Do you agree with the dismissal of "*** inside Car" complaint?

[n`gel]

---

Spring, honestly nabadlongan man pud ko and ako uyab sa una park mi diha one of the streets in Ayala, although nag-away mi ato ngita ug peaceful nga lugar giduol gyud mi ug guard... off limits daw didto. Di na gani na pwede tambayan bisan mag-inom.

And ya i think i see the law side of this story.

[purple]

i don't agree. It is still done in a public area...Mga lalaki ra man siguro ang dili mu agree...Sayop man gyud na sa nag ***. Even in other countries naa man laws regarding *** in the car and to think dili gani mga conservative countries na sila...Rampant man daw ng mag *** sa car even in reclamation area daghan man daw.

[n`gel]

Dogs don't have cars, they mate outside. Coz if they wanted to be like dogs sa gawas nalang unta nila gibuhat di ba? They deserve their privacy pud kay na baya sila sa sulod.

[stellina]

While taking his coffee in Ayala, my foreign hubby told me (I went away for shopping) that there are young "joiners" in ayala who are offering themselves for money, for curiosity he asked his co-national where would they do that, he's been told either in parking area or in cinema. When I read the news, nahinumdom ko sa giingon sa akong husband. Maayo ra sad nga bantayan na ang parking area sa guards aron dili managhan nang mga buhata uy, there are other private places anyway. However I guess reporting to the police for that act is somewhat excessive, this is only my own opinion. Peace.

[talsik]

ARTICLE III
BILL OF RIGHTS
Section 1. No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, nor shall any person be denied the equal protection of the laws.

Section 2. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures of whatever nature and for any purpose shall be inviolable, and no search warrant or warrant of arrest shall issue except upon probable cause to be determined personally by the judge after examination under oath or affirmation of the complainant and the witnesses he may produce, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized.

Correct article but wrong applicatiion...

You know what there was no unreasonable search nga nahitabo here. The guard used his flashlight to know what is inside the moving car. He did not open it with the use of force, intimidation or whatsoever. What he did was a search in plain view. To make it more concrete take this as example, in checkpoints the driver of the car is not oblige to open the door of his car without his CONSENT but is required to lower down his window and open the back compartment but never to open his door to let the searching officer gets in.


Wala jud sala ang guard ana if nakit-an niya while in the performance of his duty nga nag-*** sila. Maybe the lesson here is to be more extra careful and choosy of the place to do such carnal and sacred act... Peace


Section 3. (1) The privacy of communication and correspondence shall be inviolable except upon lawful order of the court, or when public safety or order requires otherwise, as prescribed by law.

http://www.chanrobles.com/article3.htm

law na2...dapat e kiha ang security ana or ayala...f nakit.an nya wala unta nya ge VULGAR..f ne PEEK pa cya d na makitan sa uban tao so dli na indecency...


dapat charge cya 4 damages...lain au na...bsan knsa na tao d ganhn nya ipakta ana ka SACRED na butang...

[purple]

It's about time that the government will enforce the laws on tinted cars. Mao gyud usa ni unta sa deterrent sa criminals.I don't know how the search was done to those who had *** in the car.Regarding the guard there is no law how to handle *** in the car in a mall or what he was just doing his job. It's true what if something is going on inside like rape and murder dili lang diay manghilabot ang guard?

[pnoize]

di man sad pwede makiha ang guard kay he was doing his duties under orders of a superior and was acting in fulfillment of a duty. thus, according to the revised penal code of the philippines, he did not incur any criminal liability.

[raddiboy]

I agree for the dismissal. The news alone is embarassing enough..
Hope this incident will serve as a warning for those who would want to perform *** in that area.

The guard did his job..
Its not really about *** inside the car.. but its more of the car is inside Ayala..
Doesnt mean na nagbayad ta during entrance, we are are free to do what we want..Subject pa gihapon ta sa rules sa ilang area..

[purple]

I agree for the dismissal. The news alone is embarassing enough..
Hope this incident will serve as a warning for those who would want to perform *** in that area.

The guard did his job..
Its not really about *** inside the car.. but its more of the car is inside Ayala..
Doesnt mean na nagbayad ta during entrance, we are are free to do what we want..Subject pa gihapon ta sa rules sa ilang area..

Korek. I agree with you

[FK]

wait for the occupants to come out then INVESTIGATE . Mao na ang PROTOCOL sa SECURITY GUARD or any SECURITY DUTIES.

i agree...

opinion lng nako... ang jurisdiction sa guard is to protect the premises sa parking lot, they could have ask the people inside the car to get-out, since it is not also safe to stay in parking lots. (mahilo sa aso)

besides imagination na tingali to sa guard nga ga uyog2x naa jud milagro sa sulod mao ni lili...