
Originally Posted by
vipvip68
We don't find your evidence acceptable... especially the bible because if your follow history, its formation was questionable.
To base all your beliefs from a source of questionable integrity is a slippery slope. Like a house built on shifting sand.
You are free to believe what you want to believe but as far as your evidence goes, we are not convinced of it.
Pareha ra nang sturyaa if I say nga I believe we were created by a spaghetti monster and I have this book that proves it. Why should I make the issue about believing and not believing the spaghetti monster na just because ako ra ang nag himo himo ana based on the book I have on it.
Ako may nag tuo nga naay spaghetti monster... diba ako dapat mu prove ana ninyo.. then I have to prove it based on something nga mu tuo mo which is the book.... pero when you question the validity of the book, I will say that it was written by people who were inspired about the spaghetti monster. In the end... wala gyud concrete proof.
Science is limited because people are limited. We have to humble ourselves and accept those limitations and not make up stories about things that we don't really know anything about and claim to know how everything works.
It might put everyone else at ease but we could also be misleading everyone nga mag suwito suwito...
Wala lagi mu ni agree sa explanation sa Bibliya, Pero ang dakung pangutana dha unsa inyu basis sa pag dis agree ninyu? SCIENCE inyu rason nya muangkon mu SCIENCE dili ka explain tanan butang, maayu kaha na paminawaun?
Sama raman na ig magpa konsulta ka nya i Xray ka sa Doctor:
Doc: WALA kay cancer.
Ikaw: Doc wala ko cancer?
Doc: Wala kay cancer kay OK man sa imu Xray
Ikaw: Nya maka kita na sa tanan sakit ang Xray?
Doc: DILI nuon.