The Luciferian Doctrine

[JeKeRo]

---

Sakto ka brad... kai ako gani dri nanglimbawt na ako balhibo at the same tym kai naBITIN ko... atots baya aning dli ta mahimotang kong dli matuman a2ng needs oi.

[cobraKing]

asa nman ang other side sa story beh pra mohilom nami ug naa man kha na?

[malic_2]

dili nalang ni nato taason oi..

mas maayo pa idiga nana imong baraha.. ipakita nana imong other side of the story nga ancient manuscript bro aron among ma basa diri..

mas maayo man pod ng makasabot ka gud.

taas kaayo bai kong akong isuwat diri, e google na lang nya ato hisgutan diri.

[Scott Bernard]

Kayama ani oi.. hehehe!

Bitaws, whether tinood na literally ang story sa Fallen Angels, either way, it tells us that it is not good to be boastful, being self righteous, and envious towards our fellow man.

[malic_2]

if you wish to see further light..

Let there be light!!

yes let there be light( luci). come to the light so darkness will disappear.

Kayama ani oi.. hehehe!

Bitaws, whether tinood na literally ang story sa Fallen Angels, either way, it tells us that it is not good to be boastful, being self righteous, and envious towards our fellow man.

correct sir.

[necrotic freak]

asa nman ang other side sa story beh pra mohilom nami ug naa man kha na?

ipa google nalang kuno niya bro.

[malic_2]

kamo ba basin ang pasabot sa ts ani is si Lucifer of Cagliari. nalipat lang guro siya abi niya si Lucifer nga yawa daw matud pa sa Church. kato sigoro ning bishop nga Lucifer ang name.

[Sand Man]

I think most Christians are not prepared to know the "back stories" of the Holy Bible.

Even the book itself is not factual so it makes you wonder how the entire story evolved. Taas ug lawm kaayo ang mga background ani with multiple entities involved. Sakto ang gisulti sa uban diri -- naa mga manuscripts that you can read and study.

Pero unless you are prepared and willing to go the full length sa entire story, you will never appreciate the Holy Bible the way the scholars have. It is said na if subayon jud nimo ang mga events and people who were involved during Biblical times, ma-experience nimo ang full circle of belief -- starting with accepting the facts written, then as you read more you discover inconsistencies, so duna na ka doubt, then further reading leads you to realization, then finally acceptance.

And all this involves years and years of reading and analyzing scripts and manuscripts na tua gi-preserve sa Vatican.

[malic_2]

I think most Christians are not prepared to know the "back stories" of the Holy Bible.

Even the book itself is not factual so it makes you wonder how the entire story evolved. Taas ug lawm kaayo ang mga background ani with multiple entities involved. Sakto ang gisulti sa uban diri -- naa mga manuscripts that you can read and study.

Pero unless you are prepared and willing to go the full length sa entire story, you will never appreciate the Holy Bible the way the scholars have. It is said na if subayon jud nimo ang mga events and people who were involved during Biblical times, ma-experience nimo ang full circle of belief -- starting with accepting the facts written, then as you read more you discover inconsistencies, so duna na ka doubt, then further reading leads you to realization, then finally acceptance.

And all this involves years and years of reading and analyzing scripts and manuscripts na tua gi-preserve sa Vatican.

ganahan ko sa imong ponto bro. very accurate.

mao na matud pa ni Jack Nicholson..."you can't handle the truth".

[treize]

you mean storyang barbero?

the other side of the story is based on ancient manuscripts. mas tiguwang pa gani kaysa christian bible.

Kanang istoryaha bro karaan gyud na kay, mogawas gyud dayon na after sa initial story.

So kana imong gisulti nga tiguwang pa sa bible murag tinuod gyud na peru asa mani nag gikan ang naa sa bible? ayaw kog ingna mas gauna panang istoryaha nimo? Sama sa pangutana ni necrotic?