magatang nalang ta sa vote ugma oi.. hehehe.. usa nalang bitaw ka adlaw.. wanna bet nalang kaha? hahaha.. guilty or not?
magatang nalang ta sa vote ugma oi.. hehehe.. usa nalang bitaw ka adlaw.. wanna bet nalang kaha? hahaha.. guilty or not?
This is precisely Atty. Manalo's point. Cong. Farrinas kept posturing "why this" and "why that", and saying that there are inconsistencies, when they didn't even cross-examine Corona. Mas kusog man ilang case kung doubt ra ang ilang i-present. That's why they didn't cross-examine, and they didn't accept Corona's waiver. They know if the entire story is told, there would be less impact from the doubt.
Dili na ta mobalik sa cross examination kay Corona kay klaro man kaayo nga ang health issue niya ang gi una.Bisan ang depensa mao sad.Di ba dayon man ingon sa Cuevas nga kapoi na iya kliyente kung murag gipit na ug di katubag?Basta ako palusot lng na ang kang Corona nga "nag iipon na ako ng dollar mula pa noong elementary pa ako"Di ba 1960's sila nag start daw?
Dri gyud ni nahibaw an ang katag kay kung makalusot man si Corona sa iyang gitaguan nga Office dri sa Senate murag 50/50 siya
dili bya tanan nga member sa Senate abogado.
they have the option to ask clarifying questions while the senators cross examine him plus the Drillon factor
gitubag naman pud na ni cuevas ron yung about sa dollar he didnt made manifestation kung pila ang value sa $ niya adto, what if $1 lang to? correct gihapon si corona![]()
This trial showed people how powerful politicians can get away with murder in this country, by using technicalities to turn our own laws against the system. Our justice system is too literal and bogged down by technicalities.
The way Miriam and the defense would have us interpret our laws would lead to an absurd result, making the SALN law powerless when it's supposed to be one of our strongest tools against corruption, just because in their mind they feel it conflicts with the FCDA. The British have a smarter approach to this problem, instead of being too literal they take a purposive approach to interpreting their laws. We have to start interpreting our laws in a way that allows them to serve their purpose. Otherwise we'll keep getting absurd results and our country will keep moving backwards.
I think Prosecution's Cong. Belmonte was among the more sincere speaker atong oral exchange. Except for some points in his oration, relatively, he delivered that statement with tack.
cge ask si cuevas sa fellow niya defense team and naa unta gihatag na book sa iya, pero wala dayun na open sa sakto na page.. even sa culpa na pangutana ni JPE sige sya tan aw sa kilid for help and madungan sa background na naa ga dictate niya..
in fairness di man jud ni ma memorize na mga bagay oi.. kinahanglan lang jud naa paspas na researcher sa kilid..
Similar Threads |
|