conspiracy theories

[Soul Doctor]

---

you are showing us the Trans Lunar Injection.
Why not show us the Lunar landing.

because according to the diagram. the module will finally orbit the moon.
but it doesn't show that it would land.

that is why all the modules sent to the moon crashed.

and they said they did it on purpose to know the effect of the modules to the surface of the moon.
That was all B.S..

[THE SKULLS]

Another question I'm posing to both you and Soul Doctor.

1. You both agree nga the reason they both (US vs. Russia) wanted to go to the moon, i.e. ga-lumba sila?

2. Ok if you say "yes" to the question above, then surely, both side would have set up monitoring systems (clandestine or overt) with their CIA or KGB, to make sure of the progress of both sides, kung tinood ba dyud ilang accomplishments...so they must have set up sophisticated surveillance equipment to monitor each other....you agree with this?

3. So you also agree that if say, Russia had a means to monitor the Apollo mission, then they can publish data showing the Lunar Module heading towards the moon, yes?

Well, here's the checkmate guys. The Russians DID track the SIV+CSM+LM stack as it headed towards the moon And here's a Russian website (translated to English) that proves it:

Translation result for http://www.novosti-kosmonavtiki.ru/content/numbers/271/03.shtml

-RODION

are these all spy data? pagklaro Rods oi. duol na unta ka, Doc told yu na 50 - 50 na iya pagtu-o. Na-convince na sad ko hapit. Pastilan.

Ngano maglumba man sila nga behind man kaayo ang US? Ahehehe.
Mao bitaw naay Walt Disney. Kasabot ka Rods?

[rodsky]

you are showing us the Trans Lunar Injection.
Why not show us the Lunar landing.

because according to the diagram. the module will finally orbit the moon.
but it doesn't show that it would land.

that is why all the modules sent to the moon crashed.

and they said they did it on purpose to know the effect of the modules to the surface of the moon.
That was all B.S..

So let me see if I get this straight... you acknowledge that it's possible for Apollo astronauts to have orbited the moon, but NOT land on it?

-RODION

[rodsky]

are these all spy data? pagklaro Rods oi. duol na unta ka, Doc told yu na 50 - 50 na iya pagtu-o. Na-convince na sad ko hapit. Pastilan.

Ngano maglumba man sila nga behind man kaayo ang US? Ahehehe.
Mao bitaw naay Walt Disney. Kasabot ka Rods?

Yes these are available in Russian Government archives. The Russians publicly acknowledge that the LMs all reached the moon.

Your argument makes no sense. If "ahead" ang mga Russians, and they detected that the landings were indeed faked, then why didn't the Russians file a protest to the international community nga gi-fake lang sa Americans ilang moon landing? In fact they bowed out after the N1 explosions.

-RODION

[THE SKULLS]

basa sa ko sa link gipanghatag nimo Rods. It may take time na ma-absorb nako. Pasensya na ha.

Gravity

I want to know more about gravity

[rodsky]

Maybe, I could have a great help for them. Who knows?



Isn't it a valid answer to your question Rods? Russian made aren't same with US.

Let's make the question more specific: What makes the Lunokhod different from the LM?

Because if you say "There's no difference", then you acknowledge nga what the Lunokhod can do, the LM can also do. If you accept that, then your argument is destroyed, because the Lunokhod successfully orbited, landed and even drove across the surface of the moon.

-RODION

[Soul Doctor]

basa sa ko sa link gipanghatag nimo Rods. It may take time na ma-absorb nako. Pasensya na ha.

Gravity

I want to know more about gravity

ingat bai, basin manosebleed ka. hehe.

ang Luna1 was designed to crash land in the moon, but it missed the moon,
now its in orbit with the Sun between the Earth and Mars.
Mao ni mahitabo sa Lunar Module kung masipyat silag gamay.
Mao nga nakaingon ko nga risky ang pagland softly sa moon using trans lunar injection.
Mas maayo pa nga i-crash landing nimo sa moon kay sigurado pa.

[THE SKULLS]

Let's make the question more specific: What makes the Lunokhod different from the LM?

Because if you say "There's no difference", then you acknowledge nga what the Lunokhod can do, the LM can also do. If you accept that, then your argument is destroyed, because the Lunokhod successfully orbited, landed and even drove across the surface of the moon.

-RODION

Would you like to say nga pareho lang sila? Mao ni ako nasabtan sa buot nimo ipasabot.

Pero dako kaayo sila kala-inan oi kumpara sa US made.
kay:

1. political reasons (cold war)

[THE SKULLS]

that is why all the modules sent to the moon crashed.

all of it were designed for crash landings.

crash landing man jud tingali ang entry sa moon surface. mao man jud na i-assume nila daan. mao sad na mga approach tingali sa mga modules na ipadala. like rovers.

ang apollo kaha no, gipa-crash sad tingali to. aguroy.

[Soul Doctor]

What if, the apollo lunar module did not really land on the moon?
What if they just orbit around it for days and swing back to earth later and orbit around earth some more.
that's the reason why they have to fake the landing because landing is highly problematic
and they choose not to land.

no one in russia would know if they really land on the moon right?
all they know is the module left earth and on its way to the moon.