"pag chur oi" is worse than "pag sure oi"
Results 51 to 60 of 75
-
02-10-2009, 04:00 PM #51
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Posts
- 1,924
-
02-14-2009, 10:40 PM #52Banned User
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Posts
- 58
Naa nabay actually? Samok kay ni nga line!
-
02-14-2009, 11:19 PM #53C.I.A.
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Posts
- 2,764
yacks...like for example
-
02-18-2009, 03:13 PM #54Junior Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Posts
- 169
kayasa do! << 1990's
-
02-18-2009, 05:58 PM #55Senior Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Posts
- 847
hala noh ug ah okay---- kay la naman masulti lain hehehe
-
02-23-2009, 07:26 AM #56
interesting sad ni...hehe!
-
02-23-2009, 03:15 PM #57Senior Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Posts
- 707
pinoy trademark jud...
-
02-26-2009, 03:14 AM #58Junior Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Posts
- 353
NOT UNLESS
I hate that. First, wrong grammar by context. It can be right if you mean it the other way around. Negative + negative = positive, so it defeats the purpose of mentioning it.
It should be "UNLESS" only.
I also don't like BASICALLY. It's used unnecessarily more often than not.
-
02-26-2009, 03:38 AM #59C.I.A.
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Posts
- 3,872
kanang pulong na "CHAR" unsa mana siya? maka bwiset jud paminawn labi na ang mo ingon mga babaye na OA ug mga bayot..
-
02-26-2009, 03:51 AM #60Elite Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Posts
- 1,140
pag sure oi, mao bah.. ky mura ba'g dli ko katuhuan
kayasa oi ug mayra....
Reply With Quote
Similar Threads |
|
Posting Permissions
|