What Scientist looking for is "GOD" and trying to get out of the picture.

[boomer]

it will be up to the people if they want to be misled. ('c',)

luring "weak" minds to their fold....for profitability is not a new thing. they can always play with words, hell...they can even threaten you with eternal torment.

[ix_888]

To describe the God/Creator/Source in words is to liken the SUN to a light bulb...

[rcruman]

[b]Wowwww...Grabiha noh...ako na hinoon nagpataka...basin sunod nimong post kay pataka napod ning mga scientists. Don't be ridiculous rcruman...this confirms that you don't really understand what you're talking or reading rcruman. PLEASE rcruman, use your head or at least research your references before you post them.

then prove it nga wala ka nagpataka.
I've researched it bro, but the problem is that you're searching to disprove while I'm searching to prove, where on the other end of the rope. So please stop making any personal comments just plain evidence and reference.

So for us to start let us tackle first HIGGS BOSON, just show your evidence and i will show mine.

PLEASE READ MY LIPS: the Higgs boson = "God's particle" (nothing to do with religion).

you're out of line bro, I didn't Higgs boson to Religion but rather I'm showing things here that Scientist who keep on denying God and searching for things to eliminate God in the picture by proving EVOLUTION and BIG BANG THEORY.

GOD'S PARTICLE is a layman's parlance for the Higg's boson for ordinary people like us to get a glimpse of the real source of the universe's origins. The Higg's boson is a namesake after Pete Higgs (considered to be one of the greatest physicists in the modern era) who theorized that the universe all came up from an initially weightless particles moving through a ubiquitous quantum field, which scientists also call a "Higgs field." Scientists illustrate the Higg's boson/God's particle "like a pearl necklace through a jar of honey" NOT necessarily a search for God by scientists as you called it...tsk...tsk...Ayaw pagtuga-tuga og explain kung di nimo kaya coz you will only look ridiculous (tambag na nga tinarong rcruman).

bro the issue here is not the word "GOD PARTICLE" the issue here is that the H particle or HIGGS BOSON, how, what and where is it.

There are things in this world that Science can't explain by observable data and yet it exist.

As a friend and a Christian rcruman and for you to understand this whole Higg's boson clearly and simply, I have researched them for you:
1) PLEASE READ this article from NEWSWEEK
2) Also to give you an idea about the Higgs boson Project... It is trying to probe the origin of the universe NOT necessarily an effort by scientist to look/search for a creator. PLEASE READ this article from TIME

And that Origin is God bro.
That Origin didn't make any Evolution or any big bang.

[b]Hahaha..wow, what a mission! What are you, some kinda superhero called Super RCruman? If you know your Bible well rcruman, God doesn't like to force himself to be believed kay naa may freewill ang tao! And here comes you, trying to be God's superhero to save mankind from atheists and non-ADD by "MISLEADING".

Did I force you anyone here, where just exchanging evidence and sources here, it was just you and some of your likes who act hestirical and settle to a personal attack.

AND BEST OF ALL...WHERE DO YOU SEE IN THE BIBLE THAT A CHRISTIAN HAS BEEN COMMANDED BY GOD TO "MISLEAD" PEOPLE IN ORDER TO BRING NON-BELIEVERS TO GOD'S FOLD? Bag-o ni nga doctrine sa Bible rcruman?
The best you could do is pray...go back and read/study your Bible well than BLABBER THE WRONG THINGS rcruman!

You don't know the meaning of MISLEAD.
I've used the word misleading because I'm trying to mislead from your current belief and understanding towards GOD. dili ni bag-o bro just relax and underastand my statement and you will know that the misleading word is appropriate in dealing with atheist or skeptics.

Peace!

[brownprose]

then prove it nga wala ka nagpataka.
I've researched it bro, but the problem is that you're searching to disprove while I'm searching to prove, where on the other end of the rope. So please stop making any personal comments just plain evidence and reference.

WHAT ARE YOU TALKING RCRUMAN Did you really read my reference? The Higg's boson is trying to prove a theory! It is not an effort to search for God as you call it. I'm trying to comment that you don't understand what you're reading or you did not make any prior research to a subject that coherently connects to your "What Scientist looking for is "GOD" and trying to get out of the picture." and thats not a personal comment.

So for us to start let us tackle first HIGGS BOSON, just show your evidence and i will show mine.

So how do you understand my sources/articles that I presented? Don't they tell you the Big Bang connection? Come on rcruman, better admit that you did not read or just simply lack the comprehension skills over a reading material!

you're out of line bro, I didn't Higgs boson to Religion but rather I'm showing things here that Scientist who keep on denying God and searching for things to eliminate God in the picture by proving EVOLUTION and BIG BANG THEORY.

NAMAKAK NAPOD AY. You just said it yourself " But with this article considered as "God particle" it will change some ATHEIST and EVOLUTIONIST." RCRUMAN, stop the crap.

bro the issue here is not the word "GOD PARTICLE" the issue here is that the H particle or HIGGS BOSON, how, what and where is it.

Pastilan nimo rcruman!!! ambot og nakasabot baka anang imong gipanulti oi. "God's Particle" and Higg's Boson are ONE AND THE SAME. Don't you understand your thread rcruman and the issues you pointed out? Use your scroll bar rcruman...it stares you at the face!

And obviously, YOU DIDN'T READ what I posted. Or tell me rcruman, do you have trouble reading and understanding? Don't take this personally, I'm telling you that you have a problem figuring out what you're reading. This is the root to all your confusion and misunderstanding with many posters here.

Did I force you anyone here, where just exchanging evidence and sources here, it was just you and some of your likes who act hestirical and settle to a personal attack.

Naa napod ning imong PATAKA ay... "hestirical" WRONG SPELLING RCRUMAN...that's HYSTERICAL. Do you really understand what hysterical means? And why would I be hysterical, tell me? Don't be ridiculous rcruman. To make corrections on your reasoning and your reckless presentation of facts is not being hysterical rcruman...TABANG NA SIYA NIMO. I'm trying to help you figure out what you say or what you read just that I'm blunt -- nothing personal. Gets?

You don't know the meaning of MISLEAD.
I've used the word misleading because I'm trying to mislead from your current belief and understanding towards GOD. dili ni bag-o bro just relax and underastand my statement and you will know that the misleading word is appropriate in dealing with atheist or skeptics.
Peace!

Holy Rcruman...ASA MAN NA NIMO GIPUNIT IMONG "MISLEAD" nga definition rcruman...pastilan nagimbinto man kag imong dictionary para makalusot ka sa imong pangatarungan. Alang sa imong kasayuran rcruman og basaha intawn og tarong ang definition:

MISLEAD –verb (used with object)
1. to lead or guide wrongly; lead astray.
2. to lead into error of conduct, thought, or judgment.
–verb (used without object)
3. to be misleading; tend to deceive: vague directions that often mislead.

Source: Dictionary.com

Rcruman, para masabtan ka's kadaghanan diri og kung sincero ka sa imong pangatarungan, palihug intawn use the proper words and terminologies. Bluntly, magpatuga tuga kag post yet you use the WRONG TERMS and MISREAD your sources.

Stick to the issue rcruman DON'T BEAT AROUND THE BUSH...STOP LYING & STOP MISLEADING.

Bottomline is YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND THE THREAD YOU JUST CREATED.

[Sinyalan]

HAHAHA... nice brownprose!

[ix_888]

Gyud !

[brownprose]

i wonder where the thread starter is now...hope he gets back with a more sane answer.

[Sinyalan]

I wish this guy (rcruman) reads a lot of books - maybe we can have a sane discussion.

[rcruman]

NAMAKAK NAPOD AY. You just said it yourself " But with this article considered as "God particle" it will change some ATHEIST and EVOLUTIONIST." RCRUMAN, stop the crap.

bro kalma lang, karon beh sa ako bana gikan ang description nga "God's Particle"?
did I label that? I just referred it from an article.

Pastilan nimo rcruman!!! ambot og nakasabot baka anang imong gipanulti oi. "God's Particle" and Higg's Boson are ONE AND THE SAME. Don't you understand your thread rcruman and the issues you pointed out? Use your scroll bar rcruman...it stares you at the face!

And obviously, YOU DIDN'T READ what I posted. Or tell me rcruman, do you have trouble reading and understanding? Don't take this personally, I'm telling you that you have a problem figuring out what you're reading. This is the root to all your confusion and misunderstanding with many posters here.

I don't have troubles in reading and understanding bro, its you who have trouble in settling directly to personal comments.

Naa napod ning imong PATAKA ay... "hestirical" WRONG SPELLING RCRUMAN...that's HYSTERICAL. Do you really understand what hysterical means? And why would I be hysterical, tell me? Don't be ridiculous rcruman. To make corrections on your reasoning and your reckless presentation of facts is not being hysterical rcruman...TABANG NA SIYA NIMO. I'm trying to help you figure out what you say or what you read just that I'm blunt -- nothing personal. Gets?
[b]

anhi ka maayo bro, I think you know that "hestirical" ive typed is the same "Hysterical" you're trying to point. Its just a typo error bro and I admit it. You can't defend your idea by a plain evidence. Look at all your post its towards me anymore not with the issue.

Ok I will let it pass, lets go back to the topic and let us give evidence not personal comments.
Pasensya na gud kung naay wrong spelling kay dili mani spelling contest, and in fact I admitted already that I'm just a first year college student due to financial problems, not need to keep on pointing this mistakes on me.

Holy Rcruman...ASA MAN NA NIMO GIPUNIT IMONG "MISLEAD" nga definition rcruman...pastilan nagimbinto man kag imong dictionary para makalusot ka sa imong pangatarungan. Alang sa imong kasayuran rcruman og basaha intawn og tarong ang definition:

MISLEAD –verb (used with object)
1. to lead or guide wrongly; lead astray.
2. to lead into error of conduct, thought, or judgment.
–verb (used without object)
3. to be misleading; tend to deceive: vague directions that often mislead.

Source: Dictionary.com

ako usbon og klarohon bro ha, when I used mislead it means I'm trying to mislead you from where you're heading to, your knowledge and understanding leading to taking God out of the picture. So I'm misleading you in that way to the knowledge and understanding of supreme BEING.
I will use your source : "1. to lead or guide wrongly; lead astray."
In this definition I'm guiding you wrongly to what you've believed that is right.
Ako dawaton bro nga misleading ako gibuhat sa imoha aron lang makakita kag kahayag nga naay Ginoo.
Kung tan-aw nimo kay misleading ako gibuhat sa imoha aw so be it.

Rcruman, para masabtan ka's kadaghanan diri og kung sincero ka sa imong pangatarungan, palihug intawn use the proper words and terminologies. Bluntly, magpatuga tuga kag post yet you use the WRONG TERMS and MISREAD your sources.
Stick to the issue rcruman DON'T BEAT AROUND THE BUSH...STOP LYING & STOP MISLEADING.
Bottomline is YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND THE THREAD YOU JUST CREATED.

bro wrong spelling rana bro dili ba ka kadawat ana, the thoughts that counts.
nawa ra gud sa dihang nitype kog "HESTERICAL" kay nakasabot ka nga "HYSTERICAL" ako pasabot kay its the thought.

Pero kung ang imo style kay ang pag-atake sa person kaysa principle aw sorry ka na lang dili na musaler sa akoa kay ako na gidawat daan sa ako kaugalingon nga ubos ko og wala ko katapos sa pagtungha kumpara ninyo nga mga professional mo. Mao ni imo nakat-onan bro nga iduso ang pagkatao sa usa ka tao?
Why not tackle the principles rather that personal comments and attacks.

Peace!

[rcruman]

I wish this guy (rcruman) reads a lot of books - maybe we can have a sane discussion.

really? if i didn't laid sane discussion or say it direct to the point that I'm not a sensible or reasonable to discussed with then why not just ignore me?
Or it shows the other way around? the fact that you engaged in discussion with me is that I bring sensible, reasonable or sane discussion here.
You will not waste your time and effort in typing and reading my post if I'm not posting sane discussion.

So kung dili ko ana sa tan-aw ninyo then why not ignore me or dili kaha mo ka-ignore sa akoa kay I'm posting issue here which is directly against with your principles?

OT:
Good advise bro sinyalan that I will read a lot of books.
Then I will give advise also or my wish is that you will read the BIBLE and set aside your complaint to what is happening in this world and to you.

Peace!