Suppose to be ug e Apply ....Originally Posted by necrotic freak
Suppose to be ug e Apply ....Originally Posted by necrotic freak
Kanang copied karon existing parihas rana sila ug content sa Oriniginal Manuscript ... ang problema diha sa Bible wala nagkasinabot ang RC ug non Catholic kay ang Apocrypha the rest parihas ra.Originally Posted by bcasabee
Wala ko kasabot nimo bro....ingon ka nawagtang ang original......nganong nakaingon man ka nga pareha ra ang original manuscript ug karon existing....Giunsa nimo pagcompare nga wala man kay ika compare?
So nganong mo basa man ka anang imong Bible nga wala man diay nay klaro diin gikan kay ang original nawagtang. Murag de ja vu mani...Sa akoang nahinumduman, si amico ang sige ug balik balik ug pangutana ani.
Originally Posted by amingb
The grass withers, the flower fades, but the word of our God stands forever." (Isaiah 40:Originally Posted by bcasabee
.
mao na naka nindot sa Ginoo bro bisan copied rana sa Original Manuscript mao ra gihapon na siya ug Original. Faith lang jud na atoa diha bro. Let History tell itself.
Ang Catholic Bible maoy wa nagka sinabot kay ang Apocryphal Books lain2x ug printed wala nagka parihas. Ang uban mo uyo ang uban dili.
Giunsa lagi pagkahibawo nimo nga ang apocryphal books, wala sa original Bible kay ang original Bible, nawagtang.
Originally Posted by amingb
After na compile ang Bible walay apocryphal books kana gi Insert rana sa Roman Catholics .Originally Posted by bcasabee
^^^^ Gi unsa lagi nimo pagkabalo, nga ang original nawagtang man, unya wala kay ma komparahan.....Unya asa man ron ang listahan sa libro sa original Bible?
The scribes who made these copies were extremely careful as they did their work. We know this because there are over 5000 complete or partial copies of the originals, actually copies of the copies. Yet these thousands of copies (which predate the printing press) agree with each other to an amazing extent. There is no major variation in any of them. No other book from ancient times has this much underlying documentary support. So we are sure we have the original text as it came from the mind of God.Originally Posted by bcasabee
ang first bible translation(Latin Vulgate) ni St. Jerome wala nya gi apil ang apocryphal books but later when St, Augustine tell him to include the apocyphal books and After conferring with Pope Damasus, St. Jerome included the Deuterocanonical books in his translation as the first official bible translation of the catholic church...Originally Posted by amingb
The word apocrypha is derived from the Greek abscondita, which historically identified writings which had an obscure origin or which were heretical. In the Talmud the Jewish rabbis used this word to describe works which were not canonical Scripture.Originally Posted by necrotic freak
Similar Threads |
|