DOG TIPS about breeding , buying and selling

[brian joshua]

---

in spite of all the puppy mills here, if you know the natural character of the breed then you should know how to select a puppy. bisan pag puppy mill ra na nimo napalit, dli tanan puppies ana bati. ayaw lng pd ninyo i-breed. the fact that not all people can afford to buy from renowned "responsible and reputable" breeders who knew nothing about being a responsible owner in behalf of the irony. daghan dri nga nindot kaug bloodline ilang dogs pero bati pagka-atiman, way disciplina, magkalisod ipatrain nlng sa lain trainer, unya ang mga anak mahal kau kay tungod lng sa bloodline. they cannot even discipline their own dogs. take note "cannot" is different from "do not"!

owning a puppy should begin with:
research about the breed
observation of the puppies
careful selection and responsibility.

“There is no such thing as a problem breed. However, there is no shortage of 'problem owners' - millan

[SPRINGFIELD_XD_40]

^^^^

The problem here though is if you PATRONIZED the PUPPY MILL INDUSTRY , you are part of the problem instead of the solution .

[brian joshua]

did i promote? my thoughts; people who can't afford are deprived of the privilege to own a dog. does the 87 consti declared such procrastination? no.

[SPRINGFIELD_XD_40]

The thought of your statements promotes the importance of the PUPPY MILL INDUSTRY to the people who " cant afford " which is by the way a wrong outlook . It doesnt take the " cant afford " individuals to resort to PUPPY MILL products but a good research and homework prior to the purchase of dogs or any pet for that matter . There are lots of resources , even adoption is available .

Usahay man gug kita bitaw murag korek . Estudyante pa gani na allowance ra ang gi saligan , mangambisyon dayon ug say Frenchie , English Bulldogs , etc . Then locates a backyard breeder because its cheaper if walay papeles . Isnt that picture big enough yet for us to figure out its an unbecoming of being " an animal lover " to start with because that is the reason why we want to own pets ?

On a serious note , if you really are a DOG LOVER , you are already loving the dogs na bisan di pa gani ka maka afford , you wont buy 1 usa and try to raise it as if you really loved the dog .

Nobody cares about your procastination here , the real issue is not the priority of people to acquire ownership but to gain leverage through knowledge of how it is supposed to done in the right time and right place . Would you mind to exchange shoes with the canines if thats the case ?

By the way , the word IF warrants the idea wether you are promoting or not but the idea alone portrays , you wont even know if the dog you get is pure breed much more in knowing which one is a pet type or which one is show quality . I would really like to know from your end how you would do that . I know , just checking if it matches what I know .

[Justice`Hugo]

did i promote? my thoughts; people who can't afford are deprived of the privilege to own a dog. does the 87 consti declared such procrastination? no.

How do you know much about the 1987 Constitution? Who the hell cares if you cannot afford to own a professionally bred dog? Bantog ra diay nanaghan ang kawatan sa kalibutan kay kung dili kaaford mopalit ug butang, kawaton nalang. Is it the deprivation you are talking about?

Read REPUBLIC ACT NO. 8485 AN ACT TO PROMOTE ANIMAL WELFARE IN THE PHILIPPINES, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS "THE ANIMAL WELFARE ACT OF 1998."

[brian joshua]

your on the wrong track bro...read it, did i really promote buying from puppy mills? and then take another look from my post. what i meant with bisan puppy mill ra na cla is the present mishaps of the people. since naa na cla ana they should take care of them like how you treat a 30k pup. discouraging them not to buy again is a good idea.

besides, where did you get the idea with IF? insofar as im concerned, im reflecting only with the "how and why". i bet you have already mustered taking care of dogs? yes?. if you dont want "them" to buy from puppy mills, then discourage them because i for one have undergone this type of premonition of the so called pros. i reminded them to buy from reputable breeders but they did not listen to me. however, i saw their dogs delightful, obedient and never brought them problems.

Henceforth, this is the reason why i said in my post not too long ago, na bisan naa kay napalit from puppy mills, dli na lng sd na nimo ampingan. ampingan giapon kay mahalon or di mahalon pareha cla iro. what you said about adoption is a very excellent idea. i have adopted 5 dogs already in my 14-year-run surrounded with these furballs. But one does not simply adopt because he/she wants a cute cuddly puppy. that's what most people thought of. mao nga ayaw dayun panghusga kung unsa ako gipost kay you have your own claim i have mine too...

and by the way, i do not care if you have that kind of mentality thinking that you are a dog owner yourself.

[brian joshua]

How do you know much about the 1987 Constitution? Who the hell cares if you cannot afford to own a professionally bred dog? Bantog ra diay nanaghan ang kawatan sa kalibutan kay kung dili kaaford mopalit ug butang, kawaton nalang. Is it the deprivation you are talking about?

Read REPUBLIC ACT NO. 8485 AN ACT TO PROMOTE ANIMAL WELFARE IN THE PHILIPPINES, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS "THE ANIMAL WELFARE ACT OF 1998."

c'mon, why so mad bro? is there a definition of puppy mill in that by-law? Missouri is the puppy mill capital of america, and they are passing a law to illegalize this and ours were drafted according to theirs...is there? oh hell no. i don't care about your dogs, and i know that you're dealing this very deep within the structures of your mind. however, can you identify who's the kawatan? the buyer or the breeder? di mn mo kahibaw mobasa gd pataka lng mog yaw2x...basaha ang post dli kay ang 1st sentence lng. pagka nman lng jd. i did not attack anyone of you i posted it so that those who have owned an "illegitimate" puppy, alagaan nlng ug muprevent nga magbreed! di lng unta maglatagaw ato huna2x sunod ha? wa mn ko nakig-away ra ba kamo ra nikalit ug lalis.

[Justice`Hugo]

c'mon, why so mad bro? is there a definition of puppy mill? Missouri is the puppy mill capital of america, and they are passing a law to illegalize this and ours were drafted according to theirs...is there? oh hell no. i don't care about your dogs, and i know that you're dealing this very deep within the structures of your mind. however, can you identify who's the kawatan? the buyer or the breeder? di mn mo kahibaw mobasa gd pataka lng mog yaw2x...basaha ang post dli kay ang 1st sentence lng. pagka nman lng jd. i did not attack anyone of you i posted it so that those who have owned an "illegitimate" puppy, alagaan nlng ug muprevent nga magbreed! di lng unta maglatagaw ato huna2x sunod ha? wa mn ko nakig-away ra ba kamo ra nikalit ug lalis.

Well, don't show your ignorance here. Part of my Constitutional rights is freedom of speech and expression. But I do it carefully. Exercise yours with utmost care also. Mouth zipped <<<<<<<<<<<.

[brian joshua]

Part of my Constitutional rights is freedom of speech and expression. But I do it carefully. Exercise yours with utmost care also. <<<<<<<<<<<.

did I not partake my freedom of speech and expression? your ad hom is not a privilege my dear friend. you may have spoken what was in your mind but you can not attack anyone. In the first place, if you've read well my previous post, then technically you could've certainly guessed it right that i was simply reacting to the argument and not against you per se. but then kalit lng kag kasuko mura kag bata.

[Justice`Hugo]

:OT

did I not partake my freedom of speech and expression? your ad hom is not a privilege my dear friend. you may have spoken what was in your mind but you can not attack anyone. In the first place, if you've read well my previous post, then technically you could've certainly guessed it right that i was simply reacting to the argument and not against you per se. but then kalit lng kag kasuko mura kag bata.

You read more about Argumentation and Debate books. Argumentum Ad Hominem does not apply here. I did not attack your person or character. How could I? I don't know you, and I am not your friend. I simply attacked your statements. Do you think it's fallacious?



Sorry boss SPRINGFIELD. I will go back to the topic.