The common things about both sites you are pointing out are the obvious character attacks to Gage. Why are these people attacking his character? It is in an effort to discredit him. (I think that's a form of compliment, in itself)

Hadlok sila ni Gage so they try another route to attack him. (That's just my observation, though)
Again, the only thing Gage and his associates want is to re-open the investigation. Don't you think we can all benefit from that? How can they not possibly grant that? If they want to silence the nay-sayers then re-open the investigation and let the public scrutinize the Commission's findings.
Easy right? In your mind, unsa may nakalisod if ilang i-grant na confident man kaha ni sila sa ilang findings??
Anyway, let me just say for the record that I have no stake in this thing. Nangugat na man lang gyud mo diri and the arguments are just spinning around. I came in here to read the posts in the hope that either side would present strong evidences to support their arguments. Makawala lang ug gana kung magbinaylu-ay na ug insulto.
I will post articles as I come across them in relation to what you guys are discussing at the moment just so I can help you guys find "closure". What is futile man sad gud is that all our sources are internet. As agent said, newspaper/magazine clippings would be good --- unsa kaha kanindut magtapok ta ilang Agent nya magda tag isa ka box an Tanduay ng tukion nato ng iyang mga clippings?? Hmmm...
Personally, as I said in the previous thread, buildings do not crumble the way WTC did. Mao ra gyud na akoa. Mura man ug puro ra semento ang building adtong kalakiha -- murag way mga kabilya ug steel beams gibutang, ditso man lang ka-pulbos. Ug natunga lang siguro to nya natumba ang katunga OK siguro. Katuohan pa. Para ra ni nako ha...
I think that as we tackle this subject, we should also put into consideration that America is full of conspiracies simply because it is a powerful country, and there are powerful people in there who either think they are above the law, or they think that what they are doing is for the good of the people and "
it's best daw that the constituents need not know about the whole truth".
Does that sound familiar? How about
plausible deniability? There is a very small ring of powerful people within that country's government who have the power to order their top surgical teams to run ops only a very few people will ever know about. This power was exercised in the recent bin Laden raid, and they admitted to that. So, this is a confirmation that that sort of method exists...
So what's stopping them from running an op like 9/11? But you might say "Ha? They will run a secret op to kill thousands of their own people just to start a war??" Well, their military (super-secret unit, Delta Force) did run an op against American citizens and killed them (Waco, Texas).
So there, maybe some of you can't imagine why they would do that, but then again, power and greed are such good motivators.
And unless someone from that "inner circle" will crack and come out, and testify, point the fingers, and present indisputable proofs, until then we can only speculate.