The Church is responsible for over population in the Phils.

[tolstoi]

---

unya ngano'ng way condom, pills and ug uban pa nga available sa katawhan hilabi na sa mga pobre?
Coz d church said no.. duh!

the church is just voicing out what is of moral and ethical means of human sexuality that is within the context of Christianity. There are other means of preventing unnecessary pregnancy in the poor sector of our society that does not need the use of artificial contraceptives and one of that is rhythm method and the other is the VERY efficient ABSTINENCE!..well u should be glad of yourself that there is a concerned sector in our society that instills morality in the middle of this troubled world and that is the CHURCH and remember that the church have no regulating power on the people so basically they are just there to lecture and promote moral values. You cant blame the CHRUCH by saying that they deprive the masses of having access to those condoms, pills..etc. Every one can purchase this stuff easily in OTC drug stores and it is up to the peoples sentido cumon if they will instill on there corrupted minds the teaching of the CHURCH..getss...

[off^tangent]

daghan baya kaayo ug hinungdan ngano overpopulated ang pilipinas, usa ani mao ang
pagka-palautog sa mga pinoy! known kaayo na sa gawaas. di nato idak-dak ang tanan
basul sa church, although naa pud uban nila palautog.


this is just my "humble opinion". opinion na, humble pa jud, so ayaw ingna nga sayop ko, ha.

peace, men !!!

[tolstoi]

^^toooiiinnkkk...unsaon man sad bai makapa-utog man ang mga sinul-uban sa mga babaye kron..lolz

[off^tangent]

just as it takes two to dance ug 'sweet'! :P

[Bada ! Bing]

OT:

OT: I'm sorry "IF" ever, my words really go into your nerves.. i don't mind though if ever you resort to hitting low blows. I hope this time you'll agree with my contention. now let's got back to the topic. I do know what i'm saying, moreover i'm not trying to let others swallow my perspective (kindly look on the key words "in my humble opinion") .. i'm aware of the fact that this is a free country and we have all the means to stress our insights on a particular issue.

don't believe everything you think...no you're not getting into my nerves, not at all and no apologies needed. if you scroll back you will see i am playing with your posts...i did not attack you - the poster - but your posts...there's a difference. low blows? you're taking it wrong. you are full of yourself and has low opinion on others (i'm just trying to keep you in line)...take a look:

hahay.. magbinisaya nalang sad ko ha...

DILI MAN NATO MALIMOD NA ANG SIMBAHAN ADUNA GUY'Y SHARE SA PROBLEMA SA OVERPOPULATION...

you can post in bisaya...pina-"hahay" pa jud ka...mora man sad kag di bisayang dako. this was your 2nd post...there was no rebuttal from me on your first "humble opinion", remember? unya you posted again, in bisaya this time para makasabot ming tanan...and which, if you remember, i agreed with you on this...and then you keep posting + explaining yourself...daghan pa gihapon kaayo kag estorya...

.. as much as i don't wanna teach you english grammar which i think you don't need to..

kasabot intawon kos thread oi...don't assume and throw insulting and "uncalled for" remarks...and then come back and accuse me of throwing low blows...not very kewl...

FOR THE THIRD TIME, THIS IS NOT A QUESTION IF THE CHURCH HAS SOMETHING TO DO WITH THE PROBLEM...BUT RATHER A QUESTION AS TO THE NEED TO TAKE THIS BEYOND DIPLOMATIC MEANS

ALL CAPS in discussion board and chatrooms are considered shouting/yelling. is somebody getting into your nerves? unya bold pa jud...is that with megaphone or nangugat na ka?

Now.. my first post was basically my answer to the problem on overpopulation , not being unilateral in nature, but rather multilateral, since it basically sprouted out from other problems or perhaps the other way around...

we know that, naa bay ni argue sa imo first post?

... i don't know why my first post though answers my recent question as to the need to take this beyond diplomatic means? please enlighten me..

exactly, it doesnt...that's why i don't understand ngano daghan kaayo kag estorya...yada yada yada...


my opinion is clear from the start...i have respected yours...it's appropriate you respect mine...

one lesson i learned in life...roll with the punches and don't take things personally. (i know it's cliche but sure works for me)

[gareb]

Apo ni Barabas:

the definition u gave was comprehensive enough. unfortunately you only saw overpopulation simply as 'population volume' taking it away from its economic context.

funny thing is, i have not read any 'textbooks' on the issue of population and i did not exactly get those from 'textbooks'... maybe i should write one. hehe. :mrgreen:

know it's not the ONLY cause but sure is a BIG hindrance for the government to move forward...

if you mean overpopulation, yes. and it will remain so as long as the government does not change the conditions that make overpopulation possible.

[giver_bert]

OT: (my last modz.. sorry) Bada bing

errr.. you sure it's the post only that you are attacking (it seems like the word "hahay" rings the bell...)

and what seems to be the insulting part of my posts please i urge you to quote it.. maybe i ow you an apology then..

take a look at the word that i just emphasize in my last post... "IF".. i'm using it basically cause i don't really know if my post really got into your nerves.. i believe in your last post (telling me it didn't)..and thank you, now i can breath...

i'm sorry.. but i'm not much into chatrooms, nor do i know technicalities on it.... and believe me.. the all caps in my posts are just meant to emphasize a part of my post that i'd like other posters to focus .. thanks for the info though.. (now i'm just using bold characters instead so as to avoid misinterpretations..

you see bada bing.. the reason why i posted further explanation with my second post (sorry i forgot it was my second when i made my last post) because with the way i understood your post, you basically agree on the thought that the church has some contributions with the problem on overpopulation "only".. which gave me an impression then that you were one of those who is in favor of blaming the church more likely on the tackled problem (if my interpretations were wrong then.. i apologize)

believe it or not.. i respect other's post.. and i hope you do also.. let's not put words on somebody else's mouth ok, cause somehow it's tantamount to disrespect...

*i'll leave this issue though on other forumers.. *

peace

[Bada ! Bing]

OT:

more yada yada yada...getting old and boring...

wa pa jed cya mahuman explaining himself...on ur requests please read my previous posts...kapoy cge balik2x...parang sirang plaka...

*i'll leave this issue though on other forumers.. *

do i smell palaban...ka cute...


like i said...i agree to this...

DILI MAN NATO MALIMOD NA ANG SIMBAHAN ADUNA GUY'Y SHARE SA PROBLEMA SA OVERPOPULATION...

... indeed there is no question as to the church's contribution on the problem, since it's part of the cultural factor...

sorry but the rest of your whining i don't...i agree to disagree...will you respect that...or do u still wanna continue forcing ur opinion on me...



peace pards!

[crinkle]

*whew* grabeha na ani na thread oi... so intense... mura man debate ni Bush ug ni Kerry.

[DutcheD]

It's IGNORANCE and LACK of EDUCATION.