Questions for the Atheists

[kajrot1]

---

taasa na sa discussion dah ^_^ very well said kay YANONG dah^_^...

[SioDenz]

You also have to understand the psychology behind Atheism.
Why do people become atheist.

I've known a lot of atheist personally.
And I came up with my own common factors on atheists.

1. They hate their fathers.
They question their father's judgment.
They found them too controlling.
They are too strict and too religious.

No, They want to be God themselves. They want to do things according to what They THINK.

Hiltler, Stalin, Lenin, Mao, Kim Jong iL, Kim il Sung, and Polpot of Cambodia are some of the example of true Atheist - they want to be God and decide things according to what they THINK what is right WITHOUT following the so-called "Universal Morality" influenced by people who believed in God.

[yanong_banikanhon]

Kinsay nag ingon nga immaterial is lack of plausible natural explanation?

Ikaw bitaw nag-ingon ana, bay. Mao ni imong giingon ay:

It lacks a plausible natural explanation (hence the word "immaterial")

Ayaw gani pag sige og binuang diha, brad. Hehehe...

Therefore, kaning imong gi ingon nga "mind beyond the material world", walay plausible natural explanation ana. Kay wala ma'y plausible natural explanation, kini imong giingon nga "immaterial mind" gi nganlan nimo ug "GOD" --- god of the gaps. Gets ka?

How about kaning inyong assumption nga: THE ONLY way to recognize the TRUTH is through LOGIC

Unsa man pud ang plausible natural proof ana? Duna na bay scientific experiment nga makapamatuod anang maong assumption?

Mao ra ba na'y basis sa inyong pagsupak2x. Kun atong sundon kanang imong pangatarungan, it would appear nga ang basis sa inyong pagtoo is the logic of the gaps.

[SPRINGFIELD_XD_40]

I have a question sa mga resident ATHEIST nato if ever we have some or kadtong inclined to be ATHEIST gyud sila mapa soft or hard .

IF EVER YOU GUYS DECIDE TO BECOME THEIST , WHICH GOD WOULD YOU BELIEVE AND RECOGNIZE ? WHY ?

Thank you daan if mo answer mo and please , ayaw saguli ug yagaw if di kamo ang mo answer .

[pinoy_09]

Ikaw bitaw nag-ingon ana, bay. Mao ni imong giingon ay:



Ayaw gani pag sige og binuang diha, brad. Hehehe...

Please don't twist the story so it favors you.

I said "It lacks a plausible natural explanation (hence the word "immaterial").

HENCE is different from IS.

Kasabot ka unsay pasabot sa hence?

[yanong_banikanhon]

Please don't twist the story so it favors you.

I said "It lacks a plausible natural explanation (hence the word "immaterial").

HENCE is different from IS.

Kasabot ka unsay pasabot sa hence?

Kasabot kaayo, bay oy.

hence
adv.
1. For this reason; therefore:
ex. handmade and hence expensive. (it is expensive because it is handmade)

So kanang imong gisulti nga:

It lacks a plausible natural explanation (hence the word "immaterial")

Pareha ra na og meaning sa:

It is immaterial because it lacks plausible natural explanation.

Mao na naka-ingon ko nagbuot2x kag himo og definition anang word nga immaterial. Ayaw lagi sige binuang, bay.

[yanong_banikanhon]

Anyway, balik ta sa akong pangutana.

Kaning inyong assumption nga: THE ONLY way to recognize the TRUTH is through LOGIC

Unsa man pud ang plausible natural proof ana? Duna na bay scientific experiment nga makapamatuod anang maong assumption? Kun wala, dili kaha ang basis sa inyong pagtoo is the logic of the gaps?

[pinoy_09]

Kasabot kaayo, bay oy.

hence
adv.
1. For this reason; therefore:
ex. handmade and hence expensive. (it is expensive because it is handmade)

So kanang imong gisulti nga:

It lacks a plausible natural explanation (hence the word "immaterial")

Pareha ra na og meaning sa:

It is immaterial because it lacks plausible natural explanation.

Mao na naka-ingon ko nagbuot2x kag himo og definition anang word nga immaterial. Ayaw lagi sige binuang, bay.

But by using the word "hence", does that define the word "immaterial"?

I was referring to the word "immaterial" as being outside of the natural world, that's why it I said it lacks plausible natural explanation. How can you explain something of spiritual realms using a natural explanation? Please tell.

[pinoy_09]

Anyway, balik ta sa akong pangutana.

Kaning inyong assumption nga: THE ONLY way to recognize the TRUTH is through LOGIC

Unsa man pud ang plausible natural proof ana? Duna na bay scientific experiment nga makapamatuod anang maong assumption? Kun wala, dili kaha ang basis sa inyong pagtoo is the logic of the gaps?

Wa pa gani ka katubag sa akong pangutana nya mangutana na hinuon ka?

Ayaw lagi sige binuang, bay.

[yanong_banikanhon]

But by using the word "hence", does that define the word "immaterial"?

In this sentence: It lacks a plausible natural explanation (hence the word "immaterial"), it does.

Hence means for this reason. I-substitute nato na sa imong original statement aron imong ma-klaro: It lacks a plausible natural explanation (for this reason it is immaterial) .

How can you explain something of spiritual realms using a natural explanation? Please tell.

You should ask that question to yourself and to your fellow atheists. Kay inyo baya nang pagtoo nga ang tanan dunay natural explanation.

So, balik ta sa akong pangutana.

Kaning inyong assumption nga: THE ONLY way to recognize the TRUTH is through LOGIC

Unsa man pud ang plausible natural proof ana? Duna na bay scientific experiment nga makapamatuod anang maong assumption? Kun wala, dili kaha ang basis sa inyong pagtoo is the logic of the gaps?

Tubaga, ha. Ayaw og likay2x.