neither do i....but the concept of that renders much to marx's ideals to create an inverted social class...what you want is that, one's production is to his own because there is free market, and not one can use your money for the benefit of the others...however, in reality lobbyist are creatures creeping down to gain even more. that's why, we can not escape reality. liberalism is only applicable to the US. but us? naaah, democracy is just even a word of control from the higher ups.
Last edited by brian joshua; 12-29-2011 at 03:58 PM.
i am not even a fan of democracy.... I want the individual to earn his own and spends on his own where he sees the biggest benefit. That is so different from Marx's socialism. There would be no one dictating where the money should be best spent but the individuals themselves... Voluntary exchange is the name of the game without government sucking much from anybody's harvest. Because our system right now is leading towards perpetual increase in taxation. Don't you agree?
that is marx, what you meant is lenin's...economists agree with voluntary exchange, it's just that, im not an economist im just a lone individual that happens to pass by hehe let's call it a neo-voluntary excange mechanics wherein the gov't inserts just to regulate something that is to be regulated between transaction from the producer and the consumer, that fine with you?
nope, i am not agreeable with government intervention in voluntary exchange...because there will never be a line drawn that would limit the government's meddling.... On what aspects should warrant government intervention?
by the way sir, we have already been warned about getting off topic heheh
this is total apostasy..
if mo pasar ni sa senate. Daghan pud mga bading nga mo gara and mag salig ani. But right pud ni nila.

What if magbuhat nalang ug kaugalingong relihiyon ning mga LGBT? Para didto, FREE sila to do their same-*** marriage thinggy....![]()
Similar Threads |
|