conspiracy theories

[treize]

---

I can manipulate the light myself. but angles don't lie.
We measure distant objects using angles and with very high precision.
How do you think we measured the distance between earth and the moon?

So if the angles were wrong.it only means something was really wrong.
And the angles of the shadows was not right.
but these guys can think of everything for excuse.
Their special effects can fool any average movie goer.
But they cant fool me.

Ngilngiga gud diay nimo doc suheto diay kaayo ka aning mga angle², sa gilay-on, sa reflections. Saludo ko nimo doc.

Kay suheto man ka ani, ibutang ta nga ang naa ka sa moon, the sun is 3 degrees NW while the Earth is 9 degrees NE from your location. Since you are very much knowledgeable about this things I pressumed that you know the distance between you and the sun, you and the earth, you should be able to estimate the lights emitted by the sun and the earth to the moon thad doesn't have a surface/atmosphere like earth as well as the lights emitted from the moon(reflection from the sun and the earth. So my question is: Kindly provide me the exact angle of your shadow.

[rodsky]

Ngilngiga gud diay nimo doc suheto diay kaayo ka aning mga angle², sa gilay-on, sa reflections. Saludo ko nimo doc.

Kay suheto man ka ani, ibutang ta nga ang naa ka sa moon, the sun is 3 degrees NW while the Earth is 9 degrees NE from your location. Since you are very much knowledgeable about this things I pressumed that you know the distance between you and the sun, you and the earth, you should be able to estimate the lights emitted by the sun and the earth to the moon thad doesn't have a surface/atmosphere like earth as well as the lights emitted from the moon(reflection from the sun and the earth. So my question is: Kindly provide me the exact angle of your shadow.

I know this question is for SD, but you have to clarify certain points of your question before he can give a valid answer:

a) 3 degrees from NW from what? The lunar horizon?

b) What does the position of the earth have anything to do with the calculation of shadows, when all you need to calculate a shadow is a light source (i.e. sun) and a surface to cast that shadow upon (in this case the surface of the moon)? Ergo, the position of the earth can be disregarded in this problem.

c) You people keep talking about angles of shadows when in fact, the more important (and measurable) data is the length of shadows. Because obviously the answer to the angle by which you are referring to would necessarily be the angle of the sun from the lunar horizon, and in this case, 3 degrees! Ergo, length of the shadow is the more critical value here.

For more enlightenment: Clavius: Photo Analysis - terrain and shadow

Clavius: Photo Analysis - different shadow lengths

-RODION

[Soul Doctor]

Ngilngiga gud diay nimo doc suheto diay kaayo ka aning mga angle², sa gilay-on, sa reflections. Saludo ko nimo doc.

Kay suheto man ka ani, ibutang ta nga ang naa ka sa moon, the sun is 3 degrees NW while the Earth is 9 degrees NE from your location. Since you are very much knowledgeable about this things I pressumed that you know the distance between you and the sun, you and the earth, you should be able to estimate the lights emitted by the sun and the earth to the moon thad doesn't have a surface/atmosphere like earth as well as the lights emitted from the moon(reflection from the sun and the earth. So my question is: Kindly provide me the exact angle of your shadow.

for your information, the earth does not reflect light to the moon.
Your getting your facts wrong.
it is the moon that reflects the sun's light to earth.
because it has no atmosphere thus it acts like a mirror and is able to reflect sunlight.

Why cant the earth reflect sunlight to the moon?
because the earth has an atmosphere.
That prevents light from being reflected away.

The reflection from the boots of the astronauts in that photo was a focused light at close distance, it was a directed light. not a reflected light.

[Soul Doctor]

I know this question is for SD, but you have to clarify certain points of your question before he can give a valid answer:

a) 3 degrees from NW from what? The lunar horizon?

b) What does the position of the earth have anything to do with the calculation of shadows, when all you need to calculate a shadow is a light source (i.e. sun) and a surface to cast that shadow upon (in this case the surface of the moon)? Ergo, the position of the earth can be disregarded in this problem.

c) You people keep talking about angles of shadows when in fact, the more important (and measurable) data is the length of shadows. Because obviously the answer to the angle by which you are referring to would necessarily be the angle of the sun from the lunar horizon, and in this case, 3 degrees! Ergo, length of the shadow is the more critical value here.

For more enlightenment: Clavius: Photo Analysis - terrain and shadow

Clavius: Photo Analysis - different shadow lengths

-RODION

the length of the shadow is as important as the angle.
remember TRIGONOMETRY.
both angles and lengths or distance are equally important in solving problems in TRIGO..
But take note, angles and length of shadows can be affected by topography of the surface.
Or maybe Rodsky knows this already.

[pinoy_09]

If you are a christian.
You could easily swear and put your hand in the bible if you are telling the truth.
They do it in the court room.

But in this scene.
Somebody with a bible walk to Neil Armstong and ask him to swear to a bible that he walked on the moon.
Armstrong could never do it.
Why?
If he could just be a sport and did it, it would all be over then.

Criminals swear to a bible in court and lie anyway.
But why cant he swear to a bible that he walked on the moon?
Ask yourself that!
Do you need to google just to answer this one pinoy_09?

YouTube - ‪Neil Armstrong Wont Swear On The Bible‬‏

Swearing on the Bible is so stone age. lol... Swearing on the Bible is just a symbol; it doesn't mean anything.

Have you seen the video? Obviously Neil refused to take the bully. Why would someone as intelligent as NEIL ARMSTRONG take the bait and stoop down to the level of this guy in the video?

[Soul Doctor]

Swearing on the Bible is so stone age. lol... Swearing on the Bible is just a symbol; it doesn't mean anything.

Have you seen the video? Obviously Neil refused to take the bully. Why would someone as intelligent as NEIL ARMSTRONG take the bait and stoop down to the level of this guy in the video?

All his life neil armstrong lived on the shadow of doubt.
A lot of people think he never walked on the moon.
That scene there was his symbolic redemption.

Even Armstrong himself states that the reason why he doesn't want a celebrity status is because he doesn't deserve it. Since when is the first man to walk on the moon not deserving to be a celebrity.
Unless he never did walk on the moon.

[rodsky]

All his life neil armstrong lived on the shadow of doubt.
A lot of people think he never walked on the moon.
That scene there was his symbolic redemption.

Even Armstrong himself states that the reason why he doesn't want a celebrity status is because he doesn't deserve it. Since when is the first man to walk on the moon not deserving to be a celebrity.
Unless he never did walk on the moon.

Have you read this book?



Amazon.com: First Man: The Life of Neil A. Armstrong (9780743256315): James R. Hansen: Books

I have a copy Doc. Before you make hasty generalizations, please read the book, I'll let you borrow it, before you make sweeping allegations that are contrary to what is written down in print.

-RODION

[THE SKULLS]

Why insist on something that has been repeatedly answered? If you have questions that needs to be answered, why ask us? Can't you google the answers yourself? Or are you just TOO LAZY to do it?

They're all around the internet, you know.

Question: Did men walked in/on the moon?
Common answers: Yes, according to the books, teachers and history
Not so common answer: Not Yet
Another Answer: Never

@ pinoy_69

Do you asked your teacher if the moon landing were real?

[THE SKULLS]

Have you read this book?



Amazon.com: First Man: The Life of Neil A. Armstrong (9780743256315): James R. Hansen: Books

I have a copy Doc. Before you make hasty generalizations, please read the book, I'll let you borrow it, before you make sweeping allegations that are contrary to what is written down in print.

-RODION

I would like to read this book, if you will also read and watch conspiracy theorist novelties about the fake moon-landing. OK?

[rodsky]

...if you will also read and watch conspiracy theorist novelties about the fake moon-landing. OK?

Already did, which is why I can conclude that the logic being used by Apollo Hoax theorists are flawed.

-RODION