Lets just wait for James Webb Telescope, maybe by that time all your questions will be answered.
Lets just wait for James Webb Telescope, maybe by that time all your questions will be answered.
yeah.. you mentioned it in the first place. LOL
if your irritated by the word 'GOD' why can't you just let them be and let the mods do their work? Purpose is.. your just trying to troll again, using a "new" method by opening a discussion that "seems to be feasible for discussing thoughts" . Atheist or non-atheist or anti-theist we don't care.
OnT:
The vastness of space is beyond measure, that's true. But I don't support the idea of "us" being specks of dust and not important dealing with the cosmos. Literally, yes we are just dirt in the sheet of the empty space, yet the thought of how we rationally support the idea of getting "out there" is enough for me to think that "we" are important key species of the universe.
I mean, atoms don't think ya know...
Last edited by moy1moy1; 08-28-2011 at 09:34 PM.
@ TS, the picture you posted, is that already the "edge" of the universe? Naa man gud koy nabasahan mga articles a few years back saying these images were from the time of the Big Bang, therefore, it must be around 12 to 14 billion light years away?
If dili pa na ang edge sa atoang universe, do we need a more powerful telescope so we can catch a glimpse of it? Or is it that the "edge" is just a representation or just a theory that has yet to be proven to exist? Or do we have an 'indefinite" universe?
Flawed imong logic diri bai. Kay kung naa diay mu mention about gravitational theory, nagpasabot diay nga dili tinuod ang gravity? Ang "theory" nga gi mention diri, matud pa sa atong mga higala sa wikipedia, kay "a collection of concepts, including abstractions of observable phenomena expressed as quantifiable properties, together with rules (called scientific laws) that express relationships between observations of such concepts. A scientific theory is constructed to conform to available empirical data about such observations, and is put forth as a principle or body of principles for explaining a class of phenomena."
So ang ipasabot ani, matawag ni ug theory kay ang ilang na obserbar nga mga panghitabo, ni conform man sa mga gi theorize nila nga posible nga cause ani'ng mga panghitabo-a. Dili man buot ipasabot nga kung theory, ga pataka ra sila ug imbento-imbento ug mga butang.
ang akoa lang bah, sa kadugay na sa panahon nga sige ug gamit ang big bang theory na mao ang sinugdanan but until now daghan gihapon ug arguments.. sa definition nga imo g post "a collection of concepts, including ABSTRACTIONS of observable phenomena expressed as quantifiable properties, together with rules (called scientific laws) that express relationships between observations of such concepts"... "abstraction" = concept, idea ang iya antonym is "fact"..gravitation has been proved na bai..basin nakalimot ka nga ang tawag ana karon is just "GRAVITATION" without the "theory"..unsa pa man lain theory nga na prove nah nga naa gihapon theory sa iya pangalan bai?
aside from that, i never said nga nagpataka taka ra cla ug himo or imbento imbento ug butang..ang akoa ra, nangutana ra ko ngano..I have nothing against Science.In fact, thankful ko sa science coz it made people's life easier..
Similar Threads |
|