MERGED: All About the Corona Impeachment

[Romeojin]

...bro,kung nakatan-aw ka kato mi-witness si morales,ang mga deposits sa mga dollar account ni corona done in mostly in 2004 and 2007 which are elections.then,analyze yourself kung asa gikan ang mga kwarta ni corona,and why is it gma make him a midnight appointee...

dugay na nang midnight appointee issue, i i-explain that several times already. Plus si Penoy had accepted si Corona as CJ cause of naay constitutional basis ang iyang appointment

and about kay GMA, imo na theory that can be countered. As i said, kung wa niingon si Penoy "i will not considered a CJ appointed by GMA" eh si Carpio na atong CJ run by virtue of seniority. Carpio strikeout his name sa JBC list thereby si Corona had won the seat out of seniority ruling.

kanang bribery- iprove na.. dili magpataka assume. kakwarta pud diay si Carpio?

[Romeojin]

ang issue kay dili ill-gotten kundi kung naka declare and disclose ba ang iyang assets (solid or liquid) sa iyang SALN.

And with regards to the issue of 82 accounts, please do remember that on this stage of the impeachment process, it's the defense turn of presenting witness and evidences. The Ombudsman is a defense witness (although hostile). So meaning, it was the defense who opened up this issue and not the prosecution in the first place. And since it was brought up, and if this is not true, better for Corona to present documentary evidences or proof other than his words to debunk the witness testimony..

wrong move? maybe.. but it was a blessing in disguise for others..

i know wa na sa article of impeachment ron ang ill gotten wealth and discrepancy in SALN (that includes non disclosure) is not a ground for impeachment.

i may have confuse you so let me rephrase my statement.. "the persecutors and pro-penoy officials are fishing for evidences." . the dollar accounts had been on the air for several months, the defense team initially doesnt want corona to testify so they rather opt to present a hostile witness. And now corona is really to right person to testify about it. so lets just look ahead for the event tomorrow.

I agree its blessing in disguise cause mismo ang defense team ang nitabang sa blooper-rich persecutors team.

[Romeojin]

Gikan Gloria ug uban mga tao who want the supreme court to decide in their favor.

There are so many ways to make money

any proof? supporting evidences?

you should narrate it to the persecutors team.. they need those

[FKtemp]

he did sign the waiver and since March pa na siya willing to open his dollar accounts. lets wait sa iyang questioning, di man pud ma prove ng persectuors asa gikan ang $. i doubt maminaw pud ang close minded people here sa iyang testimonies hehehe.

sign the waiver lagi pero naa condition... onya ang condition tabla ra sa wala... so i doubt kung tinud-anay iyaha.

[Romeojin]

hehehe...aren't you asking what are the grounds nyor? read back. and can i refer you to GR 185685 please? I hope it would help you understand. and where did you get the idea that a guilty verdict beyond reasonable doubt is needed for an impeachment proceeding? i would agree that it is akin to a criminal case but NOT REALLY A CRIMINAL CASE.

no, im not asking for grounds of impeachment anyone with a brain can google that.

i am reacting to your post.

Very true! Non-declaration on the SALN rather is a ground! hehehe

discrepancy and non disclosure in SALN is not a ground for impeachment.. G? plus the FCL is another thing.

guilty verdict beyond reasonable doubt had been agreed upon by both parties and the impeachment court on the very first week on the impeachment proceedings.

And impeachment case is not criminal case --- i agree lmao mao gani "akin to criminal case" . thats the words of JPE btw.

Enrile said an impeachment trial is similar to a criminal trial in court.

Corona can only be declared liable if there is “clear and convincing evidence” against him.

88-year-old Enrile confident about steering impeachment trial | Inquirer News

[Romeojin]

sign the waiver lagi pero naa condition... onya ang condition tabla ra sa wala... so i doubt kung tinud-anay iyaha.

i believe it was more of a challenge.. im sure taint free congressmen would not hesitate to sign such.

someone already mention, these tongressmen had signed the impeachment complaint hastily to the point some doesnt read it and they will take time on signing a waiver

coronas trial is one thing and this waiver thing, like i said is just a publicity stunt.

we will soon find out tomorrow.

[istoryamember]

tan-awn ta ni ugma kay pwede naman daw walay condition ang iyang waiver. Modagan pa jud nig pila ka adlaw kay mangaykay pa ta ani sa mga dokyomento hehehe. Pero ang ako ganahan tan-awn ani ugma is ang cross. Problem lang ani ug matulog nga magtulo ang laway ra ni CJ ugma kay dili ka storya kay nasakit. Aw tulog nlang pud tag apil.

[alfalfa]

Enrile: This is not a criminal case | Inquirer News

“We’re going to decide this case on the basis of the quantum of evidence that we think is best to be used in determining whether he is guilty or not guilty, not beyond reasonable doubt because this is a not a criminal case. It is akin to a criminal case, but not really a criminal case.” JPE

hehehe

[alfalfa]

Murag wa na may kisaw. Kindly quote the person properly next time.

[FKtemp]

report sa ombudsman to congress... Did CJ amass ill-gotten wealth? | Inquirer Opinion

kung ma acquit ni... mura naa jud ni part 2.