
Originally Posted by
giddyboy
Wait a minute...I don't think the thread title gives justice to the article. what is another bakak supposedly?
the 2 Billion surplus?
I don't think it was a lie. It is just perhaps Greg Sanchez doesn't know accounting.
A surplus cannot remain a surplus forever or for a long time coz it has to be used. and there's also a big difference between "surplus" and "available funds".
I even want to think this issue is already closed.
But it seems some posters have the tendency to make mountains out of molehills. hahaha
Unsaon it's election fever naman gud...