it was not only PAG ASA's nor GMA's decision... what do you think of these people, idiots?!Originally Posted by sumaganday
it was not only PAG ASA's nor GMA's decision... what do you think of these people, idiots?!Originally Posted by sumaganday
These "super expensive" hotels are now giving "super discounts." Murag gigabaan ba.Originally Posted by Namnori
Anyway, the ASEAN Summit will push through early next year. For sure, the organizers will make a better preparation for this by January. Their efforts are not at all wasted for the other meetings scheduled pushed through as originally planned. Only the meetings which should have been held which will be affected by Seniang were postponed until next year.
For sure, Cebu will be fully booked with guests early next year.
mean reason is the typhoon...
we are in the construction and real estate development and ventures for 23 years now, and that is normal.Originally Posted by sumaganday
i take it that from the sound of your comments, this is personal for you. are you directly affected? in what way? were you by passed in side transactions or a project was not awarded to you? don't tell me you are just a plain, vigilant cebuano? how caring of you...
Kung madayon sa january...that would mean more chance for cebu to showcase its culture by sinulog......basin diay divine intervention para mosikat pag ayo si Sto. Nino........
Ok ra sad kung matinood ni kay kaayohan ra gihapon sa mga bisita........di ba? Mas managhan na ug samot ang mobisita sa Cebu labi na karong Sinulog....yehey...magbaha na sad ang mga gwpa ani.............
Originally Posted by sumaganday
Was the decision to postpone the summit due to a storm a right decision? Was the storm really the reason why the Summit was postponed?
Before anyone answers YES or NO, consider the following that happened:
- Several provinces have been ravaged by the storm; Boracay was not even spared
- There were some who died and got injured
As of now, all of the government's attention are on the victims of the storm including the ones in Albay which was previously ravaged by Reming.
Had the government pursued with the Summit, would PGMA herself put her focus on it (ASEAN) or at the victims of the storm?
Now that the government is being criticized by some because of the summit's postponement, would the government also be criticized by the same people if the so-called "lavish" summit was pursued in the midst of death and destruction?
Think again.![]()
Was the decision to postpone the summit due to a storm a right decision? Was the storm really the reason why the Summit was postponed?
Before anyone answers YES or NO, consider the following that happened:
- Several provinces have been ravaged by the storm; Boracay was not even spared
- There were some who died and got injured
As of now, all of the government's attention are on the victims of the storm including the ones in Albay which was previously ravaged by Reming.
Had the government pursued with the Summit, would PGMA herself put her focus on it (ASEAN) or at the victims of the storm?
Now that the government is being criticized by some because of the summit's postponement, would the government also be criticized by the same people if the so-called "lavish" summit was pursued in the midst of death and destruction?
Think again.
gipostpone kay naay tulo ang CICC. Pakaulaw lang! Pero how come HR 1450 was approved in the midst of Southern Luzon calamity?
Similar Threads |
|