RELIGION....(part 2)

[makusama]

---

For some unknown reason CardinalBunal HATES the Catholic Church.

No matter how you disprove his reasons he will look for more without ever acknowledging the asnwered questions he previously threw at us. Sige lang Change Topic bah... then after awhile CardinalBunal throws the same "ANSWERED" questions again (thinking basin nakalimtan na nato)...

this has mutated into a cyber boxing match so to say... this is no longer a debate because there is no solid point to prove or disprove... the topic is ever changing and no matter how much proof to back up the Roman Catholic Church, if a man was taught since birth (or for a tremendous amount of time) to hate it he will always hate it and find even a madmans word proof enough for him...

Koo Klucks Clan Mentality... hate it because it is different... hate it because I do not understand it... Hate it because I do not want to understand it...

[makusama]

Anger is normal... Even God got angry a lot of times in the Bible... Moses got angry... Christ got angry... but "HATE" is the haven of the devil

[Cardinal Bunal]

Paul writes in Romans 12: 9..... Hate what is evil. Cling to what is good.

---------

As for the dates that were very late from let's say the first few decades of Christianity I wasn't talking about the Canon. I was referring to how clever the lies are weaved by the defenders of the pharisaical Roman clergy dating the documents you posted much much later in the era before Christianity reached it's hundredth year.

Evidence? There have been many already posted here by Christians who are keen against the errors of the gospel according to Rome. Even the use of deductive investigation will expose the idolatrous ways and the incoherent unsound teaching of salvation of the Roman Catholic Church. Yet the theologians and zealous defenders whose loyalties have been misplaced will dismiss these with the reader response critique. which isn't exactly a valid form of argumentation either.

I love Roman Catholics. But I hate the institution that dupes them. God is even more hateful for it too, as he abhors all evil. Yet he does not delight in the death of sinners if you read Ezekiel 18. That's why He sent His Son as the expiation for sins.1 to perform a sacrifice that is effective forever. 2

Many of these saving truths are written by the apostles, and many of what was written also had to be read (1 Thes. 5: 27, Col. 4: 16) in unmistakably clear language. Why reject it? Are you not in error because you do not know the Scriptures or the power of God? Or the efficacy of Jesus Christ for that matter?

___________

1. 1 John 4: 10 - 11 (NAB)
2. Hebrews 10: 12 - 14, see also verse 18. (TEV)

[makusama]

No matter how you disprove his reasons he will look for more without ever acknowledging the asnwered questions he previously threw at us. Sige lang Change Topic bah... then after awhile CardinalBunal throws the same "ANSWERED" questions again (thinking basin nakalimtan na nato)...

this has mutated into a cyber boxing match so to say... this is no longer a debate because there is no solid point to prove or disprove... the topic is ever changing and no matter how much proof to back up the Roman Catholic Church, if a man was taught since birth (or for a tremendous amount of time) to hate it he will always hate it and find even a madmans word proof enough for him...

[MrBiddle]

REVISIONIST CATHOLICISM

Catholics of the Baby Boom generation have a lot of potential to truly carry out the Christian values being taught in the Gospel.

But new and contemporary Catholics may have a lean towards a laxity in the faith, and as one as defined lukewarmness is the devil in disguise...... There are other Catholics who might as well be called outright unbelievers because their life has been in shambles because of their sins , and the only thing that makes them able to identify being of the religious group of the faith of billions is that they make the sign of the cross whenever they ride jeepneys, and other external rituals that they think might save them.

Other contemporary Catholics have BETTER potential to know the Gospel and live it out as many baby boomers do, people who are "basically good" from a worldly perspective and who have convictions of what might be sacred, and what might be ... sacrilegious in what they profess. But that doesn't necessary indicate the absence of being lukewarm either.

[Sovabon]

Anger is normal... Even God got angry a lot of times in the Bible... Moses got angry... Christ got angry... but "HATE" is the haven of the devil

But wala sila mamalikas! Not like you here. Practice what you preach bro.

[makusama]

unsa may balikas ako gisulti bro.. kindly quote me...

[Empress_Of_Drac]

Hmmn...religions...devils...angels...etc...etc...a ll this friggin' stuff are worthless...worthless...all that matter are the stuff you do to your fellows...hmmn...i prefer not to blab my anticipations and frustrations here about the stuff you're debating...one thing I want to say is...there's no such thing as heaven or hell...all are just from the friggin' imaginatons of ancient scholar mortals to justify their faiths and beliefs...err...that's my friggin' opinion...so spare me with your arguments...err

[off^tangent]

It's interesting to watch here Agent Smiths and Neos slugging it out for supremacy, both sides are capable of sustaining this supermatch. But if you grow tired of it, you can always take the red pill and unplug yourself from the Matrix. Zion is beckoning...

On second thought, life inside the Matrix is more comfortable.

[Gwynhuever]

@off^tangent.....mmhwa...good one! :mrgreen: