Questions for the Atheists

[yanong_banikanhon]

---

Is that all you can think of? A justifiable proof of any statement?

Mao na'y ipangutana sa imong kaugalingon, bay. Kay mao baya na'y basis nganong inyong gi-deny ang existence sa transcendental SOURCE. Kay matud ninyo, walay natural justifiable proof kanang maong pagtoo.

Unya hain man lagi ang natural justifiable proof sa foundation sa inyong pagsupak-supak? Hain man ang natural justifiable proof that logic is the only way to prove the truth or falsity of any thing?

Kay kun dili mo makapakita anang maong proof, klaro kaayo nga maski kamo, dili sure sa inyong pagtoo. What you have is nothing but blind faith. Unya double standard pa gyud mo, maayo lang mo mangayo og proof/evidence sa mga theists unya kun kamo'y pangayoan sa proof sa inyong pagtoo, moingon lang mo'g 'ambot'.

P.S. Out sa ko, ha. Balik lang ko unyang taud2x.

[iheartnikon]

Aw, ipakita lagi ang justifiable evidence nga tinuod ning inyong claim:

Logic is THE ONLY way to prove the truth or falsity of any thing?

Para dili mi makaingon nga pulos lang mo assumption, pulos lang wishful thinking. Hain man ang evidence nga tinuod kanang statement sa taas?

P.S. Break sa ko ha. Take your time. I-research ang inyong mga literatures basin naa pa diay mo'y makitang evidence nga magpamatuod aning inyong claim: Logic is THE ONLY way to prove the truth or falsity of any thing.

Who said LOGIC IS THE ONLY WAY? How about the evidence and the facts?

You are the one who is asserting that Logic is the ONLY WAY... lol...

That's why as I've said ganina "I DON'T KNOW HOW EVERY SINGLE THING STARTED"....

Swerte ka 2am ra ko kutob sa opisina...

[iheartnikon]

Mao na'y ipangutana sa imong kaugalingon, bay. Kay mao baya na'y basis nganong inyong gi-deny ang existence sa transcendental SOURCE. Kay matud ninyo, walay natural justifiable proof kanang maong pagtoo.

Unya hain man lagi ang natural justifiable proof sa foundation sa inyong pagsupak-supak? Hain man ang natural justifiable proof that logic is the only way to prove the truth or falsity of any thing?

Kay kun dili mo makapakita anang maong proof, klaro kaayo nga maski kamo, dili sure sa inyong pagtoo. What you have is nothing but blind faith. Unya double standard pa gyud mo, maayo lang mo mangayo og proof/evidence sa mga theists unya kun kamo'y pangayoan sa proof sa inyong pagtoo, moingon lang mo'g 'ambot'.

P.S. Out sa ko, ha. Balik lang ko unyang taud2x.

Kahibaw ka bay nganung supak mi ana? Wala pako kita ug SUPERNATURAL... ug WALA PA GYUY EBIDENSYA NGA NI EXIST NA.... And I know it never existed (in my opinion)... gets?

So ang imo diayng stand is naa gyuy ginoo kay ang supernatural dli ma explain? lol...

By the way, may ask you something? Motoo ka nga naay ginoo?

Unya sige kag hisgot anang supernatural nga murag kahibaw pud ka unsa nang klaseha... lol..

[KlaytoN]

Is that an assumption? If not, can you provide a natural, justifiable proof that the statement above is true?

It's all around you.. It's all proven time and time again or you can ask any scientist.. How about you? ayaw na pag pinilosopo dinha bai.. bais bais man ka.. hehe.. What are you trying to prove?

[KlaytoN]

Mao na'y ipangutana sa imong kaugalingon, bay. Kay mao baya na'y basis nganong inyong gi-deny ang existence sa transcendental SOURCE. Kay matud ninyo, walay natural justifiable proof kanang maong pagtoo.

Unya hain man lagi ang natural justifiable proof sa foundation sa inyong pagsupak-supak? Hain man ang natural justifiable proof that logic is the only way to prove the truth or falsity of any thing?

Kay kun dili mo makapakita anang maong proof, klaro kaayo nga maski kamo, dili sure sa inyong pagtoo. What you have is nothing but blind faith. Unya double standard pa gyud mo, maayo lang mo mangayo og proof/evidence sa mga theists unya kun kamo'y pangayoan sa proof sa inyong pagtoo, moingon lang mo'g 'ambot'.

P.S. Out sa ko, ha. Balik lang ko unyang taud2x.

in short gi testingan lang nimo ang mga atheists if they know what they are talking about.. hehe..

[yanong_banikanhon]

It's all around you.. It's all proven time and time again or you can ask any scientist.. How about you? ayaw na pag pinilosopo dinha bai...

Hehehe...wala gyud na'y kalainan namong mga theists bay kun moingon pud mi nga: God's evidence is all around you...you can ask any priest/minister/pastor...

Kun ing-ana man lang diay ang sangputan sa atong diskusyon diri, dugay na unta mong nihilom. Pero natural man gyud na mangita ta og proof sa usa ka claim before ta motuo. Naghatag na ko og proof sa existence sa usa ka transcendental SOURCE, hangtud karon, wala pa na ninyo ma-refute.

Unya kay lagi ang topic bahin man sa mga pangutana para sa mga ateyista, taronga pud tawon og tubag ang mga questions nga ipasupot diri. Tabangi og tubag si iheartnikon sa akong pangutana sa ubos

Who said LOGIC IS THE ONLY WAY? How about the evidence and the facts?

You are the one who is asserting that Logic is the ONLY WAY... lol...

So ang imong assertion is: Logic, evidence and facts are the ONLY WAY to prove the truth or falsity of any thing. Unsa man pud proof nimo nga tinuod nang imong assertion? Kun dili ka makapakita og proof ana, the only logical conclusion is: imo ra nang tinumo-tumo kanang maong assertion. Ipakita ang proof nga tinuod ning imong assertion bay:

Logic, evidence and facts are the ONLY WAY to prove the truth or falsity of any thing.

[treize]

Nalubong mani sa kalimot akong laing pangutana, nanglihay man.. tsk! tsk! tsk!..

I already did bro, have you? I'm still refuting macro-evolution, I've already posted some factors that denies macro evolution using DNA, but it seems it's still not enough for you guys so I posted again another factors by Mutation.

If evolution(one specie evolving to another specie) is possible then mutation will have to make it happen. But as you see there are lots of problems even in mutation.


Let's get back to the topic. Questions for the atheist even if none has countered those questions but let me ask another.

Why are some evolutionists became creationists?

Another thing, the most famous atheist today is Richard Dawkins an ethologist(one who studies animal behavior), but before him the most famous atheist was Dr. Antony Flew. But why did this hardcore atheist renounced himself in atheism and accepted deism? He wrote a book last 2007 entitled a There Is A God: How the World’s Most Notorious Atheist Changed His Mind.

Flew went on to blast Richard Dawkins’ and his book The God Delusion for Dawkins’ “comical effort” to argue that the origin of life can be attributed to a “Lucky Chance”. Flew went on to say about Dawkins, “If that’s the best argument you have, then the game is over.

Antony Flew - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[treize]

It's all around you.. It's all proven time and time again or you can ask any scientist.. How about you? ayaw na pag pinilosopo dinha bai.. bais bais man ka.. hehe.. What are you trying to prove?

Asa man imong proof bro? Kinsa nga scientists? Ayaw pag-ingon ana nga any scientist cause that's totally BS. So aside from logic and reason unsa pa man diay laing nimong way to prove the truth?

[iheartnikon]

Hehehe...wala gyud na'y kalainan namong mga theists bay kun moingon pud mi nga: God's evidence is all around you...you can ask any priest/minister/pastor...

God's evidence is all around you? How can this be a justified evidence?

Kun ing-ana man lang diay ang sangputan sa atong diskusyon diri, dugay na unta mong nihilom. Pero natural man gyud na mangita ta og proof sa usa ka claim before ta motuo. Naghatag na ko og proof sa existence sa usa ka transcendental SOURCE, hangtud karon, wala pa na ninyo ma-refute.

Unsa may proof? Sorry, pero wa ko kita ana nga proof...

Unya kay lagi ang topic bahin man sa mga pangutana para sa mga ateyista, taronga pud tawon og tubag ang mga questions nga ipasupot diri. Tabangi og tubag si iheartnikon sa akong pangutana sa ubos

So ang imong assertion is: Logic, evidence and facts are the ONLY WAY to prove the truth or falsity of any thing. Unsa man pud proof nimo nga tinuod nang imong assertion? Kun dili ka makapakita og proof ana, the only logical conclusion is: imo ra nang tinumo-tumo kanang maong assertion. Ipakita ang proof nga tinuod ning imong assertion bay:

Logic, evidence and facts are the ONLY WAY to prove the truth or falsity of any thing.

Yes Logic, Evidence together with facts are ways to prove or quantifying what is true or false...

Like for example, mo ana ko nimo naa ko ga puyo sa mars karon... Unsaon man diay nimo pag tubag nga sipyat ko?

Unsay man diay klase nga proof imong i-refute nako?

So theist ka, gi unsa man diay nimo pagkahibaw nga naa gyud creator?

[iheartnikon]

Nalubong mani sa kalimot akong laing pangutana, nanglihay man.. tsk! tsk! tsk!..

Antony Flew died of dementia. And in fact suffering from this mental disease for years... He isn't credible...

But even if he changed his mind, it doesn't mean that this is an evidence to support any gods...