The Roman Catholic Church~ Questions

[slabdans]

---

Hahaha, you understood it wrong,, i meant nga maybe there's no Jesus, and everything you know about him is fiction...

ok ranang maybe...maybe there is pud, fiction? aw kung fiction siya amaw to pilato kay nagpa crucify ug fiction character

[noy]

alright! alright...let's move on with the next question shall we? hehehe

[Jhared]

ok ranang maybe...maybe there is pud, fiction? aw kung fiction siya amaw to pilato kay nagpa crucify ug fiction character

yes maybe.. maybe naa pud..

dili uy, di man si pilato ang nag crucify ni Jesus ang mga taw man, naa gani na sa inyong Apostles Creed sigehan ninyo ug recite, "He suffered under Pontios Pilate", under meaning under the rule, but not necessarily because of him, kahinumdum ka nanghinaw siya?.. he died for your sins remember?...

[Dorothea]

Do you guys tithe? Or do you just donate what you can? What's the official Catholic teaching on tithing?

[slabdans]

yes maybe.. maybe naa pud..

dili uy, di man si pilato ang nag crucify ni Jesus ang mga taw man, naa gani na sa inyong Apostles Creed sigehan ninyo ug recite, "He suffered under Pontios Pilate", under meaning under the rule, but not necessarily because of him, kahinumdum ka nanghinaw siya?.. he died for your sins remember?...

ingon ba di ie kong siya, nagpa -meaning nagsugo dili siya ang nag lansang.

nanghinaw, so dili siya? pastilan ngano nanghinaw man siya?

[Jhared]

ingon ba di ie kong siya, nagpa -meaning nagsugo dili siya ang nag lansang.

nanghinaw, so dili siya? pastilan ngano nanghinaw man siya?

wrong gihapon, dili siya ang gasugo, it was the people who brought him to the authorities, remember nangutana siya sa mga taw kong unsay sala ni jesus but the people kept on saying nga "crucify him"? and then pontios washed his hands and said " “I am innocent of the blood of this just Person(jesus).” and then niana ang mga taw "“His blood be on us and on our children.”..

as it is a rule nga every leader have a final say whenever punishment be vested upon persons, pontios was just acting on a duty to act on the collective will of his constituents.. in short bay slabdans, dili siya ang gasugo but ang mga taw.. get the point?

[slabdans]

wrong gihapon, dili siya ang gasugo, it was the people who brought him to the authorities, remember nangutana siya sa mga taw kong unsay sala ni jesus but the people kept on saying nga "crucify him"? and then pontios washed his hands and said " “I am innocent of the blood of this just Person(jesus).” and then niana ang mga taw "“His blood be on us and on our children.”..

as it is a rule nga every leader have a final say whenever punishment be vested upon persons, pontios was just acting on a duty to act on the collective will of his constituents.. in short bay slabdans, dili siya ang gasugo but ang mga taw.. get the point?

aw nasamot na noon...ang mga tawo gusto nga ipalansang nila ang ang fiction character hehehe

[R.Forster]

wrong gihapon, dili siya ang gasugo, it was the people who brought him to the authorities, remember nangutana siya sa mga taw kong unsay sala ni jesus but the people kept on saying nga "crucify him"? and then pontios washed his hands and said " “I am innocent of the blood of this just Person(jesus).” and then niana ang mga taw "“His blood be on us and on our children.”..

as it is a rule nga every leader have a final say whenever punishment be vested upon persons, pontios was just acting on a duty to act on the collective will of his constituents.. in short bay slabdans, dili siya ang gasugo but ang mga taw.. get the point?

Pag binisaya lang dili na kasabot ug english.

[newbie.86]

Again, Dili ta mu assume na naa jud "Jesus Christ" na gi crucify, kay walay written documents from the romans na naay gi crucify na "Jesus Christ"

NONSENSE.

Mga ROMANO ra diay ang makasuwat niadtong panahuna? hahahaha.
Nalibang tingali ka katong ni-discuss inyong mga maestra nga ang mga Judio makasuwat pud diay.

Jesus Christ as a name did not exist in his time, he was known as Jesus of Nazareth to the Romans. Tan-awa kuno ang inscription nga INRI sa krus He was treated as an ordinary criminal and the roman emperor did not pay attention to his case. If he could have met Tiberius, maybe naa cya free publicity. His Jewish contemporaries wrote about him.

Take note, FACTS are not only transmitted through writing, they can be transmitted via ORAL TESTIMONIES. The existence and resurrection of Christ was witnessed by at least 500 people.

Take another analogy.

Socrates did not write anything. His students, not the Athenian government wrote about him and his teachings.
Jesus did not write anything. His apostles and followers, not the Roman government wrote about him and his teachings.

Can we dispute that Socrates did not exist at all and regard him as another fairy tale creature by the Greeks?

[newbie.86]

attack of the clones jud ang drama sa uban diri. hala, cge paningkamot jud maayo himog clones para managhan ta diri.