet a friend who is a common friend of the BF of her sister is a FACT .

what i mean about inconclusive is the forced entry thing. both side could get an expert, which they did, to say the right words.

Mao lage .... ang MEDICO LEGAL is bahaw na . That is the only way to figure out other than a statement na " GI RAPE KO NIYA " .

[quote]when you said hidden agenda you mean malakanyang? i really don't give a damn what they want. they're all like leeches to me. all for themselves.[/.quote]

Not necessarily . MALACANANG equates to a lot of things even outside POLITICS . I am just plainly talking about politics .

its not the loophole or technicalities that do the defendant in. it's his stupidity. leaving witnesses that saw them how she dropped the girl at the pier.

LOLZ ... speaking of wqitnesses also . You might want to get acquainted of the PACO LARRANAGA case when speaking of witnesses .

- Isnt it IRONIC when what the WITNESSES saw gi drop si NICHOLE s apier and not the " ACTUAL " rape kuno ??