please don't answer both. just select 1 among the choices. hehe.
please don't answer both. just select 1 among the choices. hehe.
mas nindot man jud to sa church kay mao jud biya nay ganahan sa mga babaye.hehhehe
proud biya sila ana. nga mopaso sila sa altar.
plano baya nako kay, kulang sa panahon mag hikay sa mga church requirements civil nalng usa, then after a week church na kay mao baya dream sa mga bae.
For me, they're both important. We should see both sides and the reason why the couple choose CIVIL instead of other. As what I have observed most of the people really choose to have CHURCH Wedding, firstly because we thought that doing such thing could guide and gave us blessings from ABOVE. Secondly, it's our tradition as a Roman Catholic and for that it's the pride of both family. CIVIL is more on secondary option because considering the different factors: 1. Financial crisis, 2. Family problem, both side, 3. Unwanted pregnancy(nasipyat), and there are a lot more. That's why I am encouraging to all of you right there to have plan both short and long-term plan with your relationship. It's not easy to do but just try to push yourself to its limit. In fact, I was doing it since 2000 with my GF in abroad while I left behind. We should have to sacrifice just because of this words "future planning/long-term plan".
kung naay budget kay church..kung wa gani, practical nlng..civil..
kung walay budget para church samot na tingali ang para pag buhi ug pamilya..Originally Posted by pido
tigum sa before mag kasal2x. hehehe...
church.
it depends
depends on what bai?
Similar Threads |
|