Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 25
  1. #11

    Default Re: Mitsubishi L300 FB or SUZUKI Multicab FB


    Quote Originally Posted by chris_bern View Post
    in cases of floods mga bay.. asa ba sa ila ang magdugay? kanang dili dayun magtirik ba..
    l300 it has a higher ride height, kabantay ka pag baha daghan mag tirik nga multicab. well there you go.

    if u want a cheaper alternative though i cannot guarantee how well it performs or last just check these cars in my opinion way better than d multicab.

    https://www.istorya.net/forums/vehicl...8l-diesel.html


    or this one from chery motors had a chance to check it out a few months ago it looks promising. 1.0 gas dual ac and in the 500k price range almost tempted to buying this but then decided to get a suzuki apv instead.

  2. #12

    Default Re: Mitsubishi L300 FB or SUZUKI Multicab FB

    @tonioyantao

    ayus jud bitaw ang L300 in terms sa engine performance.. and I agree with you na pagbaha dili dayun magtirik ang L300.. but when it comes to fuel efficiency pud murag mas efficient man gud ang multicab in my own experience.

    long time ago I used to drive this L300 van and I fill it up with fuel in full tank and I just noticed na sa first round trip pa lang dali lang makaltas ang fuel, compared sa nag drive kog multicab na it takes 2 trips pa bago sya makaltasan sa fuel..

    oh well, siguro kay tungod the L300 that I drove is 2nd hand na sad and the multicab that I drove is not that heavily used pa gyud. maybe that's why murag naay mismatch sa efficiency kung mag compare ko nila.

  3. #13

    Default Re: Mitsubishi L300 FB or SUZUKI Multicab FB

    Quote Originally Posted by chris_bern View Post
    @tonioyantao

    ayus jud bitaw ang L300 in terms sa engine performance.. and I agree with you na pagbaha dili dayun magtirik ang L300.. but when it comes to fuel efficiency pud murag mas efficient man gud ang multicab in my own experience.

    long time ago I used to drive this L300 van and I fill it up with fuel in full tank and I just noticed na sa first round trip pa lang dali lang makaltas ang fuel, compared sa nag drive kog multicab na it takes 2 trips pa bago sya makaltasan sa fuel..

    oh well, siguro kay tungod the L300 that I drove is 2nd hand na sad and the multicab that I drove is not that heavily used pa gyud. maybe that's why murag naay mismatch sa efficiency kung mag compare ko nila.
    actually diesel engines from mitsubishi are not designed for maximum fuel efficiency compared to the older isuzu engines from the fuego and crosswind, but still it's not uncommon for some drivers claiming to reach a 16km/liter run depending on how you drive it.

    on long trips the multicab shines in fuel efficiency but driving it around the city in moderate traffic and you'll get a dismal 8-10 km/liter, same as most vehicle in the market today which is far more comfortable.

    but if u do a little math, the price on diesel vs gas with the fuel efficiency on both vehicles you'll find out that the cost of running these cars are not that far.

    i also have another car that i want you to check. the pricing is almost the same as the l300 fb.
    the hyundai porter and the kia k2700 they are far more modern, larger engine and fresher design

  4. #14

    Default Re: Mitsubishi L300 FB or SUZUKI Multicab FB

    Quote Originally Posted by tonioyantao View Post

    i also have another car that i want you to check. the pricing is almost the same as the l300 fb.
    the hyundai porter and the kia k2700 they are far more modern, larger engine and fresher design

    this korean Light trucks are good especially the Kia K2700 because they have an excellent braking system which is safe for both cargo and passengers.. kaya lang this korean cars are very expensive especially if its brand new.. kung mupalit pud ko ug 2nd hand ani nila dili na pud ko makampante kay bun-og na ko ana sa maintenance..

    that's why I chose my ideal LCV's to suzuki and Mitsubishi L300 Fb regardless kung brand new or 2nd hand because it meets most of my expectations while I am on the road..

  5. #15

    Default Re: Mitsubishi L300 FB or SUZUKI Multicab FB

    ah ic.. just checked hyundais website d na diay porter ang tawag, h100 na diay the fb model with dual ac is around 800k
    while d kia.... ur right just too expensive for an lcv the bare unit starts at 775k what were they thinking!?

    kung second hand ka just go with the l300

  6. #16

    Default Re: Mitsubishi L300 FB or SUZUKI Multicab FB

    ok..up for Mitsubishi L300.. hehe

  7. #17

    Default Re: Mitsubishi L300 FB or SUZUKI Multicab FB

    L300 sab para nko....

  8. #18

    Default Re: Mitsubishi L300 FB or SUZUKI Multicab FB

    anyone tried this brand already?...another option pud kun brandnew nya limited budget hehe
    http://www.focusventures.com.ph/vehi...p?vehicle_id=7


  9. #19

    Default Re: Mitsubishi L300 FB or SUZUKI Multicab FB

    @MK

    that's a chinese brand right? natagam nako anang mga chinese brand.. most of them are underpowered and very uncomfortable ride pa jud.. siguro kung tibay pa na ila mga engines just like L300 basin mu consider pa ko..

  10. #20

    Default Re: Mitsubishi L300 FB or SUZUKI Multicab FB

    murag dili ni barat na company bay.
    they have joint venture with Suzuki actually...so mao na na ang ila multicab looks the same sa Suzuki.
    considering na daghan spare-parts are made in China murag pareha ra na hehe...

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chang'an_Automobile_Group

  11.    Advertisement

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
about us
We are the first Cebu Online Media.

iSTORYA.NET is Cebu's Biggest, Southern Philippines' Most Active, and the Philippines' Strongest Online Community!
follow us
#top