
Originally Posted by
gareb
true. an idea becomes a recourse for people who has lost faith in the current system because of the innumerable injustices the system inflicts upon certain segments of the population.
hahaha. and they think communism is the answer...ok fine whatever. dili nlng ko makiglalis ana. u better ask those ex-NPA's what they can say about that matter.
asa man ka mangita ug system nga walay some sort of injustice gud. if u say inumerable, did it reach intolerable levels, or to the point of international criticism? well, u could say the extra-judicial killings of journalists and activists caught the world's attention. that's a sad fact that we must deal with, especially by our gov't.

Originally Posted by
gareb
that's just it. what the president will never mention, and will never include in her political bulletins, are the actual facts behind the supposedly-strengthening peso. which sector of the economy is expanding, and who is benefiting from this? which sector is contracting and how many people are affected? removing the factor of the weakening dollar, how much really has the peso strengthened? the entrance of massive foreign capital can affect the size of the economy; with the impeding US recession, are there guarantees that the investment will stay put, or will there be somewhat a repeat of the 1997 economic crisis with capital abruptly leaving the country? is the growth, as well as the strengthening of the peso, sustainable?
well, do we have to anchor our opinions to political bulletins only? besides, the president doesn't need to provide detailed litanies of the whole economic situation day by day...and to add, we have every resources available to research for facts, and that includes the internet...
and mind u, i believe they are doing their best. but maybe not good enough for some.

Originally Posted by
gareb
when you have a president who is adamant that the questions of her political legitimacy is offset by supposed achievements, however questionable these are too, it is not news that she can and will try to portray her administration as doing "considerable progress", a line that has been swallowed, hook, line and sinker by not a few here.
what can u do if u are in her shoes? that is assuming the questions of her political legitimacy is offset by supposed achievements...and saying that people have been swallowing, hook, line and sinker, well good for them. that is their opinion and u can not say u r a better thinker than them...

Originally Posted by
gareb
people fear deviancy as if it's always bad, thinking that the established order is always good. it is simply pathetic.
maybe not pathetic to some...especially if radical or negative leaders na ang gi-istoryahan.

Originally Posted by
gareb
to grab power, of course. but Maoism isn't exactly the only political ideology that advocates a military solution to a political problem. preservation of the current status quo's ideology of "democracy" (their own usage) also requires them/it to use an armed approach.
of course. to grab power and to maintain the current status quo...and there's no need to discuss that further.

Originally Posted by
gareb
there are very distinct and significant differences between how the NPA and the AFP operates, as armed components and as political units of the revolutionary government and the state, respectively; a fact that AFP strategists themselves have admitted.
yup. simply put, NPA operates as a guerilla, the AFP as counter-guerilla.

Originally Posted by
gareb
it's strange that you speak of the supposedly "representative democracy" that we have now, thinking that the kind of democracy we have really is mere "electoral legitimization" of entrenched political dynasties who do not readily represent the interest of the people. again, i need not tell you how elections work and who and what kind of people have the best chance of being elected.
Let's refresh the term. "Representative democracy" involves the selection of government officials by the people being represented. The most common mechanisms involve election of the candidate with a majority or a plurality of the votes.
while the representatives are elected by the people to act in their interest, they retain the freedom to exercise their own judgment as how best to do so.
so when you talk about how elections work and who and what kind of people have the best chance of being elected here sa Pinas, well, all i can say is this, it is not perfect...and we need to improve it more.
that is why "cha-cha" is often discussed and debated whether to changes our form of government to "parliamentary democracy".

Originally Posted by
gareb
as for the NPA's brand of "democracy", well, who wants to stand up in their name and explain exactly how democracy is suppose to work, and how it actually works, inside the revolutionary government. the problem is, to we have the open mind to digest these ideas, or are we, as you have mentioned before , quick to impose labels to those things we have been trained to distrust?
what do u mean "open our minds and digest"? to the communist ideals? i already explained prior that i'm not in favor. do u need me to open up my mind more?
in a nutshell, here is the "democracy" the CPP-NPAs wanted: In a communist government, the community owns the major resources and means of production. The goal of such a system is to prevent any one person or group of people from becoming radically rich, while others are extremely poor. The system attempts to eliminate lower class by balancing the wealth between rich and poor, therefore giving everyone equal pay and ownership.
Too good to be true. Unfortunately, this results in an increased lower class.
In theory, everyone is equal in a communist government, however this is not true in many aspects. When only one person controls a communist government, it’s not far off from totalitarianism, as that one voice is the only one that really matters.
now in contrast, in a Democracy, free enterprising is permitted, and smiled upon. Here, free enterprising helps the economy to flourish. People can organize their own businesses and receive their own profits if it succeeds, or debts if it fails. In this system, the harder a person works, the more money they receive, allowing them to ‘make ends meet.’
In a democracy, however, every citizen has an equal say in government. Suffrage rights apply to men and women alike, regardless of race, past education, heritage, etc.
source: communism vs democracy by pipingdilat.
As Winston Churchill once said, "The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries. Generally, Democracy’s seem be more successful economically."

Originally Posted by
gareb
only because it is a valid example. obsolete? does it explain current social realities? if so, then it is not as obsolete as we think it is.
opportunism? true. read Machiavelli. or perhaps, taken out of context, this is another negative rendering of a situation that would otherwise be "taking advantage of a favorable circumstance" if it happened to a more favored entity?
obsolete? yes. what current social reality? the fact that the NPA is here as one of the promoters of the Communism idea to gain power and opportunity, now that is the current social reality.
Opportunism? Machiavelli? i know. (in fact, i have a good book about Machiavelli). Opportunism applies to both NPA and AFP. it is one of the most important military virtues.

Originally Posted by
gareb
it was you yourself who said that the CPP-NPA is "taking advantage" or being "opportunitsic" in latching on people's frustrations, even quoting Ramon Magsaysay himself.

it is but natural that when these grievances and injustices are addressed, there would be no logical reason to support an armed struggle as an expression of a non-existent frustration. their mass base, the lifeblood of the underground movement would simply wither away.
then again, in the current socio-political and socio-economicl set up, i'd gladly have my d*ck cut off if could ever have something that would resemble equality and freedom from destitution in the truest sense of the word.
of course, Magsaysay na gud na, IDOL!... u r talking of an "ideal" scenario which is impossible to achieve.
and u can save ur d*ck from being cut off this time.

Originally Posted by
gareb
oh, i admire your sources of information for being so accurate, as well as complete.
oh, u don't know the NPA's "Oplan Bushfire"? how sad gud...

Originally Posted by
gareb

gez man, you really should study more on what Lenin meant by that, and how the former USSR and China aren't the only possible expressions of socialism and communism, as well as how the word "empire" is used.
haha. i know btaw, and i don't need to study more of Lenin. besides, i'm not a fan of socialism, communism, and marxism or whatever cocktail you can mix with them in the first place.
my only point is, wherever you go, there is always a form of "imperialism" going on, ma-Pinas, US, Russia, N. Korea or China ka. and there is always injustice, and marginalization...unless you are dreaming of Utopia.