Also- as the book Hyperwage discussed- if hyperwage is implemented, employees will have to be multi-tasking and should be more productive to enjoy the hyperwage employment. Its like when you were given a raise, will you work harder?
Also- as the book Hyperwage discussed- if hyperwage is implemented, employees will have to be multi-tasking and should be more productive to enjoy the hyperwage employment. Its like when you were given a raise, will you work harder?
I believe that workers here already receive the "13th month" bonus, don't they? Also, remittances from abroad typically increase during the Christmas season anyway from due to the "giving" nature of the holiday. I think that it would be more accurate to refer to these two existing dynamics as being a part of the "current system" than it would be to claim it as a benefit of Hyperwage Theory... Neither the employer nor the family member abroad could sustain the above described monetary increases on a daily/weekly/monthly basis. It's hard enough doing it just one month out of the year.
all people of the philippines 5 year old above will commit suicide including me, and raised a new breed of person fro 4 year old below
The issue isn't whether or not Filipinos "deserve" a better salary. Of course they do. But that question takes it out of the economic policy arena and unfairly turns it into a humanitarian issue. It would be wonderful if EVERYONE in the world received higher salaries, right? The difficult part is solving the "how to do it" puzzle.. A vast number of American college graduates must also resort to working in minimum wage jobs (store cashiers, fast food restos, etc.) after being laid off. They, too may be highly skilled in an area other than their current job description, but in what way does that generate the sale of more burgers or prove to be beneficial at the check-out counter? If you increase their wages dramatically, will either any business reap sufficient financial reward to cover the cost of the salary increases for all of those employees?
Not sure if I understand something here.. Could you please clarify who specifically is enslaving Filipinos? I trust that you aren't attempting to assign blame to any group outside of the RP.. The World Bank just loaned the RP 71 million dollars, and I'm wondering whose pockets it will line instead of reaching its intended destination (as outlined in the "loan application" to the WB).. Poverty could be reduced dramatically with a reduction in Gov't corruption and a a thoughtful approach to population control. A monthly salary of 10,000p can normally support an individual, but not if that individual who has 5 or 6 children (or more). That's an INDIVIDUAL responsibility issue that seems to be overlooked when addressing the causes of poverty here. And I know that pop. control is a touchy subject...
I'm posting a lot of things that I have posted pages back to those new posters here. You can view previous pages.
71 million dollars- yes, and it will not have a dent on reducing poverty. Whats worst- my granchildren's children will pay for its interest, not the entire debt.
Will reduced corruption reduce poverty? from what I understand, it will not put food directly on the table, but surely, hyperwage will.
the ones enslaving Filipinos is the system of low wages- Thats called the Strategy of Poverty in the Hyperwage Theory
Similar Threads |
|