Gaza War2!!!

[Malic]

---

Dli na cla mahadlok bro.. Didto gani sa Kauswagan.. mga baboy gipang patay ra.. while ang kabayo ug baka mao ang gi pang kawat sa MILF.

and he was there and he saw it all. hahaha!

[Malic]

anyways ceasefire naman so ceasefire sa ako.

and kapoy na ug comment about kung kinsa ang mas maau nga warrior.

basta para nako...gamay ug inferiror tood ang Hamas pero musukol jud.

kana bitaw makakita ta ug boxer nga gamay ug inferior nya muskol ug kusgan ug sakto ug kumo nga kontra, mo biblib man ta,nya mosamot ta ka bilib kung wa jud siya matumba sa superior nga boxer. di ba?


nya para nako...

Hamas did not lose the war and Israel did not win the war pod.

ang looy ang mga civilians pwerte ra ba daghana...tsk tsk...grabe ning Israel.

[mannyamador]

of course they will. They are proud wariors,

They are proud warriors who DELIBERATELY TARGET AND MURDER INNOCENT CIVILIANS. The word for that is TERRORIST.

In the end Hamas will rule Palestine.

So you want cowardly terrorists to rule Palestine? Yeah, right. Do you want them to murder all the Jews too? The nazis would have loved that.

--
Please sign the petition AGAINST the so-called Reproductive Health Bill (HB5043)
http://www.petitiononline.com/xxhb5043/petition.html
.

[Malic]

@mannyamador

Sir kindly do some google and check who killed more civilians: Hamas or the government of Israel?

who told you that Hamas would kill all the Jews? all they want is freedom. They won the election so i think Israel must respect that.

[pspoon_low-end]

balik napud ni? hahahah this time i wont be pointing fingers. sa maigo lang. bato2 sa langit. tamaan wag magalit.

HAHAHA. katawa ko ani dah...

the hamas gunmen lurking inside their bunkers and tunnels while their civilians are out in the open city. hahahhaa what a bunch of courageous men.

y should anyone strip of israels mighty airplanes and armor para ma FAIR and fight toe to toe with hamas nga mga way eroplano ug tangke?

"in war, nothing is fair". so daydream na lang na of having israel give up its tanks to fight hamas.

[Malic]

balik napud ni? hahahah this time i wont be pointing fingers. sa maigo lang. bato2 sa langit. tamaan wag magalit.

HAHAHA. katawa ko ani dah...

the hamas gunmen lurking inside their bunkers and tunnels while their civilians are out in the open city. hahahhaa what a bunch of courageous men.

y should anyone strip of israels mighty airplanes and armor para ma FAIR and fight toe to toe with hamas nga mga way eroplano ug tangke?

"in war, nothing is fair". so daydream na lang na of having israel give up its tanks to fight hamas.

tsk tsk...

obviously this guy quoted my post.

unfortunately this guy mis quoted me.

if one goes back and review the issue the topic was...the other guy said nga cge daw ug tago ang hamas so i responded nga ipakuha ng tangke ug airplanes sa Israel di ba atubangon na sa hamas ang mga soldiers sa israel then on the other point i also said nga kung isog jud ang Israel dili sila palaban sa ilang tangke ug airplanes. Mga militant with inferior weapons then sila superior ilang weapons natural isog sila kay superior man ilang weapon, in other words sukol sila kay superiror ilang weapons,pero kung kuhaa ng tangke ug airplanes asa na musukol.

mao na ang context sa akong statement w/c this guy attempted to mis-quote me.

but it was just an opinion...and i am not dreaming...of course in reaL war nothing is fAIR but you cant claim nga isog ka kay nanago imong kontra,natural manago jud kay superior man ang weapons sa pikas.

ang tinood nga isog ug fearsome kanang musokol bisan high power ang mga gamit sa imong kontra.

[pspoon_low-end]

bisan bali balihun pa o tuyok tuyokun pa ang issue sa gubat, HAMAS FELL ON THEIR KNEES. syaro naman sad di sila maka angkon ana nga naka luhod jud sila sa atake. imagina lang gikan sa 100 to 150 rockets a day sent to israel and since israel attacked gaza, it was reduced to 50 a day.

dont question why israel initiated peace. dont any one of US WANT THAT??

[Malic]

bisan bali balihun pa o tuyok tuyokun pa ang issue sa gubat, HAMAS FELL ON THEIR KNEES. syaro naman sad di sila maka angkon ana nga naka luhod jud sila sa atake. imagina lang gikan sa 100 to 150 rockets a day sent to israel and since israel attacked gaza, it was reduced to 50 a day.

dont question why israel initiated peace. dont any one of US WANT THAT??

kung tinood na nga na reduce into 50, it means nga ni focus na sila sa incoming war.

i dont know kung nganung imo jud i assert nga pildi jud ang hamas. dili naman ni lingaw lingaw imo sir.

pero wa jud sir moluhod kay intact pa man ilang organization. kung niluhod na dili na kinahanglan mo declare ug ceasefire ang Israel kay luhod naman kaha.

basta mao ni akong baruganan...Hamas did not lose the war and Israel did not won the war. Ang looy ang mga civilians.

[pspoon_low-end]

kung tinood na nga na reduce into 50, it means nga ni focus na sila sa incoming war.

i dont know kung nganung imo jud i assert nga pildi jud ang hamas. dili naman ni lingaw lingaw imo sir.

pero wa jud sir moluhod kay intact pa man ilang organization. kung niluhod na dili na kinahanglan mo declare ug ceasefire ang Israel kay luhod naman kaha.

basta mao ni akong baruganan...Hamas did not lose the war and Israel did not won the war. Ang looy ang mga civilians.

yup you are right. walay naka daug.

lahi man ceguro ng naka luhod ka kaysa nag higda na dba? kung nakahigda naka sa gubat, pasabot pildi naka. kung nakaluhod ka sa gubat, it means the capability to govern and attack again is reduced to more or less 50 percent. i didnt say hamas lost or israel won or the other way around. im just saying hamas capabilities got reduced. not completely but at least rocket attacks are depleted.

yup. luoy ang civilians. so since ni initiate ang israel ug peace, time to help the civilians on both sides. NO MORE DOUBTS AND QUESTIONS ASKED AS TO WHY ITS BEING INITIATED and i think its time for both forces to re arm also. maybe in a few days gubat napud ni balik.

[Jerry Michael]

More evidence that the Zionist regime is using chemical weapons. A war crime. They banned the Press to hide their atrocities.

Press, Banned from War Zone, Reports Growing Evidence of Israel Using White Phosphorus in Gaza

By Greg Mitchell

Published: January 15, 2009 1:45 PM ET

NEW YORK For several days, charges that Israel has been using white phosphorus in its Gaza bombing have spread, unconfirmed but gaining some credibility as some human rights groups have weighed in. But today the charges are reaching critical mass in the wake of the bombing of the main United Nations compound in Gaza City.

And newspapers are in the lead in reporting it -- despite the Israeli ban on reporters entering the war zone.

This just in from Reuters:

"A warehouse in a U.N. compound in Gaza that came under Israeli fire on Thursday was apparently hit by white-phosphorus shells, U.N. humanitarian affairs chief John Holmes said. 'The main warehouse was badly damaged by what appeared to be white-phosphorus shells,' Holmes told reporters at a news briefing in New York. 'Those on the ground don't have any doubt that's what they were. If you were looking for confirmation, that looks like it to me.'"

The Times of London reports today:

"The Israeli military has denied using white phosphorus shells in the Gaza offensive, although an investigation by The Times has revealed that dozens of Palestinians in Gaza have sustained serious injuries from the substance, which burns at extremely high temperatures. The Geneva Convention of 1980 proscribes the use of white phosphorus as a weapon of war in civilian areas, although it can be used to create a smokescreen. The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) said today that all weapons used in Gaza were 'within the scope of international law.'"

In fact, the International Red Cross has stated that Israel is certainly using it and Israel's response was a non-denial, a spokesman explaining that the military "wishes to reiterate that it uses weapons in compliance with international law, while strictly observing that they be used in accordance with the type of combat and its characteristics."

The use of white phosphorus as an illuminating device only is okayed by international law but such use is extremely risky and dangerous to civilians. The fires it sets cannot be put out with the usual water or fire extinguishers.

Today, at least two United Nations officials have flatly declared that three or more white phosphorous shells were part of the attack today that set a UN building and compound ablaze in Gaza City. Here is just one of many press reports, just posted by The New York Times:

"A spokesman for the Relief and Works Agency, Christopher Gunness, said that the Israelis had been provided with the GPS coordinates of all United Nations facilities in Gaza. He said that two buildings were ablaze and that there were five fully laden fuel vehicles at the site....

"In the attack on Thursday, Mr. Gunness said, the Israelis used phosphorous shells, according to Bloomberg. The Israelis have shot three phosphorus shells against the compound, where hundreds of civilians are being sheltered,' he was quoted as saying."

Earlier this week The New York Times reported on growing civilian charges of white phosphorus use:

"Luay Suboh, 10, from Beit Lahiya, lost his eyesight and some skin on his face Saturday when, his mother said, a fiery substance clung to him as he darted home from a shelter where his family was staying to pick up clothes. The substance smelled like burned trash, said Ms. Jaawanah, the mother who fled her home in Zeitoun, who had experienced it too. She had no affection for Hamas, but her sufferings were changing that. 'Do you think I'm against them firing rockets now?' she asked, referring to Hamas. 'No. I was against it before. Not anymore.'"

Also this week, Agence France Presse reported:

"Medics in Gaza say they have treated more than 50 people suffering burns caused by controversial white phosphorus shells, a claim backed up by a report of the New York-based Human Rights Watch. And two Norwegian doctors, recently returned from working in the Gaza Strip, accused Israel of using the territory as a testing ground for a new 'extremely nasty' type of explosive."

Then there is today's report. also by The Times of London, from correspondent Sheera Franklin in Jerusalem:

"Remnants of an Israeli white phosphorus shell, identified by the marking on the outer casing -- M825A1 -- have been found in the village of Sheikh Ajilin in western Gaza. Witnesses in Gaza said that the shell was fired on January 9 and was taken indoors as evidence. They recalled seeing thick smoke and smelling a strong odour in keeping with the garlic-like smell associated with white phosphorus.

"Hebrew writing on the shell casing reads 'exploding smoke' -- the term the Israeli army uses for white phosphorus. Doctors who examined the shell said that it appeared to include phosphorus residue. Residents said that they suffered burns on their feet when they walked where the shelling had taken place."