The Code of LOVE

[kuyabog]

---

LOVE CAN NOT EXTEND ITSELF INTO MARRIAGE
This is because lovers must grant everything to one another, mutually and gratuitously, without being constrained by any motive of necessity. Husband and wife, on the other hand, are bound by duty to deny each other nothing.

Considering that no one should be deprived of love, BEING MARRIED MUST NOT PREVENT ONE FROM SEEKING IT ELSEWHERE. The only requirements of extramarital lovers are that they are honest, they are truly exciting and the have achieved adulthood. An insatiable appetite of one partner for the other is considered ideal.

NO DEVICE IS TOO EXTREME IF IT KEEPS THIS PASSION ALIVE. MAINTAINING A SECRET AFFAIR MAY BE FAVORABLE, not so much for the sake of decency as for the sake of excitement. Whoever cannot keep a secret cannot love. Guarded jealousy may also be useful. And though we are not specifically recommending or even condoning the employment of force, a resisting lover is always more desirable.

No one can be ultimately involved with two lovers at the same time. But just as nothing restricts one man from an affair with two women, NOTHING PREVENTS ONE WOMAN FROM AN AFFAIR WITH TWO MEN.

Love itself is always in a state of flux, either increasing or diminishing. After it begins to diminish, it dies rapidly. At that time, new love is an adequate excuse to quit the old.

What one loses in sleep over love, one makes up for in what one does not eat. But persons who are either too wealthy or too happy in their own lives tend to lose the need of love. It should also serve as a warning that those who are prone to love are equally prone to fear.

[butong101]

^
that's why im not a fan of marriage..

[twistedANGEL25]

TS, where did you get this?
It's so alarming...

[kuyabog]

actually, I expected two of the most sensible posters would react in this thread...hehehe

@twistedangel: i got this from a very ancient manuscript in fact.. no copy and paste here..but a paraphrasing of such an ancient thought...you may say alarming.. but it is laced with honest truth in between those lines of thought.

@butong: marriage is a trap for fools...i think i said that in one of my posts elsewhere

[butong101]

^
di man sd gyud fool ang mgpakasal bai, kay usahay it makes people sane.. having the thought of having someone whom you can lean on.. etc..

life's survival sometimes needs fantasy among fools..

[butong101]

TS, where did you get this?
It's so alarming...

mo react lang ko ani ha.. hehe

ALARMING ni siya nga post if contextualized with morality..

but i have to agree w/ the text above since it depicts to the purest form of human nature which is pleasure-oriented being..

[farmboy]

mo react lang ko ani ha.. hehe

ALARMING ni siya nga post if contextualized with morality..

but i have to agree w/ the text above since it depicts to the purest form of human nature which is pleasure-oriented being..

that "purest form of human nature" is another way of saying it in one word - honesty

if only we are honest with ourselves first, than observing so-called morality imposed by others upon the masses.

[salbahis]

marriage is a trap for fools...i think i said that in one of my posts elsewhere

so your parents are fools? just asking... coz im also a fool...

HAPPY and FOOL hahahahahaha!!!

[kuyabog]

so your parents are fools? just asking... coz im also a fool...

HAPPY and FOOL hahahahahaha!!!

go get some lens cleaner or something...blurred imo lens noh? unsay connect?

love is a state of flux.. sa tantong ninyo away sa imo partner.. it will have its toll down the road.. there will be erosion..gamay pa ron.. but like i stated in the first post.. when it starts to diminish.. it will die rapidly.. and you myt perhaps remember this thread...

have fun...FOOL!

[hash]

Nagka-goosebumps lagi ku while reading the first post.