Everything about : RH Bill ( Reproductive Health Bill)

[Romeojin]

5 words....

Age-appropriate-reproductive-health-education.

with or without *** ed...

whether the teen will heed to no abstinence from Church, parents, or *** ed instructors or whoever...

the issue is they have RH rights, they can ask for contraceptives without discrimination.... you putting moral authority at risk. Its like opening a manhole and pray no one fall in it.

[GemWArrioR]

why would you buy condom if you not gonna use it? kung tig 100 ang condom and you buy it, will you not used it?

why asked for condoms, if you not gonna use it? explain.

people buy/ask contraceptives cause they have urge to have ***.

the gun thing is different, cause you cant just freely shoot people.

here is the evidence of a clear case of close minder person.....
The meaning of the gun analogy just as bronson mention.. "CHOICE", o wa pa ka gets?

its a choice to use it or not, a choice to engage to s-x or not....

[Romeojin]

BANG.... naa ba nakasaad sa RH Bill kay tungod na overpopulated ta.. ? no.. it's for economic reason. it is to slow down the population growth, not to stop it....

mao bitaw ingon nako sa mga pro RH dire na pataka ra ug yawit na "overpopulated na ang pinas dapat mag RHB na"

[simoncpu]

pangutana ana naa ba kay lovelife at that time? or kwarta para prosti?
it takes two to tango.


------

tan-awa naa man gani programa ani sauna, nganong dli man ni i continue? ngano kailangan pa man mag craft ug bill with many flaws?

Klaro kaayo pildi na ka sa imong argument. Klaro kaayo nga easy access to condoms don't lead to promiscuity. You don't have further arguments to back up your claims.

Check out POPCOM :: About Us :: Agency Mandate. During Ramos' time, PopCom was empowered to implement its mandate of managing our population growth. When Erap and GMA came, however, they kowtowed to the Roman Catholic church so the population control policy was changed to promote "natural family planning, birth spacing and breastfeeding" instead. We need to change this nonsense.

[unsay_ngalan_nimo]

needs a law but not necessary that of RHB..

and what kind of law do you want? a more comprehensive Health related law?

RHB is about reproductive health.

[Romeojin]

here is the evidence of a clear case of close minder person.....
The meaning of the gun analogy just as bronson mention.. "CHOICE", o wa pa ka gets?

its a choice to use it or not, a choice to engage to s-x or not....

mangayo or mopalit gani condom or contraceptives dili na hiunon gamiton? maypa wa siya nag waste ug money or didnt bother to ask for contraceptives.

ang gun analogy is different. cause you can buy a gun but you are not license to kill.

[bronson]

technically we are following the footsteps of US and UK and other countries open to contraceptives in school.

The issue is ok to give contraceptives to those who needs it for family planning but why should we allow adolescent? when we are telling them not to engage nga into ***.

and unsa man pud buhaton ng parents if they know that their teen had asked for contraceptives? when it is said in the bill that "there should be no discrimination" to the extent that "they will eradicate discriminatory practices" (forgot the exact words). The parents of the teen (who asked for contraceptives) are much more likely to get fined and/or imprisoned for prohibiting it.

The difference are: contraceptives are free and moral authority of the parents is at risked cause the bill anti-discrimination policy.

Why cant they not enforce strictly when the bill intended to make people responsible and aware ? this is accdg to your fellow pro RH.

Yes, No discrimination but does not mean it is acceptable sa imong religion or culture. Ang pag kaon ug baboy dili man na bawal pero nganu man nga bawal sa uban religion? So mu-reklamo sila sa ilang mga Pastor or Imam kung nganung gi bawal? Diha na mu-kick in ang effectivity sa imong religion ug culture kung unsa ilang itudlo na morally acceptable ug dili acceptable. Again, Kita tanan naay reproductive system so pasabot magkinahanglan gyud ta ug RH SERVICES sooner or later bisan bata pa ka. Kung wala kay ika gasto, then diha na mutabang ang programa sa imo.

And again, ni mention ka ug strictly pero wala nasad nimo gi apil ang abstinence only. What I said was the state cannot enforce a strict ABSTINENCE ONLY program. pasabot, dili nila pwede i-bawal ang pag gamit ug legal contraceptives. Kay ang stand for Abstinence ONLY is sa Catholic church and maybe some other religious groups but NOT ALL religious groups. So ang mahitabo ana, mu reklamo ang uban groups na ni pabor ang state sa pipila ka religion. Which is dili pwede sa separation of church and state. Kuha na nimo?
Ang RH bill dili man na abstinence only and dili sad na strictly enforced kay gitagaan ra man ka ug choice.

[bronson]

why would you buy condom if you not gonna use it? kung tig 100 ang condom and you buy it, will you not used it?

why asked for condoms, if you not gonna use it? explain.

people buy/ask contraceptives cause they have urge to have ***.

the gun thing is different, cause you cant just freely shoot people.

sayop ko basa.. sayop ako comment. sori

[GemWArrioR]

mangayo or mopalit gani condom or contraceptives dili na hiunon gamiton? maypa wa siya nag waste ug money or didnt bother to ask for contraceptives.

ang gun analogy is different. cause you can buy a gun but you are not license to kill.

Bang again.. a close minded person... its their "choice"......
buy a gun, pwede ra ipang display, dili gamiton.. mao na....

its the same with RH Bill, a freedom to choose kung muoyon ka o di.. it depends on you

[simoncpu]

Yes, No discrimination but does not mean it is acceptable sa imong religion or culture. Ang pag kaon ug baboy dili man na bawal pero nganu man nga bawal sa uban religion? So mu-reklamo sila sa ilang mga Pastor or Imam kung nganung gi bawal? Diha na mu-kick in ang effectivity sa imong religion ug culture kung unsa ilang itudlo na morally acceptable ug dili acceptable. Again, Kita tanan naay reproductive system so pasabot magkinahanglan gyud ta ug RH SERVICES sooner or later bisan bata pa ka. Kung wala kay ika gasto, then diha na mutabang ang programa sa imo.

And again, ni mention ka ug strictly pero wala nasad nimo gi apil ang abstinence only. What I said was the state cannot enforce a strict ABSTINENCE ONLY program. pasabot, dili nila pwede i-bawal ang pag gamit ug legal contraceptives. Kay ang stand for Abstinence ONLY is sa Catholic church and maybe some other religious groups but NOT ALL religious groups. So ang mahitabo ana, mu reklamo ang uban groups na ni pabor ang state sa pipila ka religion. Which is dili pwede sa separation of church and state. Kuha na nimo?
Ang RH bill dili man na abstinence only and dili sad na strictly enforced kay gitagaan ra man ka ug choice.

Dili sad ko mo-sugot ug abstinence only oi! Kalami ana?! Nganong mag-abstain pa man ta?