The burden of proof...

[mark__012590]

---

... lies on religion.

If you propose the existence of something, you should use the scientific method in defense of its existence.

Otherwise, I have no reason to listen to you.

[mark__012590]

An example.

If you propose the existence of God, you should use the scientific method in defense of its existence. There should be observations, tests, analysis, before you come up with the right conclusion.

Otherwise, if you'll jump up with the conclusions without going to any methods, there's no reason for me to listen to you.

[cliff_drew]

Where's your scientific method, mark/florigaga? Otherwise, we too don't have reason to listen to you (same as what you've said).

[Saint_hard]

ok..thats not a problem....go on don't listen

[mark__012590]

Where's your scientific method, mark/florigaga? Otherwise, we too don't have reason to listen to you (same as what you've said).

Is there something I should prove?

[addbotroll]

okay. now what?

[cliff_drew]

Is there something I should prove?

Yes, you are the TS so I/we will be glad to hear your scientific explanation first. You can use your example -- the existence of God. If you have posted your scientific method or analysis before, could you post it back here?

[mark__012590]

That's what I posted, if you got no evidence of a God, and if you won't use the scientific method in defending the existence of your God then might as well quit jumping to conclusions.

[Scott Bernard]

Another nonsense thread... If inyo ning tubayan hasta pod kamo mahimo nang nonsense...

[mark__012590]

There's no way this thread could be considered nonsense.

This thread is more sensible than other threads posted here in this section (example - UFO sighting in Cebu which is definitely a false news)

OT: I was wondering what the TS of that thread was smoking