if ever coronas dollar accounts would prove the prosecution wrong, mangunay jud kog pa impeach atong mga congressman ug kanang abnormal sa malacanang, BUT if sakto sila, dapat e tupad na silag selda ni glorya.
if ever coronas dollar accounts would prove the prosecution wrong, mangunay jud kog pa impeach atong mga congressman ug kanang abnormal sa malacanang, BUT if sakto sila, dapat e tupad na silag selda ni glorya.
‘Certainly, a judge who falls short of the ethics of the judicial office tends to diminish the people’s respect for the law and legal processes. He also fails to observe and maintain the esteem due to the courts and to judicial officers. Respondent must always bear in mind that it is a magistrate’s duty to uphold the integrity of the judiciary at all times.’ –Justice Renato C. Corona (DEE C. CHUAN & SONS, INC.vs. Judge Peralta, A.M. No. RTJ-05-1917)
i doubt i-tackle sa na IC, wala labot ang ill-gotten wealth.
Diba gipakita man to niya ang pie-chart na gikan sa daku kaau nahimo na lang upat? Maoy akong sabot ato... sa iya pa pagka explain... everytime mo open of time-deposit mo open sab og account number, since kapila man siya nag open of time-deposit naa jud ma create na account. Ang 82 accounts is not open but all accounts na na-open under Corona's name. Valid ang explanation ni Corona ngano naabot og 82, wala na lalis ana.pangutan.on ka pila imong dollar account.. alangan iapil nimo ang mga close na account. did he admit na 82 total? links beh
tinuod jud ka bai 90% tingali sa 188 congressman naa tinago-an... but does that make Corona also less guilty? Kung ako wala ko gabayad og sakto pagkuha nako og Cedula, and most of employed persons are not paying the right amount of Cedula. Am I less guilty of the crime?he answered it naman na dollar account are protected by law, kung himuon na tool for corruption ambot na lang. si corona ra diay gabuhat ani? iprove na lang lagi ang root cause.. gi bribe siya or nangaurakot siya and he stash it on his dollar accounts.
agree jud ko bai... daku jud kaau og chance na naa tinago-an, but dili ba siya man dapat ang mo prove sa iyang innocence? Ako balikon... Kung ako wala ko gabayad og sakto pagkuha nako og Cedula, and most of employed persons are not paying the right amount para sa Cedula. Am I less guilty of the crime?but again corona is willing to open his dollar accounts he signed a waiver and asking other politicians to sign it too. for you bai, wouldnt you agree with me ang kinsa di mo sign of waiver naay gitago??
seriously, the prosecution (including Drillon) want the truth out? take up on the CJ's offer. Seriously, that is the easiest way to resolve this trial. Sign the waivers, all 189, and the CJ will have to waive his right regarding bank-depositor confidence. What exactly do those 189 politicians have to lose? Sigeg hisgot ug justice oi, and now that Corona gave them the means to make it easier for them to reveal the truth, how can they afford to be reluctant?
You scraped for evidence for months, some more credible than others, and karun nga he gave his word in front of the court, under oath, to reveal EVERYTHING in exchange for what he calls 'transparency' and you won't take it? Come on now, obviously, you've got nothing to hide because you are damning a man for an alleged graft.
Para sa mga tao aning thread. Shame on you for your prejudices. Sigeg reklamo ug corrupt ang goberno nya karun nga naay chance for transparency and be able to look into the assets of Corona and numerous others, you let you're prejudice get the best of you. You should be encouraging those politicians to take up on the offer. The revelation of truth shouldn't be limited to the respondent but to the whole body, and 190 public officers is a better start than just one.
Last edited by æRLO; 05-23-2012 at 01:54 PM.
Similar Threads |
|