An Open Letter to God

[vipvip68]

---

This is one example sa tawo nga Nagpaka arun ingnun Atheist pero diay ANTI-GOD, di Mutoo ug Ginoo pero gi question an BUHAT sa Ginoo.

So, we should not question his order to kill people who work on the Sabbath?

Or is this another of those "Let's not take THIS part of the bible literally" excuses?

[yiennahs]

exodus 31:15

For six days, work is to be done, but the seventh day is a Sabbath of rest, holy to the LORD. Whoever does any work on the Sabbath day must be put to death.

kana gikan na sa bible!

mao d.i na ang morality para ninyo? ang mupatay mu ug tawo kung dili mu-observe ug sabbath? saon na lang ang mga security guards, call cenner agents, mga saleslady? yaw ko ingna pangpatyun sad na ninyo kay naa man diha gibutang sa inyong bibliya? aw, klaro na kaayong binuang!

nya mao ng matawag ninyo nga absolute morality? gi-ach na lang!

can you please give me a source kanang gipamatay kay wa nanimba pag sabbath?

ang nabaw-an man gud naku kay "Thou shall not kill"

[SioDenz]

Our church laws are largely based on interpretations by bible scholars and encyclicals issued by church leaders like the pope...

Do you mean to say that these encyclicals are flawed?

How can you be sure that what you currently know as "absolute morality" today will not be revised again in the future when the bible is again reinterpreted to match the sign of the times by these theologians and church leaders?

what do you mean Our Church Laws, I thought you're an Atheist? So your an Atheist but follows the Church Laws?

I don't care about their interpretations, I can read the Bible for my self and understand it by the Help of God. We are talking about God and the Bible Not Religion.

Im sure that My Absolute guide or Morality that I follow Today from the Bible will Not change or revised in the future because i don't think the Content of the BIBLE will be revised or changed soon. Only the Followers can change what they think or interpret but the word of God in the Bible will be absolute and eternal.

[vipvip68]

can you please give me a source kanang gipamatay kay wa nanimba pag sabbath?

ang nabaw-an man gud naku kay "Thou shall not kill"

Yet another inconsistency in the bible...

What can you expect from several books compiled by a committee of people.


Mao ni mga common arguments nasad by theists:

1. Obsolete na na' ang old testament, new testament na karon (if that is the case, why don't we just take out all the books sa old testament since outdated na man kaha)

2. You shouldn't take THAT particular part of the bible literally (but you should take literally all the other parts that we can defend)... Picking and choosing again.

[vipvip68]

what do you mean Our Church Laws, I thought you're an Atheist? So your an Atheist but follows the Church Laws?

I am a Roman Catholic by Birth.... so I'm still part of that Church unless you want to excommunicate me..

I don't care about their interpretations, I can read the Bible for my self and understand it by the Help of God. We are talking about God and the Bible Not Religion.

So you don't believe in church leaders like priests and the pope? BLASPHEMY!!! lol

Pwede nasad ka ma excommunicate ana' lol.. pareha na ta.

Im sure that My Absolute guide or Morality that I follow Today from the Bible will Not change or revised in the future because i don't think the Content of the BIBLE will be revised or changed soon. Only the Followers can change what they think or interpret but the word of God in the Bible will be absolute and eternal.

Ok.. so which parts are to be taken literally or symbolically?

[yiennahs]

Yet another inconsistency in the bible...

What can you expect from several books compiled by a committee of people.


Mao ni mga common arguments nasad by theists:

1. Obsolete na na' ang old testament, new testament na karon (if that is the case, why don't we just take out all the books sa old testament since outdated na man kaha)

2. You shouldn't take THAT particular part of the bible literally (but you should take literally all the other parts that we can defend)... Picking and choosing again.

it's okay nobody is perfect
inconsistencies are expected kay mga taw rana dayun kapoy sgeg suwat ah

God is not the one who wrote the bible but people who have witnessed it. Kung perfect ang bible then there would be no use in arguing right?

God did not pass Himself through writing, it was through His deeds.

[SioDenz]

So, we should not question his order to kill people who work on the Sabbath?

Or is this another of those "Let's not take THIS part of the bible literally" excuses?

Its Not an Excuse, its Nonsense to justify the works of God to you if you don't believe in God in the first place because wala tay common ground. Now ingna ko nga nituo ka nga naay Ginoo pero wala lang ka kauyun sa iyang gipangbuhat kay I will gladly answer all your question about sa nahisulat sa Bibliya.

[vipvip68]

it's okay nobody is perfect
inconsistencies are expected kay mga taw rana dayun kapoy sgeg suwat ah

So can we say that what's written in the bible isn't exactly the word of God... instead what is written is Man's interpretation of God?

Interpretations by Man are subject to errors... so how can the bible accurately reflect God's words in that case? Ka klaro na ana nga daghan kaayog sayop sa bible.

God is not the one who wrote the bible but people who have witnessed it. Kung perfect ang bible then there would be no use in arguing right?

God did not pass Himself through writing, it was through His deeds.

I still think that the best way to honor God is through helping others instead of wasting time worshiping him.

[SioDenz]

I am a Roman Catholic by Birth.... so I'm still part of that Church unless you want to excommunicate me..

So which Law do you follow karun? law sa catholic or Law sa Atheist? or law sa Anti-God?

So you don't believe in church leaders like priests and the pope? BLASPHEMY!!! lol

Pwede nasad ka ma excommunicate ana' lol.. pareha na ta.

Im Not a Catholic so Dili ko ma excommunicate. Nganu mag huwat paman ka nga ma excommunicate? I renounce nah na imu pagka Theist, remove your connection to that religion and start a new Life.

Ok.. so which parts are to be taken literally or symbolically?

Ingna sah ko nga nituo ka ug Ginoo pero wa lang ka kauyun sa iyang mga buhat kay para matubag taka ana.

[vipvip68]

Its Not an Excuse, its Nonsense to justify the works of God to you if you don't believe in God in the first place because wala tay common ground. Now ingna ko nga nituo ka nga naay Ginoo pero wala lang ka kauyun sa iyang gipangbuhat kay I will gladly answer all your question about sa nahisulat sa Bibliya.

I'm actually open to the possibility of God existing but not necessarily in the religious and biblical sense.

I think the bible isn't valid given its history.. it is at best just some other person's understanding of God a long long time ago.

Scientists can probably write a better "Bible" so to speak... incorporating what we now know today.