A Figure of a ghost priest caught by a digicam: Fake or Not?

[ceannix]

---

This is just a hoax. Daghan na kaayo mabuhat sa camera without using any digital enhance software. Try to figure it out and make your own ghost pics.

[AnGelicFace_07]

hala fake bitaw.. ka klaro sad anang gi edit woi.. saunz

[jo-anne]

bitaw noh..

[nolex]

hala naa lagi tawo nagwear og white t-shirt, nagrelo pa jud... kinsa d i na?? di ninyo makita noh?? meaning ako ray makakita d i..

[Fairksins2]

Father, pasaylo-an cla kay wla cla kibaw sa ilng gibuhat....

[wilner]

mao ang tawo kay klaro kaayo gaunsa na sya?

[pathfinder]

my opinion,..
edited.

[gilbz]

a hoax...yes! edited...NO!

why?

because no digital manipulation using a pixel-based software like photoshop has been done here. thus, the term "edited" does not apply. how did they make this "composite image" without software manipulation or "editing" then?...go back to page 1 of this thread and read about the technique used on REPLY# 13.

materials: a digicam, a cut-out image and a clear glass.

[kindredzero]

hahaha i like the perodolic affect hehehe, corection lang po ectoplasmic residue is a combination of dust and water lolz its not somthing you capture on cam!!!!! hhmmm................. why not!!!!!! hehehehe lolz paano po jung di to ectoplasmic meron lang nag mas****ate nya gi pahid nganha hehehehe pariha rabaya na sila itsura sa ngitngit hehehehehehehehe!!!!!!!!!!!! yaks!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[john_yo]

kulang paman ni sa practice ang nag himo oi.... hahaha ka lkaro na fake baya ana.