Yes I do.Originally Posted by shoeless_rebel
Yes I do.Originally Posted by shoeless_rebel
Fair enough... the hunger for truth is embedded in human nature. But I am in no position to give you an exact answer to your question. I do offer just some thoughts... If you really want an answer with all the factual proofs, it will be a lot of work. You might have to do all the research, ask all the right questions from all the right people--the historians, the biblical scholars, the archaeologists, all the experts. I honestly don't know how many years that would take. So far no one, and no institution has given us that, and to my knowledge, maybe because of the plain non-existence of resources to back whatever claims arise. Any one can say "Jesus, during his 12th year, helped his father Joseph build furniture. When no orders came, he played with his friends and taught them to play fairly, and to avoid hurting each other. And he said to them "Be merry and play to gladden your youthful hearts, but always look after the good of your friends." The burden of proof, however, that this was so is not as easy as to verbalize it. Today we're short of a prophet to do so. The bottomline is, as I've already opined in my previous post, that I think the knowledge of what actually happened to Jesus during those years is not at all crucial to the gospel of salvation as has been revealed in Sacred Scripture. And it practically applies to everything else in that sense. Knowing those facts would not stop another soul from asking what actually happened to Mary when he was a young girl, or what actually transpired during the 40 days and 40 nights when Jesus was alone in the desert, etc...Originally Posted by pridi
I agree, in the sense that in our fallen natures, we are yet incapable of fully comprehending all the mysteries of God. Even if it's not about God, maboang naman gani ang mga taga NASA everytime they discover something new about mysterious planet X... you get the idea.Originally Posted by pridi
Again I agree, and Jesus' life was the perfect example. That's why all the great saints imitated him and helped us to follow suit by their examples too.Originally Posted by pridi
My answer? Jesus is the truth. Only Jesus said "I am the truth". Only he had the spine to say so. And my proof? The ancient gospel manuscripts exactly has that line. What basis? Based on 2000 years of believing and living to that truth from the time of the apostles until today's Christians. Quote from C.S. Lewis "You must make your choice. Either this man was, and is, the Son of God: or else a madman or something worse."Originally Posted by pridi
peace!
Simple nlng..sa kadako sa oranizaion sa catholic, imposible wala sila kibaw unsa ang mga binuhatan ni JC atong mga panahona?
pero murag dako na porohon ng na practice siya u budhism ug yoga, ang pinaka kara an na practice sa tibo ok kalibotan. I think
hes alowd to do anything when hes stil here in this world as a man. Hes genious ato nga time..i think walay carpernter ato ng
time na pareha ug intellec nya..budhism is wher he practice his senses and how to comunicate to the god the father. simple lang
akon opinion
hiwi kini nga pagrason. bisag unsa pa kadaku tingali, kung walay basihanan nga nagpamatuod nga nagbuhat ni ani o ni ana si JC, wa gyuy mahibaw. kung magsuwat ko ug libro chapter 1-20, pero ni skip ko ug suwat sa chapter 5, bisan unsa pa kadaghan sa mobasa adtung libroha, wala gyud silay insaktong kasayuran unsa kaha ang chapter 5. kung naa man gani silay masulti, unsa man sad ang magpamatoud? ingon ana rasad ka simple para naku.Originally Posted by naomi6000
oki. ako makaingon way porohan. kay JC=God, Buddha=not a god. JC practicing a system that does not believe in a god makes JC less than a god.pero murag dako na porohon ng na practice siya u budhism ug yoga, ang pinaka kara an na practice sa tibo ok kalibotan.
Ummm... I think He can do anything (because he is God) but he cannot contradict his divine nature (perfect and therefore cannot sin, cannot blaspheme himself).I think hes alowd to do anything when hes stil here in this world as a man.
i guess u could say that... for me I would abstain from such thoughtbudhism is wher he practice his senses and how to comunicate to the god the father. simple lang
akon opinion
Ni tan-aw ko ug da vincci code, mura wala may ayo. Hunahuna raman gyud to sa gasulat. Maayo pa ako gadirector ato.hehehe
sakto ka, ala ko kasabot ngano na thret ang church sa davincci na movie. murag wala my ayo, dli man ko religious na pagka tao wala man ko naka conect sa davincci code ug sa atong faith. mag tan aw ko ato ng movie ky mura siya ug Indiana jones, national treasure, lara craft. mau ra..nag to o ko na ako madala ky wala koy basa basa sa bibliya..murag wala gyud ko nadala bisan gamay..mypa ang istigmata or emely rose...
bitaw.. mura ra bitaw og another indiana jones to.. mas maau pa ang stigmata adto..
kadtong stigmata ang dapat nilang kalisangan unta kay mas direct to the point in my opinion..
Bati nga salida, maayo adto nalang ta ko nitan-aw sa x-men kay nindot daw. Sayang2 lang ko sa kao money.
Pero kung naay masuko adto kay ang oppus dei nga grupo kay sa salida ba kay gipasanginlan sila nga mupatay ug tawo, unya naa daw sila ritual nga magsex ang laki ug baye sa atubangan nila unya mag-ilog pa gyud sila sa kwarta gikan sa vatican. Unsa kaha na katinuod no?![]()
Mas maayo pa ug dili nalang na nimo i entertain na nga thought...........
Originally Posted by sexy_summer
IMO: JC is not GOD.. Buddha is not GOD correct.. Buddha = JC correct they are both the same flesh..both practicing to realize GOD..both awakened..
Similar Threads |
|