which is better UWA lenses: tokina 11-16, canon 10-22 and 17-40L

[bahiista]

---

@tikboy...
lamats kaau sa explanation bro...

salamat pod sa ubang mga master, sa inyo advices...think i'll go with tokina, murag impressive man kaau iyang result dri as per post of master dj-dark & harvz86...thanks beri many!!! hehehe

research mode....^___^

[xymrydon]

thank sir Sid and sir Harvz for the pics ... palit n jd ko ani ug tokina oi ...

[michaelocana]

nindot master dj-dark oy, todloi ko anang sa gabie beh hehehehehe

ang price sa tokina 12-24 nga DXII kay P29T 3mos ago ko nipalit sa hidalgo to

post sad ko bahalag bati





.

[xymrydon]

nindot master dj-dark oy, todloi ko anang sa gabie beh hehehehehe

ang price sa tokina 12-24 nga DXII kay P29T 3mos ago ko nipalit sa hidalgo to

post sad ko bahalag bati





.

asa ba nkabati ani sir oi, unsa nlang jd diay ang nindot ...

[phatwell83]

mga bro, opposite sa canon ang rotation sa zooming sa tokina? like the nikon lenses? murag mo balhin kog vote sa tokina... hehehehehehe

if yes? di ba mag lisod ug adjust ang canon user? hehehehe

[michaelocana]

wa koy idea sa canon ani boss phatwell kay Naykon ko
pero im sure di ka maglisod kay dali ra kaayo na ninyo.. hehehe tokina nata

mga bro, opposite sa canon ang rotation sa zooming sa tokina? like the nikon lenses? murag mo balhin kog vote sa tokina... hehehehehehe

if yes? di ba mag lisod ug adjust ang canon user? hehehehe

[markyap]

for full frame sympre 17-40L4 or 16-35L2.8 is the way to go.
if you are sticking with crop body 10-22 is very good optically though not built like those L lenses.

however i would also greatly consider the new Sigma EX 10-20mm f/3.5 EX DC HSM. hypersonic motor for quite faster more accurate focusing, fix 3.5 aperture throughout the length of its range. EX is sigmas pro line of lenses similar to canons L series therefore built very good with expensive/better materials yet its price is cheaper than the consumer grade 10-22.

[markyap]

Canon 10-22, if it wouldn't be an EF-S lens it would be rate as a L.

no it would not...
its built with cheaper material...less rugged...no sealing...far from an L type lens. it needs to be a lot more to get that designation.

this is a clear misunderstanding/misinterpretation on what other people posted online when this lens first came out.
what people ment to point out was the image quality of this consumer grade canon 10-22 efs is so good its comparable that of uwa L lenses.

besides there is no rule that states canon can't build an EFS L lens in the future? EFS only signifies the lens mount thats only 100% compatible with cropped canon bodies so far though not all cropped canon bodies (none efs designation like the canon 10D and D60) support it.

canon already gave an L designation to the lens on the PRO1 prosumer camera. that's not even a DSLR lens.

[Jacobus]

tokina 11-16 f/2.8

[lemreyes]

My main gripe with the new version of Sigma 10-20 is it's 82mm filter size. It's very hard to find these sizes and they are very expensive.