A video has just been released showing an attack initiated by the Santiago side. Thereby supplementing the Tuflo side for a new evidence on case- and for a clear win.
These evidences are confirming the validity of the Tulfo claims that he was attacked first. Barretto and Santiago claimed that these videos were edited.
Although I really do not care who wins this case, and not being one-sided of the whole matter. It seems that the Barretto allegations for a "hoax" or "edited " evidence is not convincing. The video clearly shows that Tulfo was only making responses with a smile on his face, while the guy in pink hit Tulfo in the head first, provoking an attack from the latter. So Claudine and Raymart statements are clear lies, right Istoryans?
bidyong patunay umano na unang nanakit sina Santiago vs. Tulfo, nakuha ng news5 - YouTube
New Tulfo-Santiago NAIA brawl video surfaces | omg! Philippines News Blog - Yahoo! OMG! Philippines