The Only Source of Truth?

[Ramini]

---

@regnauld

wla jd noh?..my inquiry is left unanwered..hmmm..nway cge go!..i won't push my luck nlang

[bluedes]

uhhh.. not so. where is everywhere? but nowhere. therefore, somebody made a wrong conclusion.

uhh.. what wrong conclusion? how can truth be everywhere and nowhere at the same time?
basic laws of logic, a thing cannot be one and the opposite at the same time.. that's a falsity.. how can something be black and white at the same time? maybe its gray? unless you speak of a third identity, then maybe that's your truth.. in this case, you'd have to define what is not everywhere, and not nowhere at the same time.. every-no-where? hehehe.. this is funny..

anyway, in our universe, as far as i'm concerned, if you say that truth is everywhere and nowhere, you're basically implying that there is no truth, and everything is just false...

[Hellblazer 2.1]

uhh.. what wrong conclusion? how can truth be everywhere and nowhere at the same time?
basic laws of logic, a thing cannot be one and the opposite at the same time.. that's a falsity.. how can something be black and white at the same time? maybe its gray? unless you speak of a third identity, then maybe that's your truth.. in this case, you'd have to define what is not everywhere, and not nowhere at the same time.. every-no-where? hehehe.. this is funny..

anyway, in our universe, as far as i'm concerned, if you say that truth is everywhere and nowhere, you're basically implying that there is no truth, and everything is just false...

is there an absolute truth, sir?

[bluedes]

is there an absolute truth, sir?

I don't know... If I did, I wouldn't tell you either..
ewan ko.. define absolute truth?

[Hellblazer 2.1]

i guess it could be anything. considering each person's different points of view and system of belief, the truth could be biased. it could be any person's interpretation of scripture of events.

[bluedes]

i guess it could be anything. considering each person's different points of view and system of belief, the truth could be biased. it could be any person's interpretation of scripture of events.

if absolute truth could be anything, it could also be nothing, diba?

[Hellblazer 2.1]

if absolute truth could be anything, it could also be nothing, diba?

that is also a possibility.

[bluedes]

that is also a possibility.

so how do you define this absolute truth really? if it can't be defined, does it even exist in the first place?

[Hellblazer 2.1]

i was gonna ask you the same thing. there's no need to be sarcastic.

[bluedes]

i was gonna ask you the same thing. there's no need to be sarcastic.

cool lng bro.. wala akong sarcasm dito.. jz having fun..