Discussion on the Christ Jesus.

[rcruman]

---

naloko na...

kinsay may ni-ingon nga wala mahisulat tanan bah?

wa man tingali ko mag-ingon...

ayaw patakag kuhag issue bro, dili ang pagakasulat sa tanan ang issue kungdi ang imo giingon nga SPONE FEED.

No matter how we try to read and memorize the verses of the bible the understanding is still the perogative of God to give it to you.
Even a lowest man can understand the bible if they will turn to the reproof of GOd, thats the requirements.

Peace!

[tripwire]

so para sa imoha kinahanglan gyud og bulpin og papil aron makasulat?
Bro wala kay idea nga puede makasulat sa tablet of stones, animal skin og uban pa.
Try to research bro dont limit writtings in ballpen and papers alone.

Peace!

Don't be too serious sir, for all we know the guy was just joking with no harm or guilt intentions but to make it more fun to read. Lighten up!

[tripwire]

Even a lowest man can understand the bible if they will turn to the reproof of GOd, thats the requirements.

Peace!

Question lang sir, what do you mean by "lowest man"?

[dieseldust]

^^^grabeha sad nimo bro oi, bugal2x na man na.

[amingb]

^^^grabeha sad nimo bro oi, bugal2x na man na.

iyaha sab na balos2x lang gud ta diri sa Forum .... basta wala lay personalay

[forester]

There are points to consider in answering this question.

1. What is this question "why did Jesus didn't write?" ? This question is a speculative query. Why? Because the basis of the question is hinged on the absence of writing which is, in the first place, uncertain.

2. Was the absence of any writing in the hand of Jesus an evidence that he had not written any? The answer is no. The absence of writing is only a SUGGESTIVE INDICATOR that he had not written any, but cannot be considered as a solid evidence showing that he had not written any piece. Just as it cannot be shown in any text that Jesus urinated - is not an evidence that he did not.

3. Is it a possibility that Jesus was an illiterate? Again, it is specualtive. However, there are text that he read the scriptures in the Cenagoga (Luke.4:16) which indicates that he knew how to read. And in John.8, he wrote something in the sand during the time Magdalene was almost stoned to death, which again indicates that he knew how to write.

4. Had he written something? No one knows at this time. For many years, we shall not assume that it is easy to prove the existence of a writing which could have been written 2000 yrs ago.

5. Is the question suggesting that Jesus may not have exist in reality? (meaning, he was just an extraordinary super hero character in the old tales). I am not a "Jesus expert", so it is wise to leave this matter to his believers.

6. Is the question trying to relate Jesus with any extraordinary man who left no writing piece? Perhaps. But to note, there are also a lot of extraordinary men who wrote many things and left a written legacy to the people of today.

I wish I had not offended any feelings.

[lightning_mcqueen95]

unya wa pa sab mauso ang typewriter ug computer niadto

seriously, Jesus had been given only 33 yrs to complete his work (preaching, teaching, healing, etc). writing was not part of the agenda.

unya kun ang nag write bro bakakun? Unsa un nato pag sure nga naa teching, healing ug uban pa nga gibuhat si Jesus?..... unsa man ato kati bayan?

[lightning_mcqueen95]

then why not do your research bro if writtings should be from typewriter , computer.
where did you get this information that Christ were given 33 yrs to complete his work(preaching, teaching, healing, etc.)?

Did you see a leader that will write?
LIke GMA shes a leader, is it appropriate for her to write?
Christ instructed and inspired apostles and prophets to write.

I suggest before posting regarding with the bible make sure it should be from the verses of the bible.

Peace!

How sure ka nga true na gisulat sa bible about Jesus? Naka kita gyud ka? Dili ka Sure kay ni basa raman pud ka sa biblya gud....

Ang ako pasabot kun unsa gyud ka ka sure nga mao na ang gibuhat ni Jesus during ato nga time?

what if kun na makak pud to ang ni sulat? naa baka ebidensya nga true gyud na? nana ka ato na time?
o ni basa ra pud ka sa mga sinulat?

hehehe... peace...

[e_l_q]

is this biblical?

RC, you dont have to post this question kay ikaw mismo kahibaw na sa tubag ini. Ikaw pa, nga kada reply nimo mo quote man dayon ka ug verse sa bible.

[NASYO]

"JESUS ALONE SAVE or SAVES"

si Jesus ra jud tali maluwas kay gamhanan man kuno cya sa pagkasulat sa naghimo sa bibliya..

kung wala lang tali relihiyon no.. walay kagubot jud.. dili magpinatyanay..
therefore, kita diay tanan makaluwas nato. walay MAGIK2X..

Magik2X man lagi nang inyo istoyahan oi.. Dili ko kasakay..

maayo pay maminaw na lang mo sa kanta ni John Lennon nga "Imagine"