To RCruman :
Bro kanang 6 books nga wala gi apil sa Protestant nga Bible wat is your reason ana ?
To RCruman :
Bro kanang 6 books nga wala gi apil sa Protestant nga Bible wat is your reason ana ?
Ang sakto nga Christian Church is nag Base sa Bible alone wala na lain .... wala na mixture nga human traditionOriginally Posted by dartzed
nice answer... heheheOriginally Posted by amingb
but please explain in John the authority that was given by God to the priest... bible man kaha ang sundon..
dili man cguro kang John na ang basis sa Vatican sa Peter man cguro na ...Originally Posted by dartzed
The Bible Describe 1 Peter 2:5-9 describes believers as a “holy priesthood” and a “royal priesthood.” Revelation 1:6 and 5:10 both describe believers as “a kingdom and priests.”
So kita as truely believers we are considered a priest ...
uhuh naa u point but naa dako au kalahian sa priest ug kita..Originally Posted by amingb
kbaw ka unsa na?.. f makaanswer ka ana then natubag na imo mga questions..
i dont need to explain na..
hehehe aw cge hatagi ko verse na walay authority ang priest na murevise?...
Mao ni imoha pasabot ..
John 20:23, “If you forgive anyone his sins, they are forgiven; if you do not forgive them, they are not forgiven."
Mis interpreted gihapon na sa Catholic
There are several problems with this interpretation. (1) John 20:23 nowhere mentions confession of sin. (2) John 20:23 nowhere promises, or even hints, that the authority to forgive sins would be passed on to the successors of the apostles. Jesus’ promise was specifically directed to the apostles. (3) The New Testament nowhere states that the apostles would even have successors to their apostolic authority. Similarly, Catholics point to Matthew 16:19 and 18:18 (binding and loosing) as evidence for the Catholic Church’s authority to forgive sins. The same three above points apply equally to these Scriptures.
Again, the concept of confession of sin to a priest is nowhere taught in Scripture. We are to confess our sins to God (1 John 1:9). As New Covenant believers, we do not need mediators between us and God. We can go to God directly because of Jesus’ sacrifice for us. 1 Timothy 2:5, “For there is one God and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus.”
not the verse only the whole chapter basaha ug unsa buot ipasabot.. ug kinsa iya gisultian ug kinsa ang nalamdagan sa espiritu santo..Originally Posted by amingb
Ang iyaha gi sultihan ana is ang mga Apostle.. it is only directed purely to the ApostleOriginally Posted by dartzed
correct!!... ky why man sa ila man gisulti bro unsa jud dai ang main reason sa ginuo?...Originally Posted by amingb
ask yourself daw if unsa jud...
the Apostle mura na cla ug Ambassador of Christ .. ang Enternal purpose of God for the apostle is for need to prepare the Church.Originally Posted by dartzed
Peter was the Apostle to the Jews (Galatians 2:, therefore his central "message" was that Jesus of Nazareth was the "Messiah, the Son of God" (Matthew 16:16).
Paul was the Apostle to the Gentiles (Galatians 2:7), therefore his central "message" was "that the Gentiles should be fellow heirs, and of the same body, and partakers of his promises in Christ by the gospel" (Ephesians 3:6).
Similar Threads |
|