Supreme Court declares PDAF unconstitutional

[mandix]

wa nay negosyo ang mga cnatong and tong s man

[dexlimp]

d na kapa escort service ang mga senatong ug tongressman ani sa mga artista

[judge3ni]

@Renz8

Naa koy gamay nakita diri legality about sa previous pdaf ....

He said the 2013 General Appropriations Act (GAA) violated the Constitution when it gave Cabinet Secretaries the President’s power to realign savings and required the concurrence of both chambers of Congress to realign and release funds.

In the past, the High Court upheld the system's constitutionality. But the PDAF in the 2013 national budget was "a different animal," Carpio earlier said, because it made the identification of a lawmaker's project "mandatory" rather than "recommendatory."

meaning nasayop ra jud sila kadugayan og likoy2x sa balaud!hahaha og nadakpan ila kakawatan!


@Renz8: ang mga justices kay mu-decide ra jud tawon na sila based on the technicalites sa law na gi-present nila while gasubay sa Constitution.. bisan pa og by conscience or common knowledge kay sayop pero pag-examine sa law kay nisubay ra gihapon sa Constitution, wa na sila mahimo. So karon, nagisa sa ilang kaugalingon mantika ang mga gahimo ani.

Anyway, wa pa man nako nabasa ang full text sa decision. basa pa nya ko..