^ Really?
If the Hindus were not polytheistic, then they wouldn't recognize their other gods, only Brahman. But the fact is, they do recognize these deities. They don't act as if they don't exist.
^ Really?
If the Hindus were not polytheistic, then they wouldn't recognize their other gods, only Brahman. But the fact is, they do recognize these deities. They don't act as if they don't exist.
^ But do they recognize these "manifestations" as gods or not?![]()
If they consider them as merely "manifestations," maybe we can consider Hinduism as monotheistic.
But the fact is, they do consider them as gods (theos), therefore Hinduism is poly-theistic.
The point here really is that the major religions of the world have mutually exclusive truth claims.
Yes but not literally. Read the Bhagavad Gita!
After all, it is a favorite Hindu saying that "The Truth is One, but different sages call it by different names." But when Hindus do define their religion in these terms, usually for the benefit of curious westerners, they tend to do so in terms of monotheism and pantheism.![]()
Last edited by regnauld; 06-02-2009 at 02:30 AM.
However, abstinence from action is regarded as being just as detrimental as extreme indulgence. According to the Bhagavad Gita, the goal of life is to free the mind and intellect from their complexities and to focus them on the glory of the Self by dedicating one's actions to the divine. This goal can be achieved through the Yogas of meditation, action, devotion and knowledge. In the sixth chapter, Krishna describes the best Yogi as one who constantly meditates upon him - which is understood to mean thinking of either Krishna personally, or the supreme Brahman
http://bhagavadgitaasitis.com/6/47/en1![]()
Similar Threads |
|