MERGED: All About the Corona Impeachment

[wak_wak]

Senate president Enrile said,there's no law prohibiting government employee to declare his currency deposit in his SALN.

Enrile says law allows exposure of foreign deposits if allowed by depositor; 3rd parties prohibited from doing so. No secrecy law that says you cannot declare your foreign deposits.

JPE to Cuevas "a public officer or employee is asked to submit all assets etc."

JPE to Cuevas "if its a sovereign command, will disobedience constitute a culpable violation of the constitution?"

Nag katawa nalang ko sa reaction ug tubag ni Cuevas.. hahayzzz.. lets wait and see..

[wak_wak]

ummm...that is the reasoning behind the FCDA, to keep in confidence sa foreign currency kay ma gamit for extortion. ga-tuo mug naa pa tay foreign investors aning nasura kung wala tay in-ana nga balaod?

Sa pag kasabot nako sa istorya ni JPE bro ha;

Senate president Enrile said,there's no law prohibiting government employee to declare his currency deposit in his SALN.

Enrile says law allows exposure of foreign deposits if allowed by depositor; 3rd parties prohibited from doing so. No secrecy law that says you cannot declare your foreign deposits in your SALN.

and read my post bellow.. dili ni ako interpretation bro, base ni sa pag kasabot nako sa gisulti ni JPE..

[wak_wak]

ummm...that is the reasoning behind the FCDA, to keep in confidence sa foreign currency kay ma gamit for extortion. ga-tuo mug naa pa tay foreign investors aning nasura kung wala tay in-ana nga balaod?

and gi istoryaan diri bro is why man di nimu e declare ang dollar deposit sa imu SALN.. naa bay SALN ang foreign investors?

[godsaint]

Word of the day"Palusot"

Kung basihan ang batas,maglisod kay daghan buslot,I hope judges should not only vote on legality but also of conscience..

[æRLO]

and gi istoryaan diri bro is why man di nimu e declare ang dollar deposit sa imu SALN.. naa bay SALN ang foreign investors?

basaha ang balod bai. it doesn't say "foreign investors", it says depositors. considered na ang foreign deposits as "absolutely confidential nature"--by ANY depositor. Ang sayop lage aning balaoda, gi exempt na unta ang public servant sa clause.

[wak_wak]

basaha ang balod bai. it doesn't say "foreign investors", it says depositors. considered na ang foreign deposits as "absolutely confidential nature".

tan aw balik sa mga questions ni Enrile bro, basig naa sa TV Patrol, di nalang ko mu interpret sa law, kay dili ko abogado and wala ko nag skwela ug law, if mao na imu interpretation so be it.. pasensya na di nako ma post tanan arguement ni JPE and Cuevas ganina.. ang ako gi post kay mao ng tubag and istorya ni JPE, and ang pag sabot nako sa iya interpretation..

and sa imu ra nako gi kuha ang foreign investors, mura gi quote man cguro nako imu reply..so mao pud cguro na ang depositor na imu gi pasabot.. hayzzzz...

[Romeojin]

Word of the day"Palusot"

Kung basihan ang batas,maglisod kay daghan buslot,I hope judges should not only vote on legality but also of conscience..

ok lang na ang word of the day kay mga word of the day before is "ILAD" (pertaining to 45 properties, 31 peso acct , 82 dollar acct, small lady etc.)

Still the burden of proof lies to the prosecution how convenient of Farinas to say "palusot" when in fact they didnt cross examine CJ corona or even make use of the waiver. They didnt ask him "why this..." nidiretso lang sila assume ron.

[voldemort]

Mga bai, isang tulog nalang judgement day na sa impeachment case ni CJ. Tag-an2 ta ninyo unsay verdict ani, guilty or not guilty. Wala lay personal attacks ha. If pwede pod i-state inyo reason why guilty or not guilty inyo tag-an.

Ang akoa tag-an kay Guilty. Not necessarily because of the merits of the case or the evidences presented but because of political favors/dealings. The next elections is less than 12 months from now and the senator judges would need campaign funds and I'm sure the admin can give them huge amounts in return for the Guilty verdict.

[æRLO]

tan aw balik sa mga questions ni Enrile bro, basig naa sa TV Patrol, di nalang ko mu interpret sa law, kay dili ko abogado and wala ko nag skwela ug law, if mao na imu interpretation so be it.. pasensya na di nako ma post tanan arguement ni JPE and Cuevas ganina.. ang ako gi post kay mao ng tubag and istorya ni JPE, and ang pag sabot nako sa iya interpretation..

and sa imu ra nako gi kuha ang foreign investors, mura gi quote man cguro nako imu reply..so mao pud cguro na ang depositor na imu gi pasabot.. hayzzzz...

yeah, I know what you mean. I meant to say that fundamentally, that law is to encourage foreign investors--ang akong point is the law itself is flawed because it is ambiguous and too general. Whereas they should specify that the law does not include certain persons, they just chose the word "depositors". I don't know if the framers deliberately did it this way for convenience or so it can benefit them or because it was simply poorly legislated.

[lespaulibanez]

The prosecution delivered like POLITICIANS.

The defense delivered like ACADEMICS.

-TV5 pundits

I would have loved to listen to private prosecutor Mario Bautista instead.
He could have sounded like an academician.
Cuevas did a good one rhetorically but i don't know if it was good legally.

In the end on JPE clarificatory, cuevas appears to have been absent in school when that subject was taken up and Farinas in the end like academics.