the runaway groom should be castrated!!!!
![]()
ok rani uy, atleast wa jud cya nidayun sa babae nga di niya love..diba?..kaysa maka sala siya sa Ginoo, dagan nalang..hahaha!![]()
it doesn't work that way. if the groom loses the case and the judgment becomes final, the decision will be executed. that means the sheriff will levy on whatever property the groom has that would be enough to pay the amount of the judgment. there's no contempt of court for failing to pay the amount. otherwise, that would be violating the constitutional prohibition against imprisonment for non-payment of a debt.[br]Posted on: March 04, 2008, 09:44:21 PM_________________________________________________Originally Posted by diem
a case like this was decided by the Supreme Court way back in 1964 - wassmer vs. velezOriginally Posted by mojak2007
agosh murag dli na jud masikatan ug adlaw ang guy ani.. saun tawn pg pay sa damages and churvah kung sa funeral parlor rani work... priso! priso! priso!

i think it was a force marriage gyud. Naa gyud to wrong ang babaye or wala lang gyud niya bantayi ang iya banahonon for some strange reactions like "not loving her anymore", unya mi force gyud siya pakasal. Mao na.
but he was still wrong to abandon her sa altar.
grabeh oi, dapat P10M iya gi ask for moral damages
The guy is simply so stupid.
oops tymsa ha,
di ba naay part sa marriage ceremony nga "if anybody here present doesn't want the marriage to take place, please speak up"? i dunno if this is the exact phrase but i usually see this in american movies...
maybe this is just a case of a man in a dilemma which of the 2 or 3 ladies he "really" wants to marry...as the song goes, "Si Lorna o si Aida o si Fe"...
it's just that maybe in our Filipino culture, nobody would expect that will happen. such a rare sight indeed!!!
correct me lang if im wrong...
Similar Threads |
|