
Originally Posted by
The_Child
so why make a fuss about the style of my point, its not the style that is the point, but the point itself.
Why Eco, as ive said, Eco is an expert on that field, whereas Brown is not, it lends more credibility to listen to eco rather than brown on the contention.
i know why your so irritated with my post, because you assume that you are not the average joe, but the rather pompous wandering idiot attempting to dress as an intellectual?
im sorry sir to hurt your feelings if that is the case.
so if you dont have anything against my claim why do you criticize it, just because i called the opposite as a pompous wandering idiot attempting to dress as an intellectual? because i think thats what they really are, they could hvae their opinions with the risk of either saying something that they really dont have any knowledgeable depth on or that they actually know what theyre saying, the former makes them in its essence pompous wandering idiots attempting to dress as an intellectual because if they dont know what theyre saying then i means theyre pompous saying something what they dont know about, the latter is another story.
so you feel therefore that i am categorizing you in that level sir? im sorry. but i am not, im just stating a general statement. its up to you were to place yourself according to classification. my general claim is really logical, and its not insulting, for how else are you suppose to describe somebody who talks about something that he doesnt know about but pompous or assuming or whatelse is there? so my choice was what it was.
again the_child its not your opin9ion, but your style, i dont have much of a problem as to what category i belong, in fact at a times i make a fool out of myself,& my opinion of your style is my opinion,
i just have difficulty fitting your style w/ what you claim as your just being sincere,
i dont know maybe when i reach home i have to find the real meaning of sincirty,
bye for now thge_child & thank you for your faith