Questions for the Atheists

[iheartnikon]

---

Aguy, wala gyud nimo ma-realize asa ang sayop aning maong proposition?

I hope that science will explain everything THEREFORE....science will explain everything.

Kun naay moingon sa imo: I hope you will die today...THEREFORE you will die today, motuo ka?

P.S. @iheartnikon, na-offline man lagi ka'g kalit, bay? nagdaut-daut imong internet connection?

I went into a work break...

Kinsa may ga ingon ug "I HOPE"?

[iheartnikon]

Hehehe...morag nagsugod na pud og bahag ang mga ikog Sa dili pa mo modagan, tubaga sa ni palihug mga bangiitang ateyista:

Can you provide a justifiable natural proof that everything has a natural explanation?

No there isn't. Is that a proof that there is indeed a supernatural source?

[yanong_banikanhon]

No there isn't. Is that a proof that there is indeed a supernatural source?

No, it is not. But it is a proof that the basis of your belief is nothing but blind faith.

Therefore aning imong giingon nga:

I don't claim on things we cannot understand. I know science will have a long way to answer the ultimate question... But I know science will...

is nothing but a wishful thinking.

Regarding anang akong gihisgutang transcendental SOURCE, back-thread lang kay ako na ng gihisgutan sa mga previous posts.

Next question:

Can you provide a natural, justifiable proof that logic is THE ONLY way to prove the truth or falsity of any claim?

[KlaytoN]

Hehehe...morag nagsugod na pud og bahag ang mga ikog Sa dili pa mo modagan, tubaga sa ni palihug mga bangiitang ateyista:

Can you provide a justifiable natural proof that everything has a natural explanation?

Hay naku! The closest you can have is the Scientific Method. Give a scientist enough data and science will explain any phenomena..

[KlaytoN]

Scientific Method

Science can't prove the scientific method itself. It presumes it. How can something use it's own process to prove it's own process? It can't. To even try is circular reasoning.

Are you out of this world?? Care to explain further?? Scientific Method is based on hypothetico-deductive logic in which we "assume the truth of the very thing being questioned" in order to construct if-then predictions (i.e., we say "IF this theory is true, THEN when we do ___ we will see ___") so we can use reality checks (by comparing the predictions of a theory with observations of reality) to test our theory, to help us determine whether "the way we think the world is" matches "the way the world really is." Do you see the important difference — despite a superficial similarity — between scientific logic and circular logic?

[iheartnikon]

No, it is not. But it is a proof that the basis for your belief is nothing but blind faith.

Regarding anang akong gihisgutang transcendental SOURCE, back-thread lang kay ako na ng gihisgutan sa mga previous posts.

Next question:

Can you provide a natural, justifiable proof that logic is THE ONLY way to prove the truth or falsity of any claim?

Lol.... EVIDENCE my friend, EVIDENCE.... The overwhelming EVIDENCE.... What can you get from religion? Is there any single evidence to justify it's existence? it's You, and not me is living on blind faith...

[yanong_banikanhon]

Give a scientist enough data and science will explain any phenomena..

Is that an assumption? If not, can you provide a natural, justifiable proof that the statement above is true?

[iheartnikon]

No, it is not. But it is a proof that the basis of your belief is nothing but blind faith.

Therefore aning imong giingon nga:



is nothing but a wishful thinking.

Regarding anang akong gihisgutang transcendental SOURCE, back-thread lang kay ako na ng gihisgutan sa mga previous posts.

Next question:

Can you provide a natural, justifiable proof that logic is THE ONLY way to prove the truth or falsity of any claim?

No, it is not. But it is a proof that the basis for your belief is nothing but blind faith.

Regarding anang akong gihisgutang transcendental SOURCE, back-thread lang kay ako na ng gihisgutan sa mga previous posts.

Next question:

Can you provide a natural, justifiable proof that logic is THE ONLY way to prove the truth or falsity of any claim?

Lol.... EVIDENCE my friend, EVIDENCE.... The overwhelming EVIDENCE.... What can you get from religion? Is there any single evidence to justify it's existence? it's You, and not me is living on blind faith...

[iheartnikon]

Is that an assumption? If not, can you provide a natural, justifiable proof that the statement above is true?

Is that all you can think of? A justifiable proof of any statement?

[yanong_banikanhon]

Lol.... EVIDENCE my friend, EVIDENCE.... The overwhelming EVIDENCE....

Aw, ipakita lagi ang justifiable evidence nga tinuod ning inyong claim:

Logic is THE ONLY way to prove the truth or falsity of any thing

Para dili mi makaingon nga pulos lang mo assumption, pulos lang wishful thinking. Hain man ang evidence nga tinuod kanang statement sa taas?

P.S. Break sa ko ha. Take your time. I-research ang inyong mga literatures basin naa pa diay mo'y makitang evidence nga magpamatuod aning inyong claim: Logic is THE ONLY way to prove the truth or falsity of any thing.