Parallel Universe a Science Hypocrisy?

[chad_tukes]

---

So you believe in GHOST now? The question is not hard after all.

no, i don't believe in ghosts---that's my straightforward answer.

now do me a favor and look HYPOTHESIS up in the dictionary.

[kebotDiNaMute]

no, i don't believe in ghosts---that's my straightforward answer.

now do me a favor and look HYPOTHESIS up in the dictionary.

that does not apply to me brad, you know why, i don't even believe in parallel universe... read my first post and first qoute

"beyond our senses"
--- tell me if this is scientific. and yes I think Ghost is beyond your senses...

[Malic]

Whats the lie about BIG BANG BRAD is the fact that it will prove the beggining of the Universe... did it? read all the materials about it then tell me are those things true? the idea is already messy u buy it then science said oops, its not what we think it is... big bang happen everytime, and there is no nothing exploding to something.

So what do you think again? you still denying things?

brad if i don't believe in atoms as the smallest, right now i ask you did you prove me WRONG? Sorry brad what you are trying to imply is your idea telling me im WRONG. If I dont believe in theory it doesnt matter because its no definite. But if dont believe in fact and TRUE then I will be denying to myself.

Simple raman unta kaau brad, if d ko mo 2o og theory ok lang dba? kay theory wala pa mana gi confirm. mo2o mo ok lang pod nako.. but telling me im WRONG then lets talk about your BIG BANG NOW, WHO IS WRONG?

Kebs...in the first place Science never claim BB theory as Absolute Truth. Yes the BB theory was formulated with observable data to explain the origin of the universe.


But the issue kebs is this...it isnt a lie...because what they are telling you is based on OBSERVABLE data. Mao ra man ang ila nakita kebs so mao ra pod ilang gi sulti. then later on as better technology showed them na Atom is not really the smallest particle so again they changed the theory.

mahimo ra ng lie kebs kung kita sila sa atom then mosulti sila nga still ang molecules mao ang smallest particle. gets kebs? But it didnt happen that way...they saw the Atom so they reported it. kung naay evidence then its not a lie. now as more evidence unfold showing nga the smallest particle is no longer the atom then mo ingon sila nga ang atom gihapon ang smallest particle then thats a lie. but kung ilang report is based on observable data then its not a lie.

[NASYO]

my POV

earth = an artist's canvass
people = different colors of palate (will blend to each other)

[Hellblazer 2.1]

my POV

earth = an artist's canvass
people = different colors of palate (will blend to each other)

and the artist is...?

[fritzd]

I am in no position to explain M theory or stuff. haha! Only a handful of people around the world can do that. But my professor told me who was studying starting to study about M theory that it is just basically an extension of Quantum Theory which includes Gravity as described by Einstien's General Relativity.

The thing with Quantum Theory is that an event can be described by wavefunctions. There can be many possible wavefunctions with certain probabilities. But when you do an experiment and you obtain a measurment, the wavefunctions you have calculated before will collapse to one of the wavefunctions. For example, you have caculated wavefunction A and B. In the experiement, you only measure wavefunction B. From then on, the outcome of the experiment will collapse to wavefunction B which means all measurements from then on will always yield B unless you change something in the experiement.

It is a very abstract manifestation of Schroedinger's cat in a box. You will never know if the cat is dead, alive or both not unless you open the box. In parallel Universes, this is also manifested in advanced quantum theory. The solution appears to be that there are many possible universes, in fact infinite, with infinite possibilities. This is not really properly understood. And we are still very very far from proving it. However, if there are many possible universes. This can be true for the future. There can be many possible events in the future, in fact infinite but when the future comes (tomorrow maybe) it will always collapse to one event which we know as the present and will never change. That is the way I see it. It could be wrong or maybe it is wrong. But one thing about science is that, innovations come from wild ideas that sprung out of theory. Einstein already derived rate equations for the LASER, 50 years before it was first constructed. In science, there is no such thing as hypocrisy. It could be wrong or right. Only time will tell. =0))

[hizuka007]

I am in no position to explain M theory or stuff. haha! Only a handful of people around the world can do that. But my professor told me who was studying starting to study about M theory that it is just basically an extension of Quantum Theory which includes Gravity as described by Einstien's General Relativity.

The thing with Quantum Theory is that an event can be described by wavefunctions. There can be many possible wavefunctions with certain probabilities. But when you do an experiment and you obtain a measurment, the wavefunctions you have calculated before will collapse to one of the wavefunctions. For example, you have caculated wavefunction A and B. In the experiement, you only measure wavefunction B. From then on, the outcome of the experiment will collapse to wavefunction B which means all measurements from then on will always yield B unless you change something in the experiement.

It is a very abstract manifestation of Schroedinger's cat in a box. You will never know if the cat is dead, alive or both not unless you open the box. In parallel Universes, this is also manifested in advanced quantum theory. The solution appears to be that there are many possible universes, in fact infinite, with infinite possibilities. This is not really properly understood. And we are still very very far from proving it. However, if there are many possible universes. This can be true for the future. There can be many possible events in the future, in fact infinite but when the future comes (tomorrow maybe) it will always collapse to one event which we know as the present and will never change. That is the way I see it. It could be wrong or maybe it is wrong. But one thing about science is that, innovations come from wild ideas that sprung out of theory. Einstein already derived rate equations for the LASER, 50 years before it was first constructed. In science, there is no such thing as hypocrisy. It could be wrong or right. Only time will tell. =0))

mao nay gitawag nga Uncertainty Principle.

There can be many possible events in the future, in fact infinite but when the future comes (tomorrow maybe) it will always collapse to one event which we know as the present and will never change.

mao nay gitawag nga Superposition Theory. unya mao pud na ang rason nganong kung mobalik ta sa past unya naa tay buhaton dd2 like patyon nimo imong mama, then inig balik nimo sa persent kay buhi gihapon imong mama walay nahitabo nga kausaban masking gamay (Time paradox).

unya regarding anang kay almighty kebs, mao nay nakapait sa theory brader kay dili pa jud solid as a metal (hehehehehe) ... pwede pa na maevolve pwede pud ma-dissolve.

Basta walay giingon ang science nga ang BB nga THEORY kay mali/dili tinuod/lie/dili mao/etc... pero daghan lang xa og explainations (THEORIES, width 'S' ha).

dili parihas anang sa bible kay kung unsay nakasulat is ABSOLUTE truth na dayon, dili na mangitag truth..wahihihihihih..

[rodsky]

Thread closed. Please read the rules and regulations of the science thread, thank you.

-RODION