conspiracy theories

[THE SKULLS]

---

^well, what if you've clicked the wrong links, heard wrong guys and read and believe the wrong articles?

and who are the wrong guys?
with the wrong links?
and wrong articles?

[Leartes]

im posting back my offer...

one night of healthy debate on conspiracy theories. Im offering 1 case of beer.

i would like to invite soul doctor, the skulls, rodsky, and all the others who would want to join the discussion.
minaw lang ko ha...

[rodsky]

and who are the wrong guys?
with the wrong links?
and wrong articles?

The "wrong guys" are those that have claims without authority and without peer-evaluation from similar scientific entities around the world.

A good analogy is this:

Would you rob a bank? If you're not desperate or crazy, naturally your response would be, "Of course not!"

Why? "Because it is against the law!"

Who said it's against the law? "The people in government or the authorities!"

Then, stopping at this point, what you just said (i.e. "Who are the wrong guys, with the wrong links?") implies that the links that people like me share in this thread are "possibly false" or "not authoritative". But that's just like saying that "Cebu City Police are NOT authoritative!" or "The Philippine Army is NOT an authority!" so then, THE_SKULLS, perhaps you should rob a bank, because you can always argue that the local police and army cannot possibly arrest you because "these guys could be wrong--they could NOT be authoritative"...kay kinsa man nag declare sa ila bi nga dapat "authorized" sila manakop nimo if you robbed a bank? Naturally, a MAJORITY of citizens have declared that they are in fact, the authorities, even if a handful of crazy crooks believe that they are not in authority.

Same thing with your allegations that our links are NOT "authoritative" or "cannot be trusted" (when in fact, the links we share are indeed sources of authority that has been peer-evaluated by a MAJORITY of various scientific communities around the world)...you're just like expressing a mistrust for the police or the army.

So again, you might as well rob a bank, if you really believe in what you're saying.

-RODION

[pinoy_09]

even if a handful of crazy crooks believe that they are not in authority.

And by "crazy crooks" in this analogy, do you mean the conspiracy theorists?

[pinoy_09]

What are you saying?
if i was not there,
then i have no right to analyze the situation?

I didn't say you have no right to analyze the situation. You can analyze it all you want, but that doesn't make your ANALYSIS credible. What expertise do you have? Do you have a PhD? Are you even qualified to work for the FBI? Hehehehe. May I know your occupation? Coz you seem to have a lot of free time posting here. Why am I not seeing you working for the NBI or FBI?

There are videos.
There are testimonies.
It was all over the TV all over the world.
I was watching it on TV.
And as soon as the building fell, I knew it was a controlled demolition
I just dont know at that moment why.
But I was sure then that it was a controlled demolition.
But now that I know why, Im 100% sure it was not a terrorist attack as they claimed.

Ah, kanus-a man tawn na na credible ang imong mga nakita sa TV uy? Kita naka Transformers? Basin mag tuo nya ka tinuod to ang mga robot ha?

Bai. kung ikaw ang imbestigador,
Bisan tua pa ka didto, dili jud ka sulbad.
Sirado man kag utok.

I wasn't there but my mom was. Even my mom thinks it was an attack. So kinsa man akong tuohan, ang mga experts ug ang mga taw nga tua didto mismo, or ikaw nga sa TV ra nakatan-aw? Go figure...

[BeerBreeze]

Just checked out the videos. Well, I still do believe that man landed on the moon but the broadcast that they sent was a fake.

[pinoy_09]

Its time to welcome other thinkers here.

Would you believe me when I say that:

I can "go to the moon and back" alone
without a lunar module.
Just give me a round trip ticket to antartica and access to a nuclear plant.

So, how will you do it? Share the information here. Now is your time to prove that you are not at all CRAZY. Share here how you can go to the moon and back using a nuclear plant and a trip to Antarctica. I would love to hear it.

[CocoCrunch]

So, how will you do it? Share the information here. Now is your time to prove that you are not at all CRAZY. Share here how you can go to the moon and back using a nuclear plant and a trip to Antarctica. I would love to hear it.

another conspiracy in the making. let's debunk it now.lol

[treize]

Just checked out the videos. Well, I still do believe that man landed on the moon but the broadcast that they sent was a fake.

Which video is fake?

[rodsky]

Which video is fake?

That's a very good question, because he has to go through ALL this footage to tell us the answer:

AP11 - July 1969
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/video11.html

AP12 - November 1969
Apollo 12 Video Library

AP14 - Jan 1971
Apollo 14 Video Library

AP15 - July 1971
Apollo 15 Video Library

AP16 - April 1972
Apollo 16 Video Library

AP17 - December 1972
Apollo 17 Video Library

-RODION