unsa nindot nga engineering school? cit o usc?

[urejiak]

---

Ur right but it doesn't mean na kung naay mu top, i.generalize daun nmo na maau ang skul. imma ryt? it depends a lot on the student.

you should answer my question. on that particular post, i never told u nga maayo ang school kay naa hing-top. stay in the subject of the argument. the question is if it matters if a certain school produces a topnotcher. but come to think of it, if maka-produce ug topnotcher ang isa ka school, dili diay pud na reflection nga 'medyo' ok pud ang quality sa education? dili pud ta kaingon nga makatsamba lang ang CIT sa pagproduce ug topnotchers, kay dili man gyud mawagtangan every year. same as USC, d ba?

oh, don't make that an excuse kay kung gusto jud ka mkapasar sa board kay maningkamot jud ka bisan d ka ka afford sa review center.

Whether an excuse or not, that is the reality. a valid one. one of the deciding factor sa passing percentage sa isa ka school. ayt?

ngek nganu man diay kung university? how bout MIT(MAPUA), the best producing engineering school in the phils?.

peace and love y'all.[/QUOTE]
Exactly. That is exactly zyper's point! That USC is a university. And that CIT is not yet as of the moment. Imagine an institution not yet having a university status which is being considered a threat of USC in quiz bowls and board examinations?

[madina]

sa usc diay ko ga skuyla nya walay klaro ang enrollment muna minus ang USC

bwahahaha mao diay bro better pa mobalhin nlang ka before ka ma closan sa enrollment...haha

[Batusi_Kwitis]

Now, to the argument nga poor ang quality of education sa CIT kay daghan ang dili kapasar during board exams BUT daghan mo-top, would you agree that - that would also equate nga dili pud inana kanindot ang training sa USC kay dili man tanan Carolinians mo-top?

Topping the board is more of a personal achievement pal and the rest-->> learning nana sa school... It doesn't necessarily assume for instance that because USC have a lesser Topnotcher in a particular exam you would automaticaly equate it as Dili maayo ug training....

Student selectivity+Comprehensive Curriculum+High Caliber Faculty+Excellent Facilities&Equipments+Industry and Academic Linkages(for research)+ Good Academic Environment=Excellent training

Passing rate speaks volume i believe..
I just wonder why most technologians are Topnotcher fanatic?...and make it as bases of their claim as quality education/producing a quality graduate??....

To the Carolinians, would you accept the fact that CIT is a threat?

For me I would not percieve it as a threat... both schools are respectively doing its best to produce great product I mean graduates to contribute in the development of our beloved SUGBU and in our country in general... Its more of a healthy competition..

ANd owing to the fact nga the rest of the board takers kay walay kwarta para i-review, mang-dive ra na largo take board, unlike sa USC nga naa gyud 'kasagaran' rich people nga bisan unsa kamahal sa review center maka-afford.

Hahaha!! too presumptive kaayu ka da especially the 4-bold-red-letter... lets just say tanan ni take sa CIT walay gyuy kwarta (but thats Highly unlikely to happen haha!!) para review matod pa nimu...but would that be an excuse para dili sila maningkamot ug adto sa library magtuon..,, what about their learnings in 5 straight years of going to school??... Mao naman gud nay resulta kung ang huna2x puros ra tops again nakalimtan na hinuon ang foundation or essence sa ilang gi iskuylahan...

[urejiak]

kanang pag review nimo kay imo nanang paningkamot!

review sa EcE? pabor paman gali ang CIT kay ang dean nila kay dako2x sa excel

naa pa gyud discount as in super daghan discount

pag 2nd sem nila ng review nana sila

kami tawn sa USC busy kaayo mi sa ang Thesis

sa akong review 7k ra ako nabayad included na ang review materials

so kanang 7k gamay rana kaau d kaau na ingnon dako dako gyud

Bro, mahal na kaau na sa mga Technologian ang 7k. Para palit gani newsprint, maglisod pa gani,,,,

[madina]

sakto gyud ka bai... ang nahitabo man gud sa CIT karun kai EXTREMES.... dapat unta dili papasaron ang dili dapat... awa na daghan kaayu mo flunk sa board... and based on my observation mas ila gipriority ang pagpasar/Top sa Board Exam kaysa sa Curriculum mismo which is very wrong.... 2nd year pa gani Laliman kag top the board dayun ang aim sa proff? Heck why not focus on the curriculum itself and let its students to Learn beyond books/review materials by a comprehensive application of theories thru Research Facilities/Industry linkages? ... which is why fragmented kaayu ang learning sa students.. .. and the results---->> HALF BAKED GRADUATES kung baga.. nag kuwang na hinuon sa Foundation tungod anang Board Exam-oriented nila nga style.... Im not saying nga mu apply sa tanan ha ofcourse naa gyuy mo Excel and mo Top especially those who are brilliant and upper tier students.. .. I think this is something that Escario and the rest of his Engineering Dept. cohorts should ponder..



To all Technologians: Opinion lang ni ha NO Hard Feelings., Just a concern cebuano... after all my father and a cousin studied there who are now doing well in their respected fields... my respect to CIT the University hopefully this is a wake-up call.. thankss




Matod pato sa isa ka Forum er diri bahalag hagbong basta naa lai top.. hahaha!!! inyu pud nah.. Paging Madina and cohorts?? where are you now.. I need your replies.. please do let your proffs to join this forum.. I would love to have an Intelligent exchange with them but not necessarily a word war or patas anay ug ihi!! kai concern ko sa CIT... ganahan ko mumata na sila...

maybe bro papasaron sa instructor ang estudyante kay its because naay kalooy ang instructor. CIT man gud kay kadaghanan dili kaayo haruhay ang kinabuhi sa nang-eskwela dri. Mao nang gitagaan nila ug chance nga maka.graduate. Para naku bro kung akoy instructor mas pilion naku makapasar ang estudyante bisag dili kaayo kamao kaysa mawagtangan sya ug chance nga mka graduate kay nahurot na ang kwarta sa parents. Dili baya ing-ana ka sayon mangita ug kwarta karon panahuna. Anyway dili man tanan unlicensed Engineer bati ug trabaho di ba?....sa situation sa USC bro ngpatuyang lang ug hagbong ang mga instructor kay kaybaw sila mga datu kasagaran ang mga estudyante, wla naman gani sila cguro paki ila estudyante bahalag ang uban mamalhin og ang uban mangundang. Mura bag pangwarta gani style sa USC bro. Mas maayo pa diay me kay bisag non-sectarian school pero among instructor kamao malooy where-in SAN CARLOS dako kaayong santos mga instructor di kamao malooy. I think base on my observation asta ang kinaiya og binuhatan sa mga estudyante sa USC layo rajud kaayo compared to USJR.


peace.....paging to kwitis ,scandalous people (u know what i mean) haha and also to arrogant peolple. I already made my reply....ganahan napud ko momata ka.

[urejiak]

Topping the board is more of a personal achievement pal and the rest-->> learning nana sa school... It doesn't necessarily assume for instance that because USC have a lesser Topnotcher in a particular exam you would automaticaly equate it as Dili maayo ug training....

Student selectivity+Comprehensive Curriculum+High Caliber Faculty+Excellent Facilities&Equipments+Industry and Academic Linkages(for research)+ Good Academic Environment=Excellent training

Passing rate speaks volume i believe..
I just wonder why most technologians are Topnotcher fanatic?...and make it as bases of their claim as quality education/producing a quality graduate??....

Nice one you've got, mate. I'm refering to the equation for an excellent training. I admit CIT needs to work on Industry and Academic Linkages.

As to your question why most of the Technologians are Topnotcher fanatic - well then, the answer is CULTURE coupled with tradition. As a freshman student, makakita ka sa Wall of Fame sa CIT - dili na na mawagtang sa imo thinking ang goal to top the board exams. Now, can you blame the Technologians for that?

As for the basis of claims nga toppping the board is an evidence of a quality graduate, why not? Perhaps you are referring to the ability of the school to mass-produce graduates who can pass the board? If its the latter, then well, admittedly, as i already posted before, CIT has to work on reaching out more to the below-average learners. In case you didn't know man gud, CIT has a very effective mentoring programs nga mo-actively participate ang mga above-average student lang. Dili man pud gud nato mapugos ang dili ganahan.

For me I would not percieve it as a threat... both schools are respectively doing its best to produce great product I mean graduates to contribute in the development of our beloved SUGBU and in our country in general... It more of a healthy competition..

By threat, i did not mean any negative aspects of it. Threat, meaning always there to challenge USC. We both know that their is a healthy competition going on between the two, kay if ang isa lang ang mo-dominate every now and then, naay possibility dili na mo-give ug extra effort para makadaug ang isa ka side kay mawad-an na ug challenge.

Hahaha!! too presumptive kaayu ka da especially the 4-bold-red-letter... lets just say tanan ni take sa CIT walay gyuy kwarta (but thats Highly unlikely to happen haha!!) para review matod pa nimu...but would that be an excuse para dili sila maningkamot ug adto sa library magtuon..,, what about their learnings in 5 straight years of going to school??... Mao naman gud nay resulta kung ang huna2x puros ra tops again nakalimtan na hinuon ang foundation or essence sa ilang gi iskuylahan...

Call me presumptive, but that's how i look into the matter. And i know plenty. Wala pud ko muingon na TANAN.I even meant the minority ("the rest"). Magtuon lang sa library? Common. This is the reality mate. A good review sessions before the board can actually help shape your chances to pass. 5 straight years going to school? Make it seven for some Technologians. But better gyud if coupled unta ug good review classes before the board exam. Whatcha think?

Wow, i like playing the devil's advocate here. Hehe. Healthy discussion on USC vs CIT going on!

[Batusi_Kwitis]

maybe bro papasaron sa instructor ang estudyante kay its because naay kalooy ang instructor. CIT man gud kay kadaghanan dili kaayo haruhay ang kinabuhi sa nang-eskwela dri. Mao nang gitagaan nila ug chance nga maka.graduate. Para naku bro kung akoy instructor mas pilion naku makapasar ang estudyante bisag dili kaayo kamao kaysa mawagtangan sya ug chance nga mka graduate kay nahurot na ang kwarta sa parents. Dili baya ing-ana ka sayon mangita ug kwarta karon panahuna. Anyway dili man tanan unlicensed Engineer bati ug trabaho di ba?....sa situation sa USC bro ngpatuyang lang ug hagbong ang mga instructor kay kaybaw sila mga datu kasagaran ang mga estudyante, wla naman gani sila cguro paki ila estudyante bahalag ang uban mamalhin og ang uban mangundang. Mura bag pangwarta gani style sa USC bro. Mas maayo pa diay me kay bisag non-sectarian school pero among instructor kamao malooy where-in SAN CARLOS dako kaayong santos mga instructor di kamao malooy. I think base on my observation asta ang kinaiya og binuhatan sa mga estudyante sa USC layo rajud kaayo compared to USJR.


peace.....paging to kwitis ,scandalous people (u know what i mean) haha and also to arrogant peolple. I already made my reply....ganahan napud ko momata ka.

I understand your sentiments bro but nganung mu Empathize man ka sa estudyante if dili gyud cya angay papasaron?? Education should be fair and objective because it is also the responsibility of the student to learn and meet the school standards and not merely based on tangibility of the professor... DUDE YOU CAN GET A DIPLOMA BUT NOT NECESSARILY AN EDUCATION... LAHI NA ANG DUHA MAO NAY ANGAY NIMU HINUMDUMAN..., haha mediocre ug lame kaayu imung excuse.., sorry gyud kaayu....

But if I were the Dean I will pattern CIT to the likes of MSU-IIT which only accept those deserving students...

[madina]

I understand your sentiments bro but nganung mu Empathize man ka sa estudyante if dili gyud cya angay papasaron?? Education should be fair and objective because it is also the responsibility of the student to learn and meet the school standards and not merely based on tangibility of the professor... DUDE YOU CAN GET A DIPLOMA BUT NOT NECESSARILY AN EDUCATION... LAHI NA ANG DUHA MAO NAY ANGAY NIMU HINUMDUMAN..., haha mediocre ug lame kaayu imung excuse.., sorry gyud kaayu....

But if I were the Dean I will pattern CIT to the likes of MSU-IIT which only accept those deserving students...

haha bro ayaw'g lamia kay dina makaon.....imong style bro kay pang foreign mamili kag estudyante...huna hunaa gud bro ang kahimtang sa Pilipinas dili ing-ana ka datu...ako pa nimo bro gusto man jud diay kag bongga jud na facility nganung gi ang.ang paman nimo na USC ka haha didto unta kas manila's best or sa U.S. best....diba?....wa jud naku gilami bro haha kay maka masa man gud koh haha....diha sa USC bro wla man joy less fortunate nga molongtad kay sa lifestyle plang daan mahal na kaayo. Hilabi na ang kina-iya di maka-on.....haha

[crysyani]

maybe bro papasaron sa instructor ang estudyante kay its because naay kalooy ang instructor. CIT man gud kay kadaghanan dili kaayo haruhay ang kinabuhi sa nang-eskwela dri. Mao nang gitagaan nila ug chance nga maka.graduate. Para naku bro kung akoy instructor mas pilion naku makapasar ang estudyante bisag dili kaayo kamao kaysa mawagtangan sya ug chance nga mka graduate kay nahurot na ang kwarta sa parents. Dili baya ing-ana ka sayon mangita ug kwarta karon panahuna. Anyway dili man tanan unlicensed Engineer bati ug trabaho di ba?....sa situation sa USC bro ngpatuyang lang ug hagbong ang mga instructor kay kaybaw sila mga datu kasagaran ang mga estudyante, wla naman gani sila cguro paki ila estudyante bahalag ang uban mamalhin og ang uban mangundang. Mura bag pangwarta gani style sa USC bro. Mas maayo pa diay me kay bisag non-sectarian school pero among instructor kamao malooy where-in SAN CARLOS dako kaayong santos mga instructor di kamao malooy. I think base on my observation asta ang kinaiya og binuhatan sa mga estudyante sa USC layo rajud kaayo compared to USJR.


peace.....paging to kwitis ,scandalous people (u know what i mean) haha and also to arrogant peolple. I already made my reply....ganahan napud ko momata ka.

lame excuse na papasaron kay maluoy!

maluoy tawn ka sa companya na mo dawat nimo, and malouy tawn ka sa imong kaugalingon!

naka skwela naka ug USJR?

kung ikaw as a student nya naka baw ka na imong parents naningkamot ug maau diha! nya imo lang gi balewala ang chance, hanu magbinuang man ka ug skwela! hahayz! very very lame


naa man scholarship ang USC, naa sad mi mga working

pero wala na ni abot sa amo na kung pobre ka or datu ka!

ambot lang sa MAIN pero sa TC lahi ug culture

- scholar full tuition

[reypel]

haha bro ayaw'g lamia kay dina makaon.....imong style bro kay pang foreign mamili kag estudyante...huna hunaa gud bro ang kahimtang sa Pilipinas dili ing-ana ka datu...ako pa nimo bro gusto man jud diay kag bongga jud na facility nganung gi ang.ang paman nimo na USC ka haha didto unta kas manila's best or sa U.S. best....diba?....wa jud naku gilami bro haha kay maka masa man gud koh haha....diha sa USC bro wla man joy less fortunate nga molongtad kay sa lifestyle plang daan mahal na kaayo. Hilabi na ang kina-iya di maka-on.....haha

less fortunate? i myself is one of the so called less fortunate that you stated above...and im a graduate of USC...why do i have to jive in with the lifestyle if was there to study...its plain and simple im there to study and not to get along with the life style and besides the life style there was ok cowboy ra man mi tnan didto before...and a product of USC has its advantage in employment and happily working on one of the top IT compny in the phils...